Administrator
|
Hi,
In dev ML, we discussed the change of "default ordering of webapps titles" in main menu: https://markmail.org/message/ftgfpwztflty7klb I started the implementation with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12166. It's already used in trunk demo. I now want to discuss that more openly in user ML because obviously we are all concerned. One thing can't be achieved using the position webapp attribute: the position of webtools. Because it is secondary. I changed that too. If you don't agree with these changes please let us know, why, and what you propose else. Beware: bikeshedding will not be accepted :) Thanks Jacques Le 21/10/2020 à 07:11, Pritam Kute a écrit : > Hello Jacques, > > The order of menus which you are suggesting looks good to me as well. > > Kind Regards, > -- > Pritam Kute > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:52 PM James Yong <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Jacques, >> >> The order of the application list looks fine to me. Understand we can >> still override the ordering if there is client requirement. >> >> Regard, >> James >> >> On 2020/10/15 10:33:40 Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I propose this order (did my best but quickly, could have missed >> things), applications 1st: >>> 1. partymgr(because you need parties to do anything) >>> 2. catalog (because you need products to do anything) >>> 3. facility (because you need to store products to do anything) >>> 4. order (because it's there that things begin to "move") >>> 5. accounting (because it's there that things "end"; ar & ap should >> disappear) >>> 6. content (because you need to associate contents to make things >> better) >>> 7. manufacturing (because OFBiz is also an ERP) >>> 8. sfa (because people are often looking for a CRM, BTW most them don't >> know what SFA is) >>> 9. workeffort (this one could be above, but it's not obvious for most >> people) >>> 10. humanres (more important than below IMO) >>> 11. marketing (not sure about the place of this one) >>> 12. webtools (maybe higher?) >>> >>> ------------- (plugins start below) >>> >>> 1. rest (could be named api soon) >>> 2. projectmgr >>> 3. webpos >>> 4. bi >>> 5. birt >>> 6. myportal >>> 7. assetmaint >>> 8. ismgr >>> 9. scrum >>> 10. solr >>> 11. ebay >>> 12. firstdata >>> 13. ------------- (those are special, maybe above?) >>> 14. example >>> 15. exampleext >>> >>> ------------- (those plugins don't show atm but exist, maybe need more >> info from backend menu?) >>> 1. ecommerce >>> 2. ecomseo >>> 3. multiflex >>> 4. cmssite >>> 5. ebaystore >>> 6. ldap >>> 7. lucene >>> 8. passport >>> 9. pricat >>> 10. msggateway >>> >>> Please let me know your thoughts, TIA >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> Le 11/10/2020 à 10:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>>> Hi James, >>>> >>>> I'd like to define an order for webapps in function of their OOTB >> importance. If we agree we should discuss the OOTB order of importance of >>>> applications webapps and then plugins. >>>> >>>> I think we can quickly agree, and hope it would not open a Pandora box >> :) >>>> Also the feature should be easily changed by custom projects. Maybe >> documentation for that would be enough. >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> Le 11/10/2020 à 06:37, James Yong a écrit : >>>>> Hi Jacques, >>>>> >>>>> What kind of ordering are you looking for the webapp menu items? >>>>> Customer specific ordering? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> James >>>>> >>>>> On 2020/10/08 10:34:08, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Today Deepak answered on user ML >> https://markmail.org/message/syzvyyueheejyyce how to order webapps titles >> in main menu. >>>>>> BTW OOTB it would work for <webapp name="order" only if you do the >> same in birt where there is a 2nd <webapp name="order" ;) >>>>>> I think we already discussed that in the past but I don't clearly >> remember the result and I'd like to be sure about that. >>>>>> Should we not order webapps by default? >>>>>> >>>>>> For instance I don't like much to have firstdatapaymentgateway >> visible at the top in the main bar for the default theme. >>>>>> And globally having more important apps in 1st places would be >> better. >>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |