Freemarker deprecated built-ins
Locked
Freemarker deprecated built-ins
 
Administrator
|
Hi All,
Why do you think about updating all our templates following http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? At least the second and the third could be done automatically. Jacques |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
+1
Vikas On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Why do you think about updating all our templates following > http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? > At least the second and the third could be done automatically. > > Jacques |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a big deal, but please express yourself Thanks Jacques From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> > +1 > > Vikas > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >> >> Jacques > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably use this version as explained in the link below. We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! > ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do > it now, maybe in a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... > > I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a big deal, but please express yourself > > Thanks > > Jacques > > From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >> +1 >> >> Vikas >> >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>> >>> Jacques >> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
|
I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me. -- Ashish On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available > http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html > It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably > use this version as explained in the link below. > We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... > > BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : > http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > > I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and >> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more >> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in >> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >> >> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a >> big deal, but please express yourself >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Vikas >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>> >>> >> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html > It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably use this version as explained in the link below. > We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... Ooops, this remark makes no sense forget it. I understood Freemarker explanation the wrong side. Actually the deprecated ?default builtin will behave better in future. Those guys are serious : they enhance deprecated builtins ;o) Jacques > BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do >> it now, maybe in a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >> >> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a big deal, but please express yourself >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>> +1 >>> >>> Vikas >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>> >>>> Jacques >>> >> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Ashish Vijaywargiya
BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions before.
Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on Linux before). Jacques From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. > Its working fine for me. > > -- > Ashish > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably >> use this version as explained in the link below. >> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >> >> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> >> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and >>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more >>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in >>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>> >>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a >>> big deal, but please express yourself >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Vikas >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
|
Jacques,
are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I did something wrong). Jacopo On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August > 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions before. > Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on > Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on Linux before). > > Jacques > > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >> Its working fine for me. >> -- >> Ashish >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should >>> preferably >>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>> >>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> >>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? >>> exists and >>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some >>>> more >>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it >>>> now, maybe in >>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>> >>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) >>>> it's not a >>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Vikas >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
|
Jacopo ,
Why don't you use Subclipse ? Do you think Subversive is good ? I downloaded the Eclipse Ganymede(www.eclipse.org) launced on 25th June and using Subclipse for SVN thing. Ganymede is perfect and working fine on my Linux box. -- Ashish On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]> wrote: > Jacques, > > are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the > "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I did > something wrong). > > Jacopo > > > On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In >> my opininon it's really better than any versions before. Not only in term of >> features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many >> issues - if any - on Linux before). >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >> >>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>> Its working fine for me. >>> -- >>> Ashish >>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably >>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>> >>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>> >>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and >>>> >>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more >>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, >>>>> maybe in >>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>> >>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not >>>>> a >>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Vikas >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
|
Ashish,
the main reason is that I couldn't find the Subclipse plugin for Ganymede... but maybe I've just missed it. Do you have a link to download it? Thanks, Jacopo On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: > Jacopo , > > Why don't you use Subclipse ? > Do you think Subversive is good ? > > I downloaded the Eclipse Ganymede(www.eclipse.org) launced on 25th > June and > using Subclipse for SVN thing. > Ganymede is perfect and working fine on my Linux box. > > -- > Ashish > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Jacques, >> >> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the >> "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I did >> something wrong). >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August >> 2007). In >>> my opininon it's really better than any versions before. Not only >>> in term of >>> features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have >>> many >>> issues - if any - on Linux before). >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>> >>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>>> Its working fine for me. >>>> -- >>>> Ashish >>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should >>>>> preferably >>>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>>> >>>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss >>>>> IDE : >>>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>> >>>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? >>>>> exists and >>>>> >>>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing >>>>>> some more >>>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it >>>>>> now, >>>>>> maybe in >>>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>>> >>>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) >>>>>> it's not >>>>>> a >>>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vikas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
|
Jacopo,
Here is the link for the Subclipse installation. http://subclipse.tigris.org/install.html You should select first option from step 4. Name: Subclipse 1.2.x (Eclipse 3.2+) URL: http://subclipse.tigris.org/update_1.2.x If I am right you are using Mac Notebook. Right ? If Yes , Jacopo please let me know your thoughts on Eclipse Ganymede on Mac Notebook. -- Ashish On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]> wrote: > Ashish, > > the main reason is that I couldn't find the Subclipse plugin for > Ganymede... but maybe I've just missed it. Do you have a link to download > it? > > Thanks, > > Jacopo > > > On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: > > Jacopo , >> >> Why don't you use Subclipse ? >> Do you think Subversive is good ? >> >> I downloaded the Eclipse Ganymede(www.eclipse.org) launced on 25th June >> and >> using Subclipse for SVN thing. >> Ganymede is perfect and working fine on my Linux box. >> >> -- >> Ashish >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Jacques, >>> >>> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the >>> "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I did >>> something wrong). >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> >>> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In >>> >>>> my opininon it's really better than any versions before. Not only in >>>> term of >>>> features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many >>>> issues - if any - on Linux before). >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>> >>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>>>> Its working fine for me. >>>>> -- >>>>> Ashish >>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should >>>>>> preferably >>>>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>>>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >>>>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists >>>>>> and >>>>>> >>>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some >>>>>>> more >>>>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, >>>>>>> maybe in >>>>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vikas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
|
Thanks Ashish,
it worked like a charm... and yes, I am using a Mac and now I will switch to Ganymede and I will let you know how it works (it seems really good for now). Sorry for the off topic for the dev list. Jacopo On Jun 27, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: > Jacopo, > > Here is the link for the Subclipse installation. > http://subclipse.tigris.org/install.html > > You should select first option from step 4. > > Name: Subclipse 1.2.x (Eclipse 3.2+) > URL: http://subclipse.tigris.org/update_1.2.x > > > If I am right you are using Mac Notebook. > Right ? > If Yes , Jacopo please let me know your thoughts on Eclipse Ganymede > on Mac > Notebook. > > -- > Ashish > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Ashish, >> >> the main reason is that I couldn't find the Subclipse plugin for >> Ganymede... but maybe I've just missed it. Do you have a link to >> download >> it? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >> >> Jacopo , >>> >>> Why don't you use Subclipse ? >>> Do you think Subversive is good ? >>> >>> I downloaded the Eclipse Ganymede(www.eclipse.org) launced on 25th >>> June >>> and >>> using Subclipse for SVN thing. >>> Ganymede is perfect and working fine on my Linux box. >>> >>> -- >>> Ashish >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Jacques, >>>> >>>> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the >>>> "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I >>>> did >>>> something wrong). >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> >>>> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August >>>> 2007). In >>>> >>>>> my opininon it's really better than any versions before. Not >>>>> only in >>>>> term of >>>>> features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not >>>>> have many >>>>> issues - if any - on Linux before). >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>> >>>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>>>>> Its working fine for me. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ashish >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>>>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should >>>>>>> preferably >>>>>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>>>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss >>>>>>> IDE : >>>>>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? >>>>>>> exists >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing >>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it >>>>>>>> now, >>>>>>>> maybe in >>>>>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? >>>>>>>> and !) it's >>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vikas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done >>>>>>>>>> automatically. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-3
Jacopo,
I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one but not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7). I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry later by importing projects one by one... On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I used the J2EE distro. I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I think I'm still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine) I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to M3 then M4 and finally M7... Jacqiues From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]> > Jacques, > > are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I > did something wrong). > > Jacopo > > On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions >> before. Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on Linux >> before). >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>> Its working fine for me. >>> -- >>> Ashish >>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably >>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>> >>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>> >>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? exists and >>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more >>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in >>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>> >>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a >>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Vikas >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
The current builtins work well and are easy to read. I finally decided to do nothing. We will see if ever it's needed.
Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> Hi All, Why do you think about updating all our templates following http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? At least the second and the third could be done automatically. Jacques |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all worked without any issues
Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > Jacopo, > > I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one but > not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7). > I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some > indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry later > by importing projects one by one... > > On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I used > the J2EE distro. > I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I think I'm still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine) > > I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to > M3 then M4 and finally M7... > > Jacqiues > > From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]> >> Jacques, >> >> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I >> did something wrong). >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions >>> before. Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on Linux >>> before). >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>>> Its working fine for me. >>>> -- >>>> Ashish >>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably >>>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>>> >>>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>> >>>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? exists and >>>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more >>>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in >>>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>>> >>>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a >>>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vikas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
For those who have pretty big workspaces (many projects) with some plugins (moreover in my case, I was using 3.4 milestones from
months, maybe straight from 3.3 it's ok) Actually it was not Classic that I used but the pure 3.4 SDK (ie without any plugins). I had problems with all other brands. You may find it from the Download Classic line, look for " Eclipse Project download page." Then I used the new P2 Update Manager, very nice. HTH Jacques ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 10:57 AM Subject: Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins > This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all worked without any issues > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> Jacopo, >> >> I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one but >> not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7). >> I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some >> indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry later >> by importing projects one by one... >> >> On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I >> used the J2EE distro. >> I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I think I'm still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine) >> >> I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to >> M3 then M4 and finally M7... >> >> Jacqiues >> >> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]> >>> Jacques, >>> >>> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are >>> I >>> did something wrong). >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>>> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions >>>> before. Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on >>>> Linux >>>> before). >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>>>> Its working fine for me. >>>>> -- >>>>> Ashish >>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably >>>>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>>>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >>>>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? exists and >>>>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more >>>>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in >>>>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a >>>>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vikas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
Administrator
|
Last but not least : I have just discovered by chance the Eclipse Save Actions preference. I put a tip there :
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Eclipse+Tips#EclipseTips-Setting%22SaveActions%22Preference. I think it's worth it ! Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > For those who have pretty big workspaces (many projects) with some plugins (moreover in my case, I was using 3.4 milestones from > months, maybe straight from 3.3 it's ok) > Actually it was not Classic that I used but the pure 3.4 SDK (ie without any plugins). I had problems with all other brands. You > may > find it from the Download Classic line, look for " Eclipse Project download page." > Then I used the new P2 Update Manager, very nice. > > HTH > > Jacques > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 10:57 AM > Subject: Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins > > >> This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all worked without any issues >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> Jacopo, >>> >>> I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one >>> but >>> not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7). >>> I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some >>> indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry >>> later >>> by importing projects one by one... >>> >>> On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I >>> used the J2EE distro. >>> I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I think I'm still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine) >>> >>> I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to >>> M3 then M4 and finally M7... >>> >>> Jacqiues >>> >>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]> >>>> Jacques, >>>> >>>> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are >>>> I >>>> did something wrong). >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> >>>>> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions >>>>> before. Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on >>>>> Linux >>>>> before). >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>>>>> Its working fine for me. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ashish >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>>>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably >>>>>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>>>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>>>>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? exists and >>>>>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more >>>>>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in >>>>>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a >>>>>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vikas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
|
|
Jacques,
I also noticed this while I was reading the new feature in the Eclipse Ganymede. But its only for Java code :-). The important feature on the image you attached is that "Now eclipse format only the edited lines instead of formating the whole java files". Anyway thanks for sharing it. -- Ashish On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Last but not least : I have just discovered by chance the Eclipse Save > Actions preference. I put a tip there : > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Eclipse+Tips#EclipseTips-Setting%22SaveActions%22Preference. > I think it's worth it ! > > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > >> For those who have pretty big workspaces (many projects) with some plugins >> (moreover in my case, I was using 3.4 milestones from >> months, maybe straight from 3.3 it's ok) >> Actually it was not Classic that I used but the pure 3.4 SDK (ie without >> any plugins). I had problems with all other brands. You >> may >> find it from the Download Classic line, look for " Eclipse Project >> download page." >> Then I used the new P2 Update Manager, very nice. >> >> HTH >> >> Jacques >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" < >> [hidden email]> >> To: <[hidden email]> >> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 10:57 AM >> Subject: Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins >> >> >> This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all >>> worked without any issues >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> >>>> Jacopo, >>>> >>>> I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used >>>> the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one >>>> but >>>> not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a >>>> charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7). >>>> I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at >>>> large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some >>>> indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to >>>> load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry >>>> later >>>> by importing projects one by one... >>>> >>>> On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so >>>> far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I >>>> used the J2EE distro. >>>> I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I >>>> think I'm still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine) >>>> >>>> I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something >>>> wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to >>>> M3 then M4 and finally M7... >>>> >>>> Jacqiues >>>> >>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]> >>>> >>>>> Jacques, >>>>> >>>>> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the >>>>> "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are >>>>> I >>>>> did something wrong). >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August >>>>>> 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions >>>>>> before. Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least >>>>>> on Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on >>>>>> Linux >>>>>> before). >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>>>>>> Its working fine for me. >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>>>>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should >>>>>>>> preferably >>>>>>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>>>>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>>>>>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>>>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? >>>>>>>> exists and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>>>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some >>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, >>>>>>>>> maybe in >>>>>>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) >>>>>>>>> it's not a >>>>>>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vikas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
«
Return to OFBiz - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |