Build Error

[Jacques Le Roux]

Help yourself
http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yAk#MailingLists-DesignanddevelopmentList

Jacques

From: "Raghu(VASSoft.net)" <[hidden email]>

> unsubscribe
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> I think Jacques is right about the current source code, there are a
>> few minor issues that make it 1.6 only.  I made some changes and got
>> it to compile, I'll give it a test run and see how it goes.
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> On 14/11/2009, at 12:00 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm... yes you are right, Jacques, sorry for that.
>>> I will try to find out more information...
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Jacopo,
>>>>
>>>> These are really old ones or do I miss something ?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Scott,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5
>>>>>>> for me,  why are you trying to compile dbcp?
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>> On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'd suggest that you revert it for now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP
>>>>>>>>> needs  the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT :
>>>>>>>>> <<This release  of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3
>>>>>>>>> (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5  (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). >>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a
>>>>>>>>> way  out, not obvious...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So the alternative is
>>>>>>>>> 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug)
>>>>>>>>> 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this  
>>>>>>>>> upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the
>>>>>>>>> right  time
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue
>>>>>>>>> to  search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem
>>>>>>>>> easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd
>>>>>>>>> not like  to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Adrian,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use
>>>>>>>>>> the  1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem
>>>>>>>>>> appeared...
>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ?
>>>>>>>>>> BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any
>>>>>>>>>> blocking  reasons I don't remember ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>> Latest trunk:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build
>>>>>>>>>>> \classes
>>>>>>>>>>> [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity
>>>>>>>>>>> \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory
>>>>>>>>>>> [javac15] bad class file:
>>>>>>>>>>> C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-20091111-
>>>>>>>>>>> r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class)
>>>>>>>>>>> [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0
>>>>>>>>>>> [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the
>>>>>>>>>>> correct  subdirectory of the classpath.
>>>>>>>>>>> [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory;
>>>>>>>>>>> [javac15]                                ^
>>>>>>>>>>> [javac15] 1 error
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>