Eclipse Classpath in SVN release

[BJ Freeman]

Looks like the classpath has two configurations in it.
Mine and .r511094
there are some extra characters.
I am using Eclipse 3.2.1.
Currently the project does not show the src folders seperate from the other files.
But removing one of the configurations and the extra text, I do get the seperate
src folders.
it this going to be normal?

[David E Jones]

Sounds like you have a local update conflict. What is the status on  
the file when you do an "svn st"?

-David


On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:21 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:

> Looks like the classpath has two configurations in it.
> Mine and .r511094
> there are some extra characters.
> I am using Eclipse 3.2.1.
> Currently the project does not show the src folders seperate from  
> the other files.
> But removing one of the configurations and the extra text, I do get  
> the seperate src folders.
> it this going to be normal?
>

[Scott Gray]

while we're talking about the .classpath file could a committer with the
relevant permissions please make an entry for the assetmaint source files.

Thanks
Scott

On 28/02/07, David E. Jones <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> Sounds like you have a local update conflict. What is the status on
> the file when you do an "svn st"?
>
> -David
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:21 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
> > Looks like the classpath has two configurations in it.
> > Mine and .r511094
> > there are some extra characters.
> > I am using Eclipse 3.2.1.
> > Currently the project does not show the src folders seperate from
> > the other files.
> > But removing one of the configurations and the extra text, I do get
> > the seperate src folders.
> > it this going to be normal?
> >
>
>
>

[BJ Freeman]

viewing in Eclipse it shows
.classpath 509773 2/20/07 jonesde

David E. Jones wrote:

>
> Sounds like you have a local update conflict. What is the status on the
> file when you do an "svn st"?
>
> -David
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:21 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
>> Looks like the classpath has two configurations in it.
>> Mine and .r511094
>> there are some extra characters.
>> I am using Eclipse 3.2.1.
>> Currently the project does not show the src folders seperate from the
>> other files.
>> But removing one of the configurations and the extra text, I do get
>> the seperate src folders.
>> it this going to be normal?
>>
>

[David E Jones]

Scott: I added the hhfacility and assetmaint src directories to  
the .classpath file. Thanks for the heads up on those.

-David


On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Scott Gray wrote:

> while we're talking about the .classpath file could a committer  
> with the
> relevant permissions please make an entry for the assetmaint source  
> files.
>
> Thanks
> Scott
>
> On 28/02/07, David E. Jones <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sounds like you have a local update conflict. What is the status on
>> the file when you do an "svn st"?
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:21 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like the classpath has two configurations in it.
>> > Mine and .r511094
>> > there are some extra characters.
>> > I am using Eclipse 3.2.1.
>> > Currently the project does not show the src folders seperate from
>> > the other files.
>> > But removing one of the configurations and the extra text, I do get
>> > the seperate src folders.
>> > it this going to be normal?
>> >
>>
>>
>>

[Adrian Crum]

BJ,

How has your experience been with v 3.2? The reason I ask is, the 3.1
installation you prepared for me last year works flawlessly. A 3.2 installation
that I installed and configured myself is very buggy.

-Adrian

BJ Freeman wrote:

> viewing in Eclipse it shows
> .classpath 509773 2/20/07 jonesde
>
> David E. Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> Sounds like you have a local update conflict. What is the status on
>> the file when you do an "svn st"?
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:21 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like the classpath has two configurations in it.
>>> Mine and .r511094
>>> there are some extra characters.
>>> I am using Eclipse 3.2.1.
>>> Currently the project does not show the src folders seperate from the
>>> other files.
>>> But removing one of the configurations and the extra text, I do get
>>> the seperate src folders.
>>> it this going to be normal?
>>>
>>
>
>