OFBiz › OFBiz - Dev

Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

‹ Previous Topic Next Topic ›
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
 8 messages Options
Adrian Crum-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

Adrian Crum-2
The current demo data sets up a single company with a handful of internal organizations that could be considered departments (DemoOrganizationData.xml). I would like to expand this demo data to make it more enterprise-like.

The organization would look like:

Company
  Divison A
    Accounting Department
      Employees
      Suppliers
      Etc
    Sales Department
      Employees
      Suppliers
      Etc
  Division B
    Branch 1
      Accounting Department
        Employees
        Suppliers
        Etc
      Sales Department
        Employees
        Suppliers
        Etc
    Branch 2
      Accounting Department
        Employees
        Suppliers
        Etc
      Sales Department
        Employees
        Suppliers
        Etc

What do you think?

-Adrian



     

Ashish Vijaywargiya
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

Ashish Vijaywargiya
Hello Adrian,

The hierarchy looks good to me. One quick question:

-- Are you thinking to maintain the relevant data in a SINGLE file?

--
Ashish

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> wrote:

> The current demo data sets up a single company with a handful of internal
> organizations that could be considered departments
> (DemoOrganizationData.xml). I would like to expand this demo data to make it
> more enterprise-like.
>
> The organization would look like:
>
> Company
>  Divison A
>    Accounting Department
>      Employees
>      Suppliers
>      Etc
>    Sales Department
>      Employees
>      Suppliers
>      Etc
>  Division B
>    Branch 1
>      Accounting Department
>        Employees
>        Suppliers
>        Etc
>      Sales Department
>        Employees
>        Suppliers
>        Etc
>    Branch 2
>      Accounting Department
>        Employees
>        Suppliers
>        Etc
>      Sales Department
>        Employees
>        Suppliers
>        Etc
>
> What do you think?
>
> -Adrian
>
>
>
>
>
>
Adrian Crum-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

Adrian Crum-2
The organization data would be in DemoOrganizationData.xml.

-Adrian

--- On Sun, 8/23/09, Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 9:57 PM
> Hello Adrian,
>
> The hierarchy looks good to me. One quick question:
>
> -- Are you thinking to maintain the relevant data in a
> SINGLE file?
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > The current demo data sets up a single company with a
> handful of internal
> > organizations that could be considered departments
> > (DemoOrganizationData.xml). I would like to expand
> this demo data to make it
> > more enterprise-like.
> >
> > The organization would look like:
> >
> > Company
> >  Divison A
> >    Accounting Department
> >      Employees
> >      Suppliers
> >      Etc
> >    Sales Department
> >      Employees
> >      Suppliers
> >      Etc
> >  Division B
> >    Branch 1
> >      Accounting Department
> >        Employees
> >        Suppliers
> >        Etc
> >      Sales Department
> >        Employees
> >        Suppliers
> >        Etc
> >    Branch 2
> >      Accounting Department
> >        Employees
> >        Suppliers
> >        Etc
> >      Sales Department
> >        Employees
> >        Suppliers
> >        Etc
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > -Adrian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>




Jacques Le Roux-2-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

Jacques Le Roux-2-2
+1

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>

> The organization data would be in DemoOrganizationData.xml.
>
> -Adrian
>
> --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> From: Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 9:57 PM
>> Hello Adrian,
>>
>> The hierarchy looks good to me. One quick question:
>>
>> -- Are you thinking to maintain the relevant data in a
>> SINGLE file?
>>
>> --
>> Ashish
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The current demo data sets up a single company with a
>> handful of internal
>> > organizations that could be considered departments
>> > (DemoOrganizationData.xml). I would like to expand
>> this demo data to make it
>> > more enterprise-like.
>> >
>> > The organization would look like:
>> >
>> > Company
>> > Divison A
>> > Accounting Department
>> > Employees
>> > Suppliers
>> > Etc
>> > Sales Department
>> > Employees
>> > Suppliers
>> > Etc
>> > Division B
>> > Branch 1
>> > Accounting Department
>> > Employees
>> > Suppliers
>> > Etc
>> > Sales Department
>> > Employees
>> > Suppliers
>> > Etc
>> > Branch 2
>> > Accounting Department
>> > Employees
>> > Suppliers
>> > Etc
>> > Sales Department
>> > Employees
>> > Suppliers
>> > Etc
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > -Adrian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>      
>
>
Anil Patel-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

Anil Patel-3
This data enhancement will help a lot with testing Accounting module  
reports and gl postings where each division has their own books.

Adrian, thanks for your help with this.

Regards
Anil Patel

On Aug 24, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> +1
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>> The organization data would be in DemoOrganizationData.xml.
>> -Adrian
>> --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]
>> > wrote:
>>> From: Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]>
>>> Subject: Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data
>>> To: [hidden email]
>>> Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 9:57 PM
>>> Hello Adrian,
>>> The hierarchy looks good to me. One quick question:
>>> -- Are you thinking to maintain the relevant data in a
>>> SINGLE file?
>>> --
>>> Ashish
>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > The current demo data sets up a single company with a
>>> handful of internal
>>> > organizations that could be considered departments
>>> > (DemoOrganizationData.xml). I would like to expand
>>> this demo data to make it
>>> > more enterprise-like.
>>> >
>>> > The organization would look like:
>>> >
>>> > Company
>>> > Divison A
>>> > Accounting Department
>>> > Employees
>>> > Suppliers
>>> > Etc
>>> > Sales Department
>>> > Employees
>>> > Suppliers
>>> > Etc
>>> > Division B
>>> > Branch 1
>>> > Accounting Department
>>> > Employees
>>> > Suppliers
>>> > Etc
>>> > Sales Department
>>> > Employees
>>> > Suppliers
>>> > Etc
>>> > Branch 2
>>> > Accounting Department
>>> > Employees
>>> > Suppliers
>>> > Etc
>>> > Sales Department
>>> > Employees
>>> > Suppliers
>>> > Etc
>>> >
>>> > What do you think?
>>> >
>>> > -Adrian
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>

Adrian Crum
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

Adrian Crum
For now I will just create the party hierarchy. I don't know that I will
have time to set up separate accounting.

-Adrian

Anil Patel wrote:

> This data enhancement will help a lot with testing Accounting module
> reports and gl postings where each division has their own books.
>
> Adrian, thanks for your help with this.
>
> Regards
> Anil Patel
>
> On Aug 24, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>>> The organization data would be in DemoOrganizationData.xml.
>>> -Adrian
>>> --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Ashish Vijaywargiya
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> From: Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]>
>>>> Subject: Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data
>>>> To: [hidden email]
>>>> Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 9:57 PM
>>>> Hello Adrian,
>>>> The hierarchy looks good to me. One quick question:
>>>> -- Are you thinking to maintain the relevant data in a
>>>> SINGLE file?
>>>> --
>>>> Ashish
>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > The current demo data sets up a single company with a
>>>> handful of internal
>>>> > organizations that could be considered departments
>>>> > (DemoOrganizationData.xml). I would like to expand
>>>> this demo data to make it
>>>> > more enterprise-like.
>>>> >
>>>> > The organization would look like:
>>>> >
>>>> > Company
>>>> > Divison A
>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>> > Employees
>>>> > Suppliers
>>>> > Etc
>>>> > Sales Department
>>>> > Employees
>>>> > Suppliers
>>>> > Etc
>>>> > Division B
>>>> > Branch 1
>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>> > Employees
>>>> > Suppliers
>>>> > Etc
>>>> > Sales Department
>>>> > Employees
>>>> > Suppliers
>>>> > Etc
>>>> > Branch 2
>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>> > Employees
>>>> > Suppliers
>>>> > Etc
>>>> > Sales Department
>>>> > Employees
>>>> > Suppliers
>>>> > Etc
>>>> >
>>>> > What do you think?
>>>> >
>>>> > -Adrian
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>
>
>
Anil Patel-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

Anil Patel-3
Adrian,
I'll try to get other needed stuff in there.

Regards
Anil Patel

On Aug 24, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> For now I will just create the party hierarchy. I don't know that I  
> will have time to set up separate accounting.
>
> -Adrian
>
> Anil Patel wrote:
>> This data enhancement will help a lot with testing Accounting  
>> module reports and gl postings where each division has their own  
>> books.
>> Adrian, thanks for your help with this.
>> Regards
>> Anil Patel
>> On Aug 24, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>>>> The organization data would be in DemoOrganizationData.xml.
>>>> -Adrian
>>>> --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> From: Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data
>>>>> To: [hidden email]
>>>>> Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 9:57 PM
>>>>> Hello Adrian,
>>>>> The hierarchy looks good to me. One quick question:
>>>>> -- Are you thinking to maintain the relevant data in a
>>>>> SINGLE file?
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ashish
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > The current demo data sets up a single company with a
>>>>> handful of internal
>>>>> > organizations that could be considered departments
>>>>> > (DemoOrganizationData.xml). I would like to expand
>>>>> this demo data to make it
>>>>> > more enterprise-like.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The organization would look like:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Company
>>>>> > Divison A
>>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>>> > Employees
>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>> > Etc
>>>>> > Sales Department
>>>>> > Employees
>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>> > Etc
>>>>> > Division B
>>>>> > Branch 1
>>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>>> > Employees
>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>> > Etc
>>>>> > Sales Department
>>>>> > Employees
>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>> > Etc
>>>>> > Branch 2
>>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>>> > Employees
>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>> > Etc
>>>>> > Sales Department
>>>>> > Employees
>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>> > Etc
>>>>> >
>>>>> > What do you think?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -Adrian
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>

Adrian Crum
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data

Adrian Crum
That would be great! I'll work on it tonight.

-Adrian

Anil Patel wrote:

> Adrian,
> I'll try to get other needed stuff in there.
>
> Regards
> Anil Patel
>
> On Aug 24, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
>> For now I will just create the party hierarchy. I don't know that I
>> will have time to set up separate accounting.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> Anil Patel wrote:
>>> This data enhancement will help a lot with testing Accounting module
>>> reports and gl postings where each division has their own books.
>>> Adrian, thanks for your help with this.
>>> Regards
>>> Anil Patel
>>> On Aug 24, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> The organization data would be in DemoOrganizationData.xml.
>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>> --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Ashish Vijaywargiya
>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>> From: Ashish Vijaywargiya <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Discussion: Expanded Party Demo Data
>>>>>> To: [hidden email]
>>>>>> Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 9:57 PM
>>>>>> Hello Adrian,
>>>>>> The hierarchy looks good to me. One quick question:
>>>>>> -- Are you thinking to maintain the relevant data in a
>>>>>> SINGLE file?
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ashish
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > The current demo data sets up a single company with a
>>>>>> handful of internal
>>>>>> > organizations that could be considered departments
>>>>>> > (DemoOrganizationData.xml). I would like to expand
>>>>>> this demo data to make it
>>>>>> > more enterprise-like.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The organization would look like:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Company
>>>>>> > Divison A
>>>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>>>> > Employees
>>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>>> > Etc
>>>>>> > Sales Department
>>>>>> > Employees
>>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>>> > Etc
>>>>>> > Division B
>>>>>> > Branch 1
>>>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>>>> > Employees
>>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>>> > Etc
>>>>>> > Sales Department
>>>>>> > Employees
>>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>>> > Etc
>>>>>> > Branch 2
>>>>>> > Accounting Department
>>>>>> > Employees
>>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>>> > Etc
>>>>>> > Sales Department
>>>>>> > Employees
>>>>>> > Suppliers
>>>>>> > Etc
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > What do you think?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -Adrian
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>
>
>
Free forum by Nabble Edit this page