Freemarker
Locked
 
Administrator
|
Hi,
We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 Jacques PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) |
|
I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful.
I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. Jacopo On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 > > Jacques > PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) |
|
|
Yeah, I saw both mails. Ofbiz is at the top of my list now. Rest of
the day. However, OFBIZ-5659 is first, as it breaks existing functionality(has done so for 2 years). On 06/18/2014 04:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. > I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. > > Jacopo > > On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >> >> Jacques >> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
FYI:
I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. Jacopo On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: > I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. > I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. > > Jacopo > > On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >> >> Jacques >> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) > |
|
Administrator
|
Good news, thanks Jacopo!
Jacques Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > FYI: > > I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. > > Jacopo > > On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>> >>> Jacques >>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) > > -- |
|
|
It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good test coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its much less prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance that you need to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany
Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> írta: >Good news, thanks Jacopo! > >Jacques > >Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >> FYI: >> >> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >> >> > >-- |
|
|
I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the trunk in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT?
Jacopo On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <[hidden email]> wrote: > It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good test coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its much less prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance that you need to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany > Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> írta: >> Good news, thanks Jacopo! >> >> Jacques >> >> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>> FYI: >>> >>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >>> >>> >> >> -- |
|
|
That's fine as far as I'm concerned. (Update from GitHub and rebuild if that's not a problem.) Thanks, Daniel Dekany
Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> írta: >I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the trunk in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT? > >Jacopo > >On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good test coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its much less prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance that you need to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany >> Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> írta: >>> Good news, thanks Jacopo! >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>> FYI: >>>> >>>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- > |
|
|
sure, I will.
Thanks, Jacopo On Jun 23, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Dékány Dániel <[hidden email]> wrote: > That's fine as far as I'm concerned. (Update from GitHub and rebuild if that's not a problem.) Thanks, Daniel Dekany > Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> írta: >> I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the trunk in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT? >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good test coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its much less prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance that you need to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany >>> Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> írta: >>>> Good news, thanks Jacopo! >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>> FYI: >>>>> >>>>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>>>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >> |
|
|
Thanks Jacopo for looking into this. I haven't had time to jump back in
to this old bug, I've been distracted on that other issue(keep finding more problems). On 06/23/2014 10:20 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > sure, I will. > > Thanks, > > Jacopo > > On Jun 23, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Dékány Dániel <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> That's fine as far as I'm concerned. (Update from GitHub and rebuild if that's not a problem.) Thanks, Daniel Dekany >> Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> írta: >>> I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the trunk in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT? >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good test coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its much less prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance that you need to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany >>>> Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> írta: >>>>> Good news, thanks Jacopo! >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>>> FYI: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>>>>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >>>>>> >>>>> -- |
|
|
Am feeling good to use the release.
Is there any chance(s) to hack the OfBiz based site/atleast OfBiz demo site of the new release. -- A Question for God every morning. What is the main event today? What do you want me to focus on today? God Speed... Thanks & Regards Prabhakar Balakrishna +91-88977-49482 |
|
|
I would like to know David E Jones is still working for OFBiz project.
-- A Question for God every morning. What is the main event today? What do you want me to focus on today? God Speed... Thanks & Regards Prabhakar Balakrishna +91-88977-49482 |
|
|
Prabhakar
This is odd question. Is there some thing very specific that you need? Thanks and Regards Anil Patel COO Hotwax Media Inc http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/ ApacheCon US 2014 Silver Sponsor http://na.apachecon.com/sponsor/our-sponsors Sent from my iPad > On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Prabhakar Balakrishna <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I would like to know David E Jones is still working for OFBiz project. > > -- > > > A Question for God every morning. > What is the main event today? What do you want me to focus on today? > God Speed... > Thanks & Regards > Prabhakar Balakrishna > +91-88977-49482 |
|
|
Dear Anil,
Am eagerly waiting to answer for the technical question Posted by me. Every one please ignore my last question about David.I sent it to wrong address. -- A Question for God every morning. What is the main event today? What do you want me to focus on today? God Speed... Thanks & Regards Prabhakar Balakrishna +91-88977-49482 |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
This is now committed to the trunk with rev. 1605029
Jacopo On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: > sure, I will. > > Thanks, > > Jacopo > > On Jun 23, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Dékány Dániel <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> That's fine as far as I'm concerned. (Update from GitHub and rebuild if that's not a problem.) Thanks, Daniel Dekany >> Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> írta: >>> I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the trunk in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT? >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good test coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its much less prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance that you need to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany >>>> Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> írta: >>>>> Good news, thanks Jacopo! >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>>> FYI: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>>>>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to say. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>> > |
«
Return to OFBiz - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |