Dev - this week's development blog is done!

[David E. Jones]

There is no reason I can see to be concerned about this. We will have our own little corner of the Apache SVN world and there will be no interference from other projects.

-David


BJ Freeman wrote:

> the only question I have is if you split off all this won't it get lost
> in the ASF since is is one big SVN?
>
> maybe it is my old age, and not wanting to got thru major changes.. LOL.
>
>
> David E. Jones sent the following on 5/28/2006 1:52 PM:
>> I commented in another message about the opentravelsystem component stuff. This is the course that we discussed quite a while back, and I'd rather stick to it than expand the scope of the OFBiz to ASF move before we're even done...
>>
>> Anyway, on the directory organization...
>>
>> It sounds like you're proposing that the website directory be moved out from under the main OFBiz directory. Is that correct? Is there a particular reason for this?
>>
>> I've thought about splitting out the applications directory in a similar way, and perhaps even creating a "framework" directory that would contain everything except the applications directory, but in a way it's a pain to have that be a peer to the framework directory, and if we did it with that we should do it with the "hot-deploy" and "specialized" directories too...
>>
>> Anyone have any thoughts on this?
>>
>> BTW, _if_ we do any directory reorganization it will happen in the current SVN repository and be before the ASF move. I want the initial ASF SVN check-in to be the same (as much as possible...) to a specific SVN revision in the current repository...
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> Hans,
>>>
>>> I think that you have introduced an interesting point about the
>>> opentravelsystem component: should we move some of the specialized
>>> components to the ASF together with the core OFBiz?
>>>
>>> For me it's ok to move the OTS component to the ASF, by the way I'd
>>> prefer a structure like this:
>>>
>>> trunk/ofbiz
>>> trunk/website
>>> trunk/specialized/opentravelsystem
>>>
>>> What others think about this?
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> Hans Bakker wrote:
>>>> On Saturday 27 May 2006 12:52, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>> I agree that it's very important that someone (David Jones) has admin
>>>>> privileges on the ASF SVN server so that he can manage permissions and
>>>>> the migration of the source code from our current server to the new one.
>>>>> As soon as David has these rights (Yoav, David W., do you have any hints
>>>>> about this subject?) everything will be easier.
>>>>> About the structure, what about the following one:
>>>>>
>>>>> trunk/ofbiz
>>>>> trunk/website
>>>>>
>>>> I would appreciate if a third could be added, currently called the
>>>> opentravelsystem, but now evolved into a shared ofbiz system addon where more
>>>> customers/sites can share the same physical installation. The first sites
>>>> will go in production the next few months.
>>>>
>>>> Is this possible?
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations with the fact that LGPL packages are now removed!
>>>>
>>>  
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

[David E. Jones]

Okay, as of this evening we should have all jars with questionable licensing removed from the main ofbiz tree. For details please see:

http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/Vg

With this I think we are ready to move the code based to the Apache SVN server. However, I would appreciate some independent reviews to make sure I didn't miss anything...

I think for now we've decided to go with generic committer privileges, so we can pretty much go with this in the very near future.

-David


Christian Geisert wrote:

> Jacopo Cappellato schrieb:
>> As pointed out by crisg in
>> http://ofbizwiki.go-integral.com/Wiki.jsp?page=LibrariesIncludedInOFBiz
>
> Thats me, I started reviewing it but ran out of time...
>
> I think it would be a good thing to have this list checked before the
> svn move and I hope to find some time to help.
>
> mail.jar seems to be another problem seems but this could be replaced
> with a version from Geronimo or Glassfish
>
> Christian
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

[Jacopo Cappellato]

+1000

David E. Jones wrote:

> Okay, as of this evening we should have all jars with questionable licensing removed from the main ofbiz tree. For details please see:
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/Vg
>
> With this I think we are ready to move the code based to the Apache SVN server. However, I would appreciate some independent reviews to make sure I didn't miss anything...
>
> I think for now we've decided to go with generic committer privileges, so we can pretty much go with this in the very near future.
>
> -David
>
>
> Christian Geisert wrote:
>> Jacopo Cappellato schrieb:
>>> As pointed out by crisg in
>>> http://ofbizwiki.go-integral.com/Wiki.jsp?page=LibrariesIncludedInOFBiz
>> Thats me, I started reviewing it but ran out of time...
>>
>> I think it would be a good thing to have this list checked before the
>> svn move and I hope to find some time to help.
>>
>> mail.jar seems to be another problem seems but this could be replaced
>> with a version from Geronimo or Glassfish
>>
>> Christian
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>

 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev