Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?

Christian Carlow-OFBizzer
Does it make sense to add "Inspection" as a Routing Task Type?
Currently, "Manufacturing", "Assembly", and "Sub-contracting" are the
three values available which doesn't account for inspection-only tasks.  
The purpose type could just be left blank but I'm not entirely sure of
the use of the field and if its worth adding the Inspection task.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?

Pierre Smits
Christian,

You could do a search on anly of the types (the
associated workEffortPurposeTypeId) to see whether these are referenced in
services and to evaluate what these services do.

Regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Christian Carlow <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> Does it make sense to add "Inspection" as a Routing Task Type? Currently,
> "Manufacturing", "Assembly", and "Sub-contracting" are the three values
> available which doesn't account for inspection-only tasks.  The purpose
> type could just be left blank but I'm not entirely sure of the use of the
> field and if its worth adding the Inspection task.
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?

Christian Carlow-OFBizzer
Neither "ROU_ASSEMBLING", "ROU_MANUFACTURING", nor "ROU_SUBCONTRACTING"
were found to be used in any business logic.  I couldn't find any
documentation about them in the DMRB either.  I'll just tell the users
to leave that field blank if the task doesn't involve actual
manufacturing or assembling.

On 02/03/2014 09:15 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:

> Christian,
>
> You could do a search on anly of the types (the
> associated workEffortPurposeTypeId) to see whether these are referenced in
> services and to evaluate what these services do.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Christian Carlow <[hidden email]
>> wrote:
>> Does it make sense to add "Inspection" as a Routing Task Type? Currently,
>> "Manufacturing", "Assembly", and "Sub-contracting" are the three values
>> available which doesn't account for inspection-only tasks.  The purpose
>> type could just be left blank but I'm not entirely sure of the use of the
>> field and if its worth adding the Inspection task.
>>