[DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
Locked
[DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
 
Administrator
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
Administrator
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
Administrator
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
Hi Jacques,
inline... Am 11.12.18 um 13:42 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > Because > > 1. The if condition has a cost (3 times more than nothing according to > Mathieu's reference[1]) Yes, right, but it's certainly less costly than the direct execution of Debug.logXxxx... And that's the point. You don't want to run these statments thousands of times within a minute (in production systems), which is the case in central functionality like the controller. You can only leave out the if conditions if you are sure that the correpsonding debug level is always on. As I said earlier, this is not the case for verbose, debug and info on production systems. > 2. and is not consistently used. Who cares? Each improvement is a gain and if we only introduce these conditions in the hotspot functionality, it's an improvement. It's not only black and white... > 3. Using "Beautiful Logger" could be a better solution: > https://github.com/forax/beautiful_logger > drawbacks: > * needs Java 11 to build. But will we use Java 8 forever? Can > run with Java 8. > * "put more pressure to the JITs so it may lengthen the time to > steady state of an application." > > [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5UkoLaW6ME (French) Although this seems interesting, it is fairly new with the first release early this year. I won't recommend to introduce it until it's field tested (in production). Thanks, Michael > > Jacques > > Le 11/12/2018 à 12:15, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : >> We already agreed and decided to keep the if condition. I'm not sure >> why this subject is being reopened. >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:49 PM Jacques Le Roux >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> The question is quite simple. It's about always using or not the /if >>> (Debug.levelOn()) {/ expression for the info and debug level as >>> suggests Michael. >>> >>> Or only using /if/ /(Debug.verboseOn()) { /expression as I recommend >>> for the reasons explained. >>> >>> I think we all agree the /if/ /(Debug.verboseOn()) { /should always >>> be used and enforced when missing. >>> >>> I put all the details/arguments to easily refer to them if needed. >>> >>> Also Mathieu suggested to Michael to have a look at "Beautiful >>> Logger" because he is concerned by the logging performance. We could >>> also have a look >>> at it, to see if it could be integrated OOTB. >>> >>> HTH >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> Le 10/12/2018 à 18:02, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : >>>> I didn't understand the exact decision required? To do what vs what? >>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:43 PM Jacques Le Roux >>>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> After OFBIZ-10052, OFBIZ-10448, and OFBIZ-10697 I think it's time >>>>> to have another discussion following >>>>> https://markmail.org/message/mplvusuqn7oshl4v >>>>> which was one year ago. >>>>> >>>>> In OFBIZ-10697 I wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <<OK let me explain my point. >>>>> >>>>> By default OOTB debug.properties sets all debug levels to be >>>>> used but verbose. So there is no point checking other levels than >>>>> verbose to see if >>>>> they are used, they are anyway. So OOTB only checking >>>>> verbose is needed. That's what developers need. >>>>> >>>>> Now you invoked production where a different >>>>> debug.properties setting would be used. Sincerely I'd never, >>>>> never, remove the other levels than >>>>> verbose from a production setting (as it's OOTB). I'd even >>>>> be quite reluctant to remove any of those levels from a production >>>>> site running for >>>>> years! *You never know what can happen*, and those debug >>>>> levels are your only lifebelt in case of issues, small and big ones. >>>>> >>>>> That's my point, and that's why I see checking if a level is >>>>> used as premature optimisation but for verbose. We need them >>>>> anyway and IMO setting >>>>> false for any but verbose in debug.properties in production >>>>> would be conceited if not "suicidal" . But maybe you have use >>>>> cases I ignore? >>>>> >>>>> Anway, I'll start a discussion in dev ML about this point. >>>>> Like I said above and in OFBIZ-10448 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10448>: >>>>> >>>>> I'd be all for removing the 312 useless cases but not >>>>> the "if (Debug.verboseOn())">> >>>>> >>>>> To what Michael answered >>>>> >>>>> <<We have several projects with huge traffic and you >>>>> certainly won't run them on debug level info, verbose or debug. >>>>> In my view, at least these 3 debug levels should be checked. >>>>> At least, existing checks should not be removed.>> >>>>> >>>>> I think Michael's point is perfectly valid. So I answered: >>>>> >>>>> <<I had not the same experience, you are lucky to not cross >>>>> any issue in production needing an info or debug level. >>>>> OK then we need to see things otherwise and rather enforce >>>>> the checks to these 2 levels at least in all the source (Java and >>>>> Groovy). That's what >>>>> I'll ask in the convo to come in dev ML.>> >>>>> >>>>> So what are your opinion about that? Should we enforce as suggest >>>>> Michael or should we remove for the reasons I wrote. >>>>> >>>>> I'd prefer to be consistent. So either we enforce the checks to >>>>> the info, verbose and debug levels. Either we only keep the >>>>> verbose checks. >>>>> >>>>> Finally Mathieu has added a grain of salt: >>>>> >>>>> <<Hello Michael Brohl >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=mbrohl>, >>>>> >>>>> If you care about the impact of loggers on performance you >>>>> should take a look at the Beautiful Logger >>>>> <https://github.com/forax/beautiful_logger> >>>>> library by Remi Forax which implements a truly transparent >>>>> logger. In a recent Devoxx talk >>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5UkoLaW6ME> (in >>>>> french) he showed that even doing if (Debug.logXXX()) has a >>>>> 3x slowdown compared to a no-op.>> >>>>> >>>>> So maybe we should have a closer look at Beautiful Logger before >>>>> taking any decision? Note that it uses JitPack, hence seems to >>>>> need "Java 11 to build". >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> > |
smime.p7s (5K)
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
Administrator
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files
|
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |