|
|
Most likely, I was trying to keep the commit specific to removing
Javolution, so I didn't make any other changes.
Aside from removing Javolution, I did some other work to make parts of
the EE immutable. I didn't finish that work because some parts of the EE
would require major rewrites, and also because I ran out of free time.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 6/18/2014 3:53 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> I noticed that Adrian removed most of javolution from the entity engine,
> just over a year ago. One of the uses was the ObjectFactory pattern.
> That is good. However, that change still made use of generic do-nothing
> constructors, and init() helper methods.
>
> Is there any particular reason to keep doing things that way? I'd like
> to see conditions become immutable; it would prevent thinkos like I have
> discovered while investigating OFBIZ-5659.
|
Locked
