Component and Component Set Dependencies

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Deepak,

Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies and remove in the graph
the dependency from the accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>

could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to applications/datamodel?

I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph for maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step is
almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data duplicated
<https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)

Thanks

Jacques

[Deepak Dixit-3]

Hi Jacques,

I'll check and share details ASAP.

On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Deepak,
>
> Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies and
> remove in the graph the dependency from the accounting to workeffort
> introduced by r1710178 ;
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
>
> could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from
> accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to applications/datamodel?
>
> I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph for
> maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step is
> almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data duplicated
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>"
> thread)
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Great, thanks Deepak

Jacques


Le 20/08/2018 à 06:20, Deepak Dixit a écrit :

> Hi Jacques,
>
> I'll check and share details ASAP.
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Deepak,
>
>     Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>     <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies> and remove in the graph the dependency from the
>     accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
>     <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
>
>     could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to applications/datamodel?
>
>     I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph for maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step is
>     almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data duplicated
>     <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Jacques
>
>

[Deepak Dixit-4]

Hi Jacques,

I think we are good and can delete the comments.

Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit


On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Great, thanks Deepak
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 20/08/2018 à 06:20, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> I'll check and share details ASAP.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Deepak,
>>
>>     Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>> uence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>>     <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component
>> +and+Component+Set+Dependencies> and remove in the graph the dependency
>> from the
>>     accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
>>     <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
>>
>>     could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from
>> accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to applications/datamodel?
>>
>>     I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph for
>> maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step is
>>     almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data
>> duplicated
>>     <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c
>> 904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)
>>
>>     Thanks
>>
>>     Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>

[Pierre Smits-3]

It would be better to let the comments stay until all undesirable
dependencies are removed and ticket OFBIZ-3500 has been closed.


Best regards,

Pierre Smits

Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President
Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member
Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
*Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer

On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Jacques,
>
> I think we are good and can delete the comments.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Great, thanks Deepak
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
> > Le 20/08/2018 à 06:20, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
> >
> >> Hi Jacques,
> >>
> >> I'll check and share details ASAP.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> >> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Hi Deepak,
> >>
> >>     Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> >> uence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
> >>     <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component
> >> +and+Component+Set+Dependencies> and remove in the graph the dependency
> >> from the
> >>     accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
> >>     <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
> >>
> >>     could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from
> >> accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to
> applications/datamodel?
> >>
> >>     I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph
> for
> >> maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step
> is
> >>     almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data
> >> duplicated
> >>     <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c
> >> 904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)
> >>
> >>     Thanks
> >>
> >>     Jacques
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Pierre,

Could you please clarify why we still need to keep these comment now that the dependencies are in the graph.

Notably the comment you made

    This diagram is missing:

      * a dependency of Accounting on Manufacturing,

would be interesting if there was an explanation of the exact dependency from Accounting on Manufacturing. If it's not data dependencies, which are
now resolved for applications.

For order on accounting code dependency, I believe it's impossible to remove. Those need to be interconnected (eg when you send an order you need to
create an invoice).

Thanks

Jacques


Le 08/09/2018 à 11:20, Pierre Smits a écrit :

> It would be better to let the comments stay until all undesirable
> dependencies are removed and ticket OFBIZ-3500 has been closed.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President
> Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member
> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> I think we are good and can delete the comments.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> --
>> Deepak Dixit
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Great, thanks Deepak
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 20/08/2018 à 06:20, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>>
>>>> I'll check and share details ASAP.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      Hi Deepak,
>>>>
>>>>      Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>>>> uence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>>>>      <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component
>>>> +and+Component+Set+Dependencies> and remove in the graph the dependency
>>>> from the
>>>>      accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
>>>>      <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
>>>>
>>>>      could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from
>>>> accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to
>> applications/datamodel?
>>>>      I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph
>> for
>>>> maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step
>> is
>>>>      almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data
>>>> duplicated
>>>>      <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c
>>>> 904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)
>>>>
>>>>      Thanks
>>>>
>>>>      Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Pierre,

Without explanation about the exact dependency from Accounting to Manufacturing I'll remove the comments.

It would really help to have even just an idea of the kind of this/se dependeny/ies if it's/they are still existing. Then, if they still exist, a
OFBIZ-3500 subtask could be created/

All this because I'd like to clarify the graph and remove component dependencies when they were just due to data being in each component and now in

    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/datamodel/data

TIA for your help

Jacques


Le 21/09/2018 à 16:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Could you please clarify why we still need to keep these comment now that the dependencies are in the graph.
>
> Notably the comment you made
>
>     This diagram is missing:
>
>       * a dependency of Accounting on Manufacturing,
>
> would be interesting if there was an explanation of the exact dependency from Accounting on Manufacturing. If it's not data dependencies, which are
> now resolved for applications.
>
> For order on accounting code dependency, I believe it's impossible to remove. Those need to be interconnected (eg when you send an order you need to
> create an invoice).
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 08/09/2018 à 11:20, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>> It would be better to let the comments stay until all undesirable
>> dependencies are removed and ticket OFBIZ-3500 has been closed.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Pierre Smits
>>
>> Apache Trafodion<https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President
>> Apache Directory<https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member
>> Apache Incubator<https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
>> *Apache OFBiz<https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
>> since 2008*
>> Apache Steve<https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Deepak Dixit<[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>
>>> I think we are good and can delete the comments.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> --
>>> Deepak Dixit
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great, thanks Deepak
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 20/08/2018 à 06:20, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll check and share details ASAP.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>>>> [hidden email]  <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>      Hi Deepak,
>>>>>
>>>>>      Before I remove all the comments athttps://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>>>>> uence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>>>>>      <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component +and+Component+Set+Dependencies>  and remove in the graph the dependency
>>>>> from the
>>>>>      accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
>>>>>      <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
>>>>>
>>>>>      could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from
>>>>> accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to
>>> applications/datamodel?
>>>>>      I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph
>>> for
>>>>> maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step
>>> is
>>>>>      almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data
>>>>> duplicated
>>>>>      <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c 904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)
>>>>>
>>>>>      Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>      Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>

[Pierre Smits-3]

Hi Jacques, all,

Doing a search in your favourite IDE on 'manufacturing' reveals all
references. A cursory review in mine showed a lot of inclusions of the
ManufacturingUiLabels.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
*Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
*Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer


On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:31 AM Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Pierre,
>
> Without explanation about the exact dependency from Accounting to
> Manufacturing I'll remove the comments.
>
> It would really help to have even just an idea of the kind of this/se
> dependeny/ies if it's/they are still existing. Then, if they still exist, a
> OFBIZ-3500 subtask could be created/
>
> All this because I'd like to clarify the graph and remove component
> dependencies when they were just due to data being in each component and
> now in
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/datamodel/data
>
> TIA for your help
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 21/09/2018 à 16:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Could you please clarify why we still need to keep these comment now that
> the dependencies are in the graph.
>
> Notably the comment you made
>
> This diagram is missing:
>
>    - a dependency of Accounting on Manufacturing,
>
> would be interesting if there was an explanation of the exact dependency
> from Accounting on Manufacturing. If it's not data dependencies, which are
> now resolved for applications.
>
> For order on accounting code dependency, I believe it's impossible to
> remove. Those need to be interconnected (eg when you send an order you need
> to create an invoice).
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 08/09/2018 à 11:20, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>
> It would be better to let the comments stay until all undesirable
> dependencies are removed and ticket OFBIZ-3500 has been closed.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org> <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President
> Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org> <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member
> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org> <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org> <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org> <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jacques,
>
> I think we are good and can delete the comments.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> Great, thanks Deepak
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 20/08/2018 à 06:20, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
>
>
> Hi Jacques,
>
> I'll check and share details ASAP.
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> <[hidden email]>>
> wrote:
>
>     Hi Deepak,
>
>     Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> uence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>     <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component
> +and+Component+Set+Dependencies> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies> and remove in the graph the dependency
> from the
>     accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
>     <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
>
>     could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from
> accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to
>
> applications/datamodel?
>
>     I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph
>
> for
>
> maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step
>
> is
>
>     almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data
> duplicated
>     <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c
> 904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Jacques
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Thanks Pierre,

I'll have a closer look. If it's only labels that can be "easily" fixed.

Jacques


Le 04/10/2018 à 14:05, Pierre Smits a écrit :

> Hi Jacques, all,
>
> Doing a search in your favourite IDE on 'manufacturing' reveals all
> references. A cursory review in mine showed a lot of inclusions of the
> ManufacturingUiLabels.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:31 AM Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> Without explanation about the exact dependency from Accounting to
>> Manufacturing I'll remove the comments.
>>
>> It would really help to have even just an idea of the kind of this/se
>> dependeny/ies if it's/they are still existing. Then, if they still exist, a
>> OFBIZ-3500 subtask could be created/
>>
>> All this because I'd like to clarify the graph and remove component
>> dependencies when they were just due to data being in each component and
>> now in
>>
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/datamodel/data
>>
>> TIA for your help
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 21/09/2018 à 16:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> Could you please clarify why we still need to keep these comment now that
>> the dependencies are in the graph.
>>
>> Notably the comment you made
>>
>> This diagram is missing:
>>
>>     - a dependency of Accounting on Manufacturing,
>>
>> would be interesting if there was an explanation of the exact dependency
>> from Accounting on Manufacturing. If it's not data dependencies, which are
>> now resolved for applications.
>>
>> For order on accounting code dependency, I believe it's impossible to
>> remove. Those need to be interconnected (eg when you send an order you need
>> to create an invoice).
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 08/09/2018 à 11:20, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>>
>> It would be better to let the comments stay until all undesirable
>> dependencies are removed and ticket OFBIZ-3500 has been closed.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Pierre Smits
>>
>> Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org> <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President
>> Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org> <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member
>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org> <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org> <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
>> since 2008*
>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org> <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> I think we are good and can delete the comments.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> --
>> Deepak Dixit
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Great, thanks Deepak
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 20/08/2018 à 06:20, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> I'll check and share details ASAP.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> <[hidden email]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>      Hi Deepak,
>>
>>      Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>> uence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>>      <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component
>> +and+Component+Set+Dependencies> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies> and remove in the graph the dependency
>> from the
>>      accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
>>      <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
>>
>>      could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from
>> accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to
>>
>> applications/datamodel?
>>
>>      I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph
>>
>> for
>>
>> maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step
>>
>> is
>>
>>      almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data
>> duplicated
>>      <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c
>> 904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)
>>
>>      Thanks
>>
>>      Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Pierre, All,

If we consider inter components labels dependencies, I fear several (most?) applications components are inter dependent.

For instance looking for "uiLabelMap.Manufacturing"(which does not guarantee to find all Manufacturing labels since it's a convention and not all
labels are such prefixed) in all files you find these applications use at least one:

  * accounting
  * order
  * product

If you look for ManufacturingUiLabels (more relevant) in all file, the same applications use at least one.

In  comment there, Pierre you reported a dependency from accounting to manufacturing and we added it.

But we have no dependencies shown for order, nor product, to manufacturing on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies

Now I have a question: should we consider labels dependencies in this graph and complete it? I don't think so, the graph which is already loaded with
links would become illegible (maybe the underline Digraph code would still be useful though).

Remains that we have a lot of inter components labels dependencies. There are 2 possible views on this:

 1. Anyway we don't want to separate the applications and they will forever stand together. So we just remove the links between application in the
    graph above with the comments (tempting hè :))
 2. We still want to separate the applications (one day...) and they we need to take in consideration of kind of dependencies.

I believe we still want to separate the applications, notably those who are more peripherals, like HR, marketing. Those could be extracted as plugins.
Pierre even mentioned manufacturing, where I don't agree, but that could be discussed.

A simple solution for labels is to extract those which are inter-components and put them in the applications using them or common if several use them

What do you think?

Jacques

Le 04/10/2018 à 14:15, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Thanks Pierre,
>
> I'll have a closer look. If it's only labels that can be "easily" fixed.
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 04/10/2018 à 14:05, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>> Hi Jacques, all,
>>
>> Doing a search in your favourite IDE on 'manufacturing' reveals all
>> references. A cursory review in mine showed a lot of inclusions of the
>> ManufacturingUiLabels.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Pierre Smits
>>
>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
>> since 2008*
>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:31 AM Jacques Le Roux <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pierre,
>>>
>>> Without explanation about the exact dependency from Accounting to
>>> Manufacturing I'll remove the comments.
>>>
>>> It would really help to have even just an idea of the kind of this/se
>>> dependeny/ies if it's/they are still existing. Then, if they still exist, a
>>> OFBIZ-3500 subtask could be created/
>>>
>>> All this because I'd like to clarify the graph and remove component
>>> dependencies when they were just due to data being in each component and
>>> now in
>>>
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/datamodel/data
>>>
>>> TIA for your help
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 21/09/2018 à 16:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi Pierre,
>>>
>>> Could you please clarify why we still need to keep these comment now that
>>> the dependencies are in the graph.
>>>
>>> Notably the comment you made
>>>
>>> This diagram is missing:
>>>
>>>     - a dependency of Accounting on Manufacturing,
>>>
>>> would be interesting if there was an explanation of the exact dependency
>>> from Accounting on Manufacturing. If it's not data dependencies, which are
>>> now resolved for applications.
>>>
>>> For order on accounting code dependency, I believe it's impossible to
>>> remove. Those need to be interconnected (eg when you send an order you need
>>> to create an invoice).
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 08/09/2018 à 11:20, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>>>
>>> It would be better to let the comments stay until all undesirable
>>> dependencies are removed and ticket OFBIZ-3500 has been closed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Pierre Smits
>>>
>>> Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org> <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President
>>> Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org> <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member
>>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org> <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
>>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org> <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
>>> since 2008*
>>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org> <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Deepak Dixit <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>
>>> I think we are good and can delete the comments.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> --
>>> Deepak Dixit
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Great, thanks Deepak
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 20/08/2018 à 06:20, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>
>>> I'll check and share details ASAP.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> <[hidden email]>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>      Hi Deepak,
>>>
>>>      Before I remove all the comments at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>>> uence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>>>      <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component
>>> +and+Component+Set+Dependencies> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies> and remove in the
>>> graph the dependency
>>> from the
>>>      accounting to workeffort introduced by r1710178 ;
>>> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1710178>
>>>
>>>      could you please confirm there is no longer data dependencies from
>>> accounting to workeffort since we moved the data to
>>>
>>> applications/datamodel?
>>>
>>>      I guess there should not be and we should try to clean this graph
>>>
>>> for
>>>
>>> maybe other such dependencies (only because of data) now that this step
>>>
>>> is
>>>
>>>      almost complete (after Rishi's future effort on "Shipping data
>>> duplicated
>>>      <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c
>>> 904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>
>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f5118a1cd378aed4e5af7c904fc026f36ba5c7aa78862f72d813348b@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E>" thread)
>>>
>>>      Thanks
>>>
>>>      Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>