[DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

Sharan Foga
Hi All

I'd like to start the discussion about whether we are ready to move the documentation framework code into the trunk. Do people think that more testing is needed or that some updates/fixes need to be put in place first?

Thanks
Sharan
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

taher
I think the code will change very rapidly in the beginning until we settle
and iron out all the kinks in the design. So I would recommend committing
the code and then evolve as we go.

So +1

On Mar 2, 2018 9:30 PM, "Sharan Foga" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi All
>
> I'd like to start the discussion about whether we are ready to move the
> documentation framework code into the trunk. Do people think that more
> testing is needed or that some updates/fixes need to be put in place first?
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

Michael Brohl-3
In reply to this post by Sharan Foga
+1 for putting it into trunk and moving forward from there.

Thanks,
Michael


> Am 02.03.2018 um 19:29 schrieb Sharan Foga <[hidden email]>:
>
> Hi All
>
> I'd like to start the discussion about whether we are ready to move the documentation framework code into the trunk. Do people think that more testing is needed or that some updates/fixes need to be put in place first?
>
> Thanks
> Sharan

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

Gil Portenseigne
+1 for working directly in trunk!
Regards

Le 2 mars 2018 21:48:55 GMT+01:00, Michael Brohl <[hidden email]> a écrit :

>+1 for putting it into trunk and moving forward from there.
>
>Thanks,
>Michael
>
>
>> Am 02.03.2018 um 19:29 schrieb Sharan Foga <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I'd like to start the discussion about whether we are ready to move
>the documentation framework code into the trunk. Do people think that
>more testing is needed or that some updates/fixes need to be put in
>place first?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sharan

--
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

Sharan Foga
+1

Actually I'm in favour of putting what we have in the trunk too and update it as we go.

Thanks
Sharan

On 2018/03/03 07:07:27, Gil Portenseigne <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 for working directly in trunk!
> Regards
>
> Le 2 mars 2018 21:48:55 GMT+01:00, Michael Brohl <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> >+1 for putting it into trunk and moving forward from there.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Michael
> >
> >
> >> Am 02.03.2018 um 19:29 schrieb Sharan Foga <[hidden email]>:
> >>
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> I'd like to start the discussion about whether we are ready to move
> >the documentation framework code into the trunk. Do people think that
> >more testing is needed or that some updates/fixes need to be put in
> >place first?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sharan
>
> --
> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

Olivier.heintz
+1

Thanks

Le 03/03/2018 à 10:00, Sharan Foga a écrit :

> +1
>
> Actually I'm in favour of putting what we have in the trunk too and update it as we go.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> On 2018/03/03 07:07:27, Gil Portenseigne <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> +1 for working directly in trunk!
>> Regards
>>
>> Le 2 mars 2018 21:48:55 GMT+01:00, Michael Brohl <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>> +1 for putting it into trunk and moving forward from there.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 02.03.2018 um 19:29 schrieb Sharan Foga <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about whether we are ready to move
>>> the documentation framework code into the trunk. Do people think that
>>> more testing is needed or that some updates/fixes need to be put in
>>> place first?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Sharan
>>
>> --
>> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

taher
Thank you all for your feedback and support.

The PoC is committed to trunk in r1826199. Looking forward to the next steps

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Olivier Heintz
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks
>
> Le 03/03/2018 à 10:00, Sharan Foga a écrit :
>> +1
>>
>> Actually I'm in favour of putting what we have in the trunk too and update it as we go.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sharan
>>
>> On 2018/03/03 07:07:27, Gil Portenseigne <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> +1 for working directly in trunk!
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Le 2 mars 2018 21:48:55 GMT+01:00, Michael Brohl <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>> +1 for putting it into trunk and moving forward from there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Am 02.03.2018 um 19:29 schrieb Sharan Foga <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about whether we are ready to move
>>>> the documentation framework code into the trunk. Do people think that
>>>> more testing is needed or that some updates/fixes need to be put in
>>>> place first?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Sharan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving the Documentation PoC into the Trunk

Sharan-F
\o/ :-D

Excellent! And huge thanks Taher

Thanks
Sharan


On 8.3.2018 11:23, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:

> Thank you all for your feedback and support.
>
> The PoC is committed to trunk in r1826199. Looking forward to the next steps
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Olivier Heintz
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Le 03/03/2018 à 10:00, Sharan Foga a écrit :
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Actually I'm in favour of putting what we have in the trunk too and update it as we go.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sharan
>>>
>>> On 2018/03/03 07:07:27, Gil Portenseigne <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> +1 for working directly in trunk!
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Le 2 mars 2018 21:48:55 GMT+01:00, Michael Brohl <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>>> +1 for putting it into trunk and moving forward from there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 02.03.2018 um 19:29 schrieb Sharan Foga <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about whether we are ready to move
>>>>> the documentation framework code into the trunk. Do people think that
>>>>> more testing is needed or that some updates/fixes need to be put in
>>>>> place first?
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Sharan
>>>> --
>>>> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.