Any quick and comprehensive reference for the widget xmls?

[jonwimp]

Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all about them?

Jonathon

[jonwimp]

David,

I had wanted to let this slide, seeing how there's no response for past 5 days. Would've been a
simple answer like "go here for references".

Not that I need this anymore, but for the newcomers at large, I thought I'd ask this again.

Perhaps I REALLY missed a spot on the internet and didn't see the references you wrote and
published. If so, please do let me know.

I'm ok with Andrew Sykes' comment about a foible: we ask a question, only to figure out the answer
ourselves just when the community responds to question.

But at least let me be the LAST victim of such unfortunate circumstance? Let the next newbie like
me not have to ask this same question?

Jonathon

Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all about them?
>
> Jonathon
>
>

[David E Jones]

On Jan 22, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote:

> David,
>
> I had wanted to let this slide, seeing how there's no response for  
> past 5 days. Would've been a simple answer like "go here for  
> references".
>
> Not that I need this anymore, but for the newcomers at large, I  
> thought I'd ask this again.
>
> Perhaps I REALLY missed a spot on the internet and didn't see the  
> references you wrote and published. If so, please do let me know.
>
> I'm ok with Andrew Sykes' comment about a foible: we ask a  
> question, only to figure out the answer ourselves just when the  
> community responds to question.
>
> But at least let me be the LAST victim of such unfortunate  
> circumstance? Let the next newbie like me not have to ask this same  
> question?

I'm confused... how would answering this on this mailing list solve  
the problem more permanently than my previous answers on this mailing  
list?

-David


> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>> Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all  
>> about them?
>> Jonathon
>

[jonwimp]

David (Jones),

I just came across
http://www.undersunconsulting.com/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=OFBDOCREF .

I didn't realize those references are there. Do you have an electronic version of those references
we can help ourselves to?

If not, would I get in trouble for reverse-engineering the Widget XML engine and publishing an
"engineer's manual" of sorts?

Jonathon

Jonathon -- Improov wrote:

> David,
>
> I had wanted to let this slide, seeing how there's no response for past
> 5 days. Would've been a simple answer like "go here for references".
>
> Not that I need this anymore, but for the newcomers at large, I thought
> I'd ask this again.
>
> Perhaps I REALLY missed a spot on the internet and didn't see the
> references you wrote and published. If so, please do let me know.
>
> I'm ok with Andrew Sykes' comment about a foible: we ask a question,
> only to figure out the answer ourselves just when the community responds
> to question.
>
> But at least let me be the LAST victim of such unfortunate circumstance?
> Let the next newbie like me not have to ask this same question?
>
> Jonathon
>
> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>> Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all about
>> them?
>>
>> Jonathon
>>
>>
>
>

[David E Jones]

On Jan 26, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote:

> David (Jones),
>
> I just came across http://www.undersunconsulting.com/ecommerce/ 
> control/category/~category_id=OFBDOCREF .
>
> I didn't realize those references are there. Do you have an  
> electronic version of those references we can help ourselves to?

No.

> If not, would I get in trouble for reverse-engineering the Widget  
> XML engine and publishing an "engineer's manual" of sorts?

No.

If you were expected more detailed answers please let me know which  
and I'd be happy to elaborate.

-David

> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>> David,
>> I had wanted to let this slide, seeing how there's no response for  
>> past 5 days. Would've been a simple answer like "go here for  
>> references".
>> Not that I need this anymore, but for the newcomers at large, I  
>> thought I'd ask this again.
>> Perhaps I REALLY missed a spot on the internet and didn't see the  
>> references you wrote and published. If so, please do let me know.
>> I'm ok with Andrew Sykes' comment about a foible: we ask a  
>> question, only to figure out the answer ourselves just when the  
>> community responds to question.
>> But at least let me be the LAST victim of such unfortunate  
>> circumstance? Let the next newbie like me not have to ask this  
>> same question?
>> Jonathon
>> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>>> Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all  
>>> about them?
>>>
>>> Jonathon
>>>
>>>
>

[jonwimp]

David,

No, not expecting a more detailed answer. Umbrella answers like "you can go ahead to publish any
engineer's manual" is fine by me. :)

But seriously, if you have any objections, please do let me know before I dash my face bloody
against unseen barriers (legal or otherwise).

Jonathon

David E. Jones wrote:

>
> On Jan 26, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>
>> David (Jones),
>>
>> I just came across
>> http://www.undersunconsulting.com/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=OFBDOCREF 
>> .
>>
>> I didn't realize those references are there. Do you have an electronic
>> version of those references we can help ourselves to?
>
> No.
>
>> If not, would I get in trouble for reverse-engineering the Widget XML
>> engine and publishing an "engineer's manual" of sorts?
>
> No.
>
> If you were expected more detailed answers please let me know which and
> I'd be happy to elaborate.
>
> -David
>
>
>> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>>> David,
>>> I had wanted to let this slide, seeing how there's no response for
>>> past 5 days. Would've been a simple answer like "go here for
>>> references".
>>> Not that I need this anymore, but for the newcomers at large, I
>>> thought I'd ask this again.
>>> Perhaps I REALLY missed a spot on the internet and didn't see the
>>> references you wrote and published. If so, please do let me know.
>>> I'm ok with Andrew Sykes' comment about a foible: we ask a question,
>>> only to figure out the answer ourselves just when the community
>>> responds to question.
>>> But at least let me be the LAST victim of such unfortunate
>>> circumstance? Let the next newbie like me not have to ask this same
>>> question?
>>> Jonathon
>>> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>>>> Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all
>>>> about them?
>>>>
>>>> Jonathon
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

[cjhowe]

http://www.opensourcestrategies.com/ofbiz/tutorials.php

read the section of "Cookbooks"


--- Jonathon -- Improov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> David,
>
> No, not expecting a more detailed answer. Umbrella answers like "you
> can go ahead to publish any
> engineer's manual" is fine by me. :)
>
> But seriously, if you have any objections, please do let me know
> before I dash my face bloody
> against unseen barriers (legal or otherwise).
>
> Jonathon
>
> David E. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 26, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> >
> >> David (Jones),
> >>
> >> I just came across
> >>
>

http://www.undersunconsulting.com/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=OFBDOCREF

>
> >> .
> >>
> >> I didn't realize those references are there. Do you have an
> electronic
> >> version of those references we can help ourselves to?
> >
> > No.
> >
> >> If not, would I get in trouble for reverse-engineering the Widget
> XML
> >> engine and publishing an "engineer's manual" of sorts?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > If you were expected more detailed answers please let me know which
> and
> > I'd be happy to elaborate.
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> >> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> >>> David,
> >>> I had wanted to let this slide, seeing how there's no response
> for
> >>> past 5 days. Would've been a simple answer like "go here for
> >>> references".
> >>> Not that I need this anymore, but for the newcomers at large, I
> >>> thought I'd ask this again.
> >>> Perhaps I REALLY missed a spot on the internet and didn't see the
>
> >>> references you wrote and published. If so, please do let me know.
> >>> I'm ok with Andrew Sykes' comment about a foible: we ask a
> question,
> >>> only to figure out the answer ourselves just when the community
> >>> responds to question.
> >>> But at least let me be the LAST victim of such unfortunate
> >>> circumstance? Let the next newbie like me not have to ask this
> same
> >>> question?
> >>> Jonathon
> >>> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> >>>> Or do I have to go through the widget Java sources to learn all
> >>>> about them?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jonathon
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>