|
|
I have swapped out DBCPConnectionFactory for MinervaConnectionFactory and
all seems to be working. However, I have not been able to get the
DBCPConnectionFactory to fail here at home, so I expect only a long term
test will tell the tail.
What I am wondering is why the decision was made to switch
DBCPConnectionFactory instead of the existing MinervaConnectionFactory. I
ask this question because I am wondering if the benefits of using
DBCPConnectionFactory would justify the considerable effort that would be
required to chase this down.
I spent all day reading about these two connection pool implementations and
can't see why one would use one over the other. I am hoping that someone
can point me to some reading or give me a short synopsis.
Skip
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1432 - Release Date: 5/14/2008
7:49 AM
|
Locked
