Framework Independence

[Adrian Crum-2]

The security-related UI artifacts have been moved to the common component and the Web Tools app now has a security UI in rev 1053259.

The Party Manager Security tab duplicates the new Web Tools screens, and it is redundant - but I left it in there. It might be eligible for removal. I also left the original widget files in the partmgr component in case we need to go back to them for some reason. If all goes well, I will delete them in the future.

-Adrian

--- On Sat, 12/18/10, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I will be working on that today.
>
> -Adrian
>
> --- On Sat, 12/18/10, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > IMO the best way to go at this point
> > is to move the ui for the administration of user
> logins and
> > permissions from the party to the webtools web
> application.
> > In this way, in a framework only setup, we will have
> some
> > screens to create new user accounts and administer
> them. I
> > don't think that we have to provide screens addressed
> to
> > users (not administrators) to manage their user
> preferences:
> > the nature of this ui would be too much dependent on
> the
> > nature of the custom applications that will be used
> with the
> > framework.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
> > On Dec 18, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> >
> > > By clicking on the party's name in the header the
> user
> > is directed to this
> > > screen:
> > > https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/viewprofile?partyId=admin
> > >
> > > Here there are lots of links and information
> related
> > to all kind of things:
> > > orders, invoices, visits etc.
> > > In a framework-only installation this screen
> should
> > only allow the user to
> > > access to its personal information, password,
> > preferences etc.
> > > How could we get this?
> > > Could we replace this screen with a (non
> > user-editable) PortalPage where
> > > every installed application could add their
> > screenlets?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > 2010/12/16 David E Jones <[hidden email]>
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making
> the
> > framework more (or
> > >> totally) independent from the applications
> and
> > specialpurpose components.
> > >> The only question is the best way to do that,
> and
> > it looks like as far as a
> > >> general approach goes (moving minimal needed
> parts
> > from application
> > >> components to framework components) a fair
> > consensus is being reached
> > >> quickly.
> > >>
> > >> Of course, this is helped by lots of
> previous
> > discussion on this topic.
> > >>
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Dec 15, 2010, at 10:47 AM, BJ Freeman
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I don't think you will find a consensus
> so
> > just need to branch your own
> > >> frame work as I did.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> =========================
> > >>> BJ Freeman
> > >>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier
> > Automation  <
> > >> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
> > >>> Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
> > >>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
> > >>>
> > >>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Adrian Crum sent the following on
> 12/15/2010
> > 10:40 AM:
> > >>>> To clarify, I'm trying to get the
> > components in the framework folder to
> > >>>> run by themselves - without the
> components
> > found in the applications
> > >>>> folder. Some of the framework
> components
> > have UIs.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I understand everyone has a
> different
> > opinion on what constitutes a
> > >>>> framework, so I don't want to rehash
> that
> > discussion. I just want to
> > >>>> disable the components in the
> applications
> > folder and still have OFBiz
> > >> run.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Adrian
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman
> wrote:
> > >>>>> first question is should there be
> any
> > UI activity at the framework
> > >> level.
> > >>>>> Should not it just be the support
> to
> > allow a UI system to put
> > >> installed.
> > >>>>> when I mean UI I am talking about
> any
> > interaction to the user.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> =========================
> > >>>>> BJ Freeman
> > >>>>> Strategic Power Office with
> Supplier
> > Automation
> > >>>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
> > >>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
> > >>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to
> Assist
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Adrian Crum sent the following
> on
> > 12/15/2010 9:52 AM:
> > >>>>>> I'm working on a project
> that
> > requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm
> > >>>>>> trying to get a
> framework-only
> > installation to run.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> There are a lot of
> dependencies on
> > the party and content components.
> > >>>>>> Removing dependencies on the
> party
> > component should be fairly easy.
> > >> The
> > >>>>>> online help system uses the
> > content component, so that is an issue.
> > >>>>>> Should we move the content
> > component to the framework?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Adrian
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>