Default ordering of webapps titles in main menu

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Default ordering of webapps titles in main menu

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi,

In dev ML, we discussed the change of "default ordering of webapps titles" in main menu: https://markmail.org/message/ftgfpwztflty7klb

I started the implementation with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12166. It's already used in trunk demo.

I now want to discuss that more openly in user ML because obviously we are all concerned.

One thing can't be achieved using the position webapp attribute: the position of webtools. Because it is secondary. I changed that too.

If you don't agree with these changes please let us know, why, and what you propose else. Beware: bikeshedding will not be accepted :)

Thanks

Jacques

Le 21/10/2020 à 07:11, Pritam Kute a écrit :

> Hello Jacques,
>
> The order of menus which you are suggesting looks good to me as well.
>
> Kind Regards,
> --
> Pritam Kute
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:52 PM James Yong <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> The order of the application list looks fine to me. Understand we can
>> still override the ordering if there is client requirement.
>>
>> Regard,
>> James
>>
>> On 2020/10/15 10:33:40 Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I propose this order (did my best but quickly, could have missed
>> things), applications 1st:
>>>   1. partymgr(because you need parties to do anything)
>>>   2. catalog (because you need products to do anything)
>>>   3. facility (because you need to store products to do anything)
>>>   4. order (because it's there that things begin to "move")
>>>   5. accounting  (because it's there that things "end"; ar & ap should
>> disappear)
>>>   6. content (because you need to associate contents to make things
>> better)
>>>   7. manufacturing (because OFBiz is also an ERP)
>>>   8. sfa (because people are often looking for a CRM, BTW most them don't
>> know what SFA is)
>>>   9. workeffort (this one could be above, but it's not obvious for most
>> people)
>>> 10. humanres (more important than below IMO)
>>> 11. marketing (not sure about the place of this one)
>>> 12. webtools (maybe higher?)
>>>
>>> ------------- (plugins start below)
>>>
>>>   1. rest (could be named api soon)
>>>   2. projectmgr
>>>   3. webpos
>>>   4. bi
>>>   5. birt
>>>   6. myportal
>>>   7. assetmaint
>>>   8. ismgr
>>>   9. scrum
>>> 10. solr
>>> 11. ebay
>>> 12. firstdata
>>> 13. ------------- (those are special, maybe above?)
>>> 14. example
>>> 15. exampleext
>>>
>>> ------------- (those plugins don't show atm but exist, maybe need more
>> info from backend menu?)
>>>   1. ecommerce
>>>   2. ecomseo
>>>   3. multiflex
>>>   4. cmssite
>>>   5. ebaystore
>>>   6. ldap
>>>   7. lucene
>>>   8. passport
>>>   9. pricat
>>> 10. msggateway
>>>
>>> Please let me know your thoughts, TIA
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 11/10/2020 à 10:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>>> Hi James,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to define an order for webapps in function of their OOTB
>> importance. If we agree we should discuss the OOTB order of importance of
>>>> applications webapps and then plugins.
>>>>
>>>> I think we can quickly agree, and hope it would not open a Pandora box
>> :)
>>>> Also the feature should be easily changed by custom projects. Maybe
>> documentation for that would be enough.
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> Le 11/10/2020 à 06:37, James Yong a écrit :
>>>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>>>
>>>>> What kind of ordering are you looking for the webapp menu items?
>>>>> Customer specific ordering?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> James
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2020/10/08 10:34:08, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Today Deepak answered on user ML
>> https://markmail.org/message/syzvyyueheejyyce how to order webapps titles
>> in main menu.
>>>>>> BTW OOTB it would work for <webapp name="order" only if you do the
>> same in birt where there is a 2nd <webapp name="order" ;)
>>>>>> I think we already discussed that in the past but I don't clearly
>> remember the result and I'd like to be sure about that.
>>>>>> Should we not order webapps by default?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For instance I don't like much to have firstdatapaymentgateway
>> visible at the top in the main bar for the default theme.
>>>>>> And globally having more important apps in 1st places would be
>> better.
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>>