Controller response type suggestion

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Controller response type suggestion

ian tabangay
Hi. Im having problems processing errors and success pages after calling a
service. Is there any documentation regarding when to use a specific type of
response? I have the following questions in particular:
 - What is the difference between *request* and *view*
 - Setting the response type as either *request* or *view*, when I refresh
my browser, the form previously submitted was still processed. If, however,
I set the response type to *request-redirect-noparam *will not process the
next form since no information was passed. I try not to use *
request-redirect* to avoid displaying sensitive data on the URL. What other
alternatives do i have?
Thank you in advance.


Ian
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Controller response type suggestion

BJ Freeman
suggest you go thru the
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Documentation+Index

ian tabangay sent the following on 6/26/2008 9:27 PM:

> Hi. Im having problems processing errors and success pages after calling a
> service. Is there any documentation regarding when to use a specific type of
> response? I have the following questions in particular:
>  - What is the difference between *request* and *view*
>  - Setting the response type as either *request* or *view*, when I refresh
> my browser, the form previously submitted was still processed. If, however,
> I set the response type to *request-redirect-noparam *will not process the
> next form since no information was passed. I try not to use *
> request-redirect* to avoid displaying sensitive data on the URL. What other
> alternatives do i have?
> Thank you in advance.
>
>
> Ian
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Controller response type suggestion

ian tabangay
I have but its not updated. The
http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs/control.html#RequestHandler doesn't even
describe what a response of type *request* is. The training videos barely
touches on the difference of each types. In the end, my 2 questions are
still unanswered. But thanks for your effort to help.


Ian

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote:

> suggest you go thru the
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Documentation+Index
>
> ian tabangay sent the following on 6/26/2008 9:27 PM:
> > Hi. Im having problems processing errors and success pages after calling
> a
> > service. Is there any documentation regarding when to use a specific type
> of
> > response? I have the following questions in particular:
> >  - What is the difference between *request* and *view*
> >  - Setting the response type as either *request* or *view*, when I
> refresh
> > my browser, the form previously submitted was still processed. If,
> however,
> > I set the response type to *request-redirect-noparam *will not process
> the
> > next form since no information was passed. I try not to use *
> > request-redirect* to avoid displaying sensitive data on the URL. What
> other
> > alternatives do i have?
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> >
> > Ian
> >
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Controller response type suggestion

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
Yes notably http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/PQM but of course all documents are very usefull. I mean at least read them before hoping to do
anything serious in OFBiz...

Jacques

From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>

> suggest you go thru the
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Documentation+Index
>
> ian tabangay sent the following on 6/26/2008 9:27 PM:
>> Hi. Im having problems processing errors and success pages after calling a
>> service. Is there any documentation regarding when to use a specific type of
>> response? I have the following questions in particular:
>>  - What is the difference between *request* and *view*
>>  - Setting the response type as either *request* or *view*, when I refresh
>> my browser, the form previously submitted was still processed. If, however,
>> I set the response type to *request-redirect-noparam *will not process the
>> next form since no information was passed. I try not to use *
>> request-redirect* to avoid displaying sensitive data on the URL. What other
>> alternatives do i have?
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>>
>> Ian
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Controller response type suggestion

ian tabangay
Thanks. But Im already in the stage of refining my screen flows and possibly
preventing problems arriving from refreshing from a post request and
unpopulated forms because of an error in processing a service. Unfortunately
I noticed that this is also the same problem found in most screens on the
demo of ofbiz so its not much of a help as well.


Ian

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes notably http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/PQM but of course all documents are
> very usefull. I mean at least read them before hoping to do anything serious
> in OFBiz...
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]>
>
>  suggest you go thru the
>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Documentation+Index
>>
>> ian tabangay sent the following on 6/26/2008 9:27 PM:
>>
>>> Hi. Im having problems processing errors and success pages after calling
>>> a
>>> service. Is there any documentation regarding when to use a specific type
>>> of
>>> response? I have the following questions in particular:
>>>  - What is the difference between *request* and *view*
>>>  - Setting the response type as either *request* or *view*, when I
>>> refresh
>>> my browser, the form previously submitted was still processed. If,
>>> however,
>>> I set the response type to *request-redirect-noparam *will not process
>>> the
>>> next form since no information was passed. I try not to use *
>>> request-redirect* to avoid displaying sensitive data on the URL. What
>>> other
>>> alternatives do i have?
>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Controller response type suggestion

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by ian tabangay
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Framework+Introduction+Videos+and+Diagrams
the # 7: UI Artifacts: Request, View, Screen, Form (20:43) is specific
if you look at the code it is pretty clear.

ian tabangay sent the following on 6/27/2008 1:23 AM:

> I have but its not updated. The
> http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs/control.html#RequestHandler doesn't even
> describe what a response of type *request* is. The training videos barely
> touches on the difference of each types. In the end, my 2 questions are
> still unanswered. But thanks for your effort to help.
>
>
> Ian
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> suggest you go thru the
>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Documentation+Index
>>
>> ian tabangay sent the following on 6/26/2008 9:27 PM:
>>> Hi. Im having problems processing errors and success pages after calling
>> a
>>> service. Is there any documentation regarding when to use a specific type
>> of
>>> response? I have the following questions in particular:
>>>  - What is the difference between *request* and *view*
>>>  - Setting the response type as either *request* or *view*, when I
>> refresh
>>> my browser, the form previously submitted was still processed. If,
>> however,
>>> I set the response type to *request-redirect-noparam *will not process
>> the
>>> next form since no information was passed. I try not to use *
>>> request-redirect* to avoid displaying sensitive data on the URL. What
>> other
>>> alternatives do i have?
>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Controller response type suggestion

ian tabangay
Im sorry. I just rewatched the video you just mentioned but I didnt hear him
discuss about difference of each request type which was what I wanted to
learn.


Ian

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:43 PM, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Framework+Introduction+Videos+and+Diagrams
> the # 7: UI Artifacts: Request, View, Screen, Form (20:43) is specific
> if you look at the code it is pretty clear.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Controller response type suggestion

BJ Freeman
if your looking for what can be done it is best to have a XML editor and
look at framework/webapp/dtd/site-conf.xsd
this has the controller defined.
then by doing a search in code for each you can see how they are used.

ian tabangay sent the following on 6/27/2008 2:15 AM:

> Im sorry. I just rewatched the video you just mentioned but I didnt hear him
> discuss about difference of each request type which was what I wanted to
> learn.
>
>
> Ian
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:43 PM, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Framework+Introduction+Videos+and+Diagrams
>> the # 7: UI Artifacts: Request, View, Screen, Form (20:43) is specific
>> if you look at the code it is pretty clear.
>