BI main page text into several labels

[Jacques Le Roux]

Jacopo,

I wonder why you cut the BI main page text into several labels. I understand that there are several sentences, but as it's easier to deal with sentences than words in different languages, it's also easier to deal with paragraphs or complete texts than with sentences (easier to cut as you prefer, using idoms, etc.). I already translated these labels in French but should we not have only a sole labels for all the text (or one for each paragraph) ?

Thanks

Jacques

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

Hi Jacques,

I didn't implement the i18n of the bi component, and I agree with you  
that we should try to unify as much as possible the labels (and assign  
more meaningful keys).

Jacopo

On Mar 7, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Jacopo,
>
> I wonder why you cut the BI main page text into several labels. I  
> understand that there are several sentences, but as it's easier to  
> deal with sentences than words in different languages, it's also  
> easier to deal with paragraphs or complete texts than with sentences  
> (easier to cut as you prefer, using idoms, etc.). I already  
> translated these labels in French but should we not have only a sole  
> labels for all the text (or one for each paragraph) ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques

[Jacques Le Roux]

Thanks Jacopo,

I will try to tackle that. BTW what is the BI component status ?

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

> Hi Jacques,
>
> I didn't implement the i18n of the bi component, and I agree with you  
> that we should try to unify as much as possible the labels (and assign  
> more meaningful keys).
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Mar 7, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Jacopo,
>>
>> I wonder why you cut the BI main page text into several labels. I  
>> understand that there are several sentences, but as it's easier to  
>> deal with sentences than words in different languages, it's also  
>> easier to deal with paragraphs or complete texts than with sentences  
>> (easier to cut as you prefer, using idoms, etc.). I already  
>> translated these labels in French but should we not have only a sole  
>> labels for all the text (or one for each paragraph) ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>
>

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

Hi JAcques,

and sorry for the late reply.

The BI component has already very basic low level tools that are  
needed to implement star schemas and ETL logic; now we have to  
implement the reports (and in the process refine the tools); however  
the reports will be in the relevant components (not in bi).

You may also have a look at the presentation I did at Apachecon:

http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/124

Jacopo

On Mar 7, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Thanks Jacopo,
>
> I will try to tackle that. BTW what is the BI component status ?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>> Hi Jacques,
>> I didn't implement the i18n of the bi component, and I agree with  
>> you  that we should try to unify as much as possible the labels  
>> (and assign  more meaningful keys).
>> Jacopo
>> On Mar 7, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Jacopo,
>>>
>>> I wonder why you cut the BI main page text into several labels. I  
>>> understand that there are several sentences, but as it's easier  
>>> to  deal with sentences than words in different languages, it's  
>>> also  easier to deal with paragraphs or complete texts than with  
>>> sentences  (easier to cut as you prefer, using idoms, etc.). I  
>>> already  translated these labels in French but should we not have  
>>> only a sole  labels for all the text (or one for each paragraph) ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Jacopo,

I should work soon on Spago BI for a company, hence my question

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

> Hi JAcques,
>
> and sorry for the late reply.
>
> The BI component has already very basic low level tools that are  
> needed to implement star schemas and ETL logic; now we have to  
> implement the reports (and in the process refine the tools); however  
> the reports will be in the relevant components (not in bi).
>
> You may also have a look at the presentation I did at Apachecon:
>
> http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/124
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Mar 7, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jacopo,
>>
>> I will try to tackle that. BTW what is the BI component status ?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>>> Hi Jacques,
>>> I didn't implement the i18n of the bi component, and I agree with  
>>> you  that we should try to unify as much as possible the labels  
>>> (and assign  more meaningful keys).
>>> Jacopo
>>> On Mar 7, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> Jacopo,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder why you cut the BI main page text into several labels. I  
>>>> understand that there are several sentences, but as it's easier  
>>>> to  deal with sentences than words in different languages, it's  
>>>> also  easier to deal with paragraphs or complete texts than with  
>>>> sentences  (easier to cut as you prefer, using idoms, etc.). I  
>>>> already  translated these labels in French but should we not have  
>>>> only a sole  labels for all the text (or one for each paragraph) ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>
>>
>
>