> After a 2 second glance it looks interesting enough to bookmark. Based on my current wish list I should be able to comment further in 2012 :-)
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> HotWax Media
>
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com>
> On 16/06/2010, at 1:18 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>
>> I think you make a really great point here. JQuery is a utility not a
>> framework and when it comes to utility it really delivers the goods.
>>
>> Looking back to Dojo, I still believe we need something to counter the
>> GWT-EXT "threat" because users continue to demand an "application" feel
>> when it comes to ERP. I find Vaadin (vaadin.com) very interesting, if
>> somewhat daunting in scale. It appears to offer the level of abstraction
>> necessary to integrate the screen and form widget systems and is under
>> the Apache License (which makes it very, very interesting). Has anyone
>> else looked seriously at Vaadin?
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Looks like we have a good consensus around Jquery so far.
>>>
>>> I must say that the main arugment for Dojo was its serious. It's a
>>> real consistent framework with embedded widgets, not only an API. All
>>> those third parties Jquery's widgets (and Prototypes's) are a bit
>>> frightening. On the other hand when you want to upgrade to 1.4 you
>>> find that it's not as serious as we thought, and I'm *very
>>> disapointed* about that. And as those widgets are open source, it's
>>> not as frightening as it 1st seems. For instance, we use a third party
>>> calendar and we have already poked in (for layered lookups) without
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> At the time we decided to embed Doo and Prototype some pointed also
>>> Jquery with good arguments [1] [2][3]. At this time we decided that
>>> anyway we were not tied to any Ajax frameworks yet.
>>>
>>> So yes, +1 for me also, especially now that Sascha wants to tackle it,
>>> and I'm sure we will support his effort!
>>>
>>> Thanks guys
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>> [1] Yoav Shapira in 2006:
http://markmail.org/message/ftw7pjfrzxyxmsuz>>> [2] Ean in 2007
http://markmail.org/message/jf5qvxblvrbmtvae (and we
>>> know now than when there is a dual licensing we can pick the one we
>>> want, here MIT :o)
>>> [3] Ean in 2007
http://markmail.org/message/vqjjtribdrulhbl3. When the
>>> serious one is less serious than the other (demo in time). Dojo is
>>> known to have documentation problems also... Found this link
>>>
http://www.ajaxdaddy.com/demo-dojo-fisheye.html>> --
>> Ean Schuessler, CTO
>>
[hidden email]
>> 214-720-0700 x 315
>> Brainfood, Inc.
>>
http://www.brainfood.com>>
>
Locked
