Fwd: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

[Sanjay Yadav]

Yes, Taher. It will be in Selenium.

Moving this email thread to the dev mailing list. Thanks!

Best Regards,

*Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
<http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Taher Alkhateeb <[hidden email]>
Date: Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation
To: <[hidden email]>


Hello, is this going to be implemented in Selenium? If yes then
perhaps we should move this discussion to dev@ to make sure we get
this right. Functional tests might be very slow and so we might need
to decide whether to include these tests by default with the
"testIntegration" task for example.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:53 AM Rishi Solanki <[hidden email]>
wrote:

>
> +1, and yes go for 17.12 + Trunk. And first pick the 17.12 as it would be
> stable compare to trunk,
>
>
> --
> Rishi Solanki
> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> Direct: [phone]
> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> www.hotwax.co
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM Sanjay Yadav <

[hidden email]>

> wrote:
>
> > Yes, Michael:).Thanks.
> >
> > Thanks, Jacques.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> > Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Michael Brohl <[hidden email]
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Sanjay,
> > >
> > > as I mentioned in
> > >
> > >
> >

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test?focusedCommentId=71014351#comment-71014351

> > > ;-)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Michael Brohl
> > > ecomify GmbH
> > > www.ecomify.de
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 22.08.18 um 08:22 schrieb Sanjay Yadav:
> > > > Hello All,
> > > >
> > > > I am planning to automate below sanity test script. Please feel

free to

> > > > share your thoughts.
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test
> > > >
> > > > Which OFBiz version I should target?
> > > > Do I need to create a JIRA ticket before starting on it?
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> > > > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> > > > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> > > > Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >

[Nicolas Malin-2]

Hello,

I appreciate the work done around the sanity test, just I have a doubt
about integrate them to testIntegration target.

I'm more in favor to ensure that we have unit test on service involve by
these sanity test, and if you want offer the possibility to run it by an
automation like selenium, load it as plugin.

Nicolas


On 23/08/2018 13:08, Sanjay Yadav wrote:

> Yes, Taher. It will be in Selenium.
>
> Moving this email thread to the dev mailing list. Thanks!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Taher Alkhateeb <[hidden email]>
> Date: Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:39 PM
> Subject: Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation
> To: <[hidden email]>
>
>
> Hello, is this going to be implemented in Selenium? If yes then
> perhaps we should move this discussion to dev@ to make sure we get
> this right. Functional tests might be very slow and so we might need
> to decide whether to include these tests by default with the
> "testIntegration" task for example.
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:53 AM Rishi Solanki <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>> +1, and yes go for 17.12 + Trunk. And first pick the 17.12 as it would be
>> stable compare to trunk,
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rishi Solanki
>> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
>> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
>> Direct: [phone]
>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
>> www.hotwax.co
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM Sanjay Yadav <
> [hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, Michael:).Thanks.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Jacques.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Michael Brohl <[hidden email]
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 Sanjay,
>>>>
>>>> as I mentioned in
>>>>
>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test?focusedCommentId=71014351#comment-71014351
>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>> ecomify GmbH
>>>> www.ecomify.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 22.08.18 um 08:22 schrieb Sanjay Yadav:
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am planning to automate below sanity test script. Please feel
> free to
>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test
>>>>>
>>>>> Which OFBiz version I should target?
>>>>> Do I need to create a JIRA ticket before starting on it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>>>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>>>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>>>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>>>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

[Jacques Le Roux]

That makes sense Nicolas,

Jacques


Le 23/08/2018 à 14:08, Nicolas Malin a écrit :

> Hello,
>
> I appreciate the work done around the sanity test, just I have a doubt about integrate them to testIntegration target.
>
> I'm more in favor to ensure that we have unit test on service involve by these sanity test, and if you want offer the possibility to run it by an
> automation like selenium, load it as plugin.
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> On 23/08/2018 13:08, Sanjay Yadav wrote:
>> Yes, Taher. It will be in Selenium.
>>
>> Moving this email thread to the dev mailing list. Thanks!
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Taher Alkhateeb <[hidden email]>
>> Date: Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:39 PM
>> Subject: Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation
>> To: <[hidden email]>
>>
>>
>> Hello, is this going to be implemented in Selenium? If yes then
>> perhaps we should move this discussion to dev@ to make sure we get
>> this right. Functional tests might be very slow and so we might need
>> to decide whether to include these tests by default with the
>> "testIntegration" task for example.
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:53 AM Rishi Solanki <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>> +1, and yes go for 17.12 + Trunk. And first pick the 17.12 as it would be
>>> stable compare to trunk,
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rishi Solanki
>>> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
>>> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
>>> Direct: [phone]
>>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
>>> www.hotwax.co
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM Sanjay Yadav <
>> [hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, Michael:).Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Jacques.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Michael Brohl <[hidden email]
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 Sanjay,
>>>>>
>>>>> as I mentioned in
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test?focusedCommentId=71014351#comment-71014351
>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>>> ecomify GmbH
>>>>> www.ecomify.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 22.08.18 um 08:22 schrieb Sanjay Yadav:
>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am planning to automate below sanity test script. Please feel
>> free to
>>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which OFBiz version I should target?
>>>>>> Do I need to create a JIRA ticket before starting on it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>>>>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>>>>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>>>>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>>>>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>

[taher]

Hi Nicolas, all

Maybe before we take a decision on this, we should first investigate a
few things. For example:
- How fast are the tests?
- How stable and consistent are they?
- How much resources does it consume (memory, etc ...)

Then, based on the above information, perhaps it would be easier to
decide if we want to include or exclude them from testIntegration. I
agree with you in concept, these tests are more like functional tests
and less like integration tests. However, if we find them fast, light,
and stable enough, then I don't see a reason why not to include them.

So my recommendation is to seek the above information, and then take
one of following decisions:
- Include them in testIntegration
- Include them in a separate plugin like you suggested
- Include a new gradle task and alter the test container to have a
separate patch for testing functional tests
- Something else ...

My 2 cents
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:08 PM Nicolas Malin <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> I appreciate the work done around the sanity test, just I have a doubt
> about integrate them to testIntegration target.
>
> I'm more in favor to ensure that we have unit test on service involve by
> these sanity test, and if you want offer the possibility to run it by an
> automation like selenium, load it as plugin.
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> On 23/08/2018 13:08, Sanjay Yadav wrote:
> > Yes, Taher. It will be in Selenium.
> >
> > Moving this email thread to the dev mailing list. Thanks!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> > Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: Taher Alkhateeb <[hidden email]>
> > Date: Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation
> > To: <[hidden email]>
> >
> >
> > Hello, is this going to be implemented in Selenium? If yes then
> > perhaps we should move this discussion to dev@ to make sure we get
> > this right. Functional tests might be very slow and so we might need
> > to decide whether to include these tests by default with the
> > "testIntegration" task for example.
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:53 AM Rishi Solanki <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >> +1, and yes go for 17.12 + Trunk. And first pick the 17.12 as it would be
> >> stable compare to trunk,
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rishi Solanki
> >> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> >> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> >> Direct: [phone]
> >> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> >> www.hotwax.co
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM Sanjay Yadav <
> > [hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, Michael:).Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, Jacques.
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>>
> >>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> >>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> >>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> >>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> >>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Michael Brohl <[hidden email]
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 Sanjay,
> >>>>
> >>>> as I mentioned in
> >>>>
> >>>>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test?focusedCommentId=71014351#comment-71014351
> >>>> ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Michael Brohl
> >>>> ecomify GmbH
> >>>> www.ecomify.de
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 22.08.18 um 08:22 schrieb Sanjay Yadav:
> >>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am planning to automate below sanity test script. Please feel
> > free to
> >>>>> share your thoughts.
> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which OFBiz version I should target?
> >>>>> Do I need to create a JIRA ticket before starting on it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> >>>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> >>>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> >>>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> >>>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
>

[Nicolas Malin-2]

On 23/08/2018 14:24, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:

> Hi Nicolas, all
>
> Maybe before we take a decision on this, we should first investigate a
> few things. For example:
> - How fast are the tests?
> - How stable and consistent are they?
> - How much resources does it consume (memory, etc ...
>
> Then, based on the above information, perhaps it would be easier to
> decide if we want to include or exclude them from testIntegration. I
> agree with you in concept, these tests are more like functional tests
> and less like integration tests. However, if we find them fast, light,
> and stable enough, then I don't see a reason why not to include them.

Yes you right Taher, your approach is more logical than mine where I see
on selenium all nightmare weeks waste without gain.

I just imagine run a testIntergration and wait two hours that all is fine.

Nicolas

> So my recommendation is to seek the above information, and then take
> one of following decisions:
> - Include them in testIntegration
> - Include them in a separate plugin like you suggested
> - Include a new gradle task and alter the test container to have a
> separate patch for testing functional tests
> - Something else ...
>
> My 2 cents
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:08 PM Nicolas Malin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I appreciate the work done around the sanity test, just I have a doubt
>> about integrate them to testIntegration target.
>>
>> I'm more in favor to ensure that we have unit test on service involve by
>> these sanity test, and if you want offer the possibility to run it by an
>> automation like selenium, load it as plugin.
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>> On 23/08/2018 13:08, Sanjay Yadav wrote:
>>> Yes, Taher. It will be in Selenium.
>>>
>>> Moving this email thread to the dev mailing list. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: Taher Alkhateeb <[hidden email]>
>>> Date: Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:39 PM
>>> Subject: Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation
>>> To: <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello, is this going to be implemented in Selenium? If yes then
>>> perhaps we should move this discussion to dev@ to make sure we get
>>> this right. Functional tests might be very slow and so we might need
>>> to decide whether to include these tests by default with the
>>> "testIntegration" task for example.
>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:53 AM Rishi Solanki <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> +1, and yes go for 17.12 + Trunk. And first pick the 17.12 as it would be
>>>> stable compare to trunk,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rishi Solanki
>>>> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
>>>> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
>>>> Direct: [phone]
>>>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
>>>> www.hotwax.co
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM Sanjay Yadav <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, Michael:).Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Jacques.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>>>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>>>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>>>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>>>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Michael Brohl <[hidden email]
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 Sanjay,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as I mentioned in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test?focusedCommentId=71014351#comment-71014351
>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>>>> ecomify GmbH
>>>>>> www.ecomify.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 22.08.18 um 08:22 schrieb Sanjay Yadav:
>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am planning to automate below sanity test script. Please feel
>>> free to
>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which OFBiz version I should target?
>>>>>>> Do I need to create a JIRA ticket before starting on it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>>>>>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>>>>>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>>>>>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>>>>>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

[Gil Portenseigne]

Hello,

I tend to have the same reaction as Nicolas due to a bad personal
experience with selenium (unstable, hard to maintain...), but since it
may have evolved, Taher's remark make perfect sense.

Thanks for the proposal Sanjay !

Gil

Le jeudi 23 août 2018 à 15:24:01 (+0300), Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :

> Hi Nicolas, all
>
> Maybe before we take a decision on this, we should first investigate a
> few things. For example:
> - How fast are the tests?
> - How stable and consistent are they?
> - How much resources does it consume (memory, etc ...)
>
> Then, based on the above information, perhaps it would be easier to
> decide if we want to include or exclude them from testIntegration. I
> agree with you in concept, these tests are more like functional tests
> and less like integration tests. However, if we find them fast, light,
> and stable enough, then I don't see a reason why not to include them.
>
> So my recommendation is to seek the above information, and then take
> one of following decisions:
> - Include them in testIntegration
> - Include them in a separate plugin like you suggested
> - Include a new gradle task and alter the test container to have a
> separate patch for testing functional tests
> - Something else ...
>
> My 2 cents
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:08 PM Nicolas Malin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I appreciate the work done around the sanity test, just I have a doubt
> > about integrate them to testIntegration target.
> >
> > I'm more in favor to ensure that we have unit test on service involve by
> > these sanity test, and if you want offer the possibility to run it by an
> > automation like selenium, load it as plugin.
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> >
> > On 23/08/2018 13:08, Sanjay Yadav wrote:
> > > Yes, Taher. It will be in Selenium.
> > >
> > > Moving this email thread to the dev mailing list. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> > > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> > > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> > > Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > From: Taher Alkhateeb <[hidden email]>
> > > Date: Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:39 PM
> > > Subject: Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation
> > > To: <[hidden email]>
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello, is this going to be implemented in Selenium? If yes then
> > > perhaps we should move this discussion to dev@ to make sure we get
> > > this right. Functional tests might be very slow and so we might need
> > > to decide whether to include these tests by default with the
> > > "testIntegration" task for example.
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:53 AM Rishi Solanki <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >> +1, and yes go for 17.12 + Trunk. And first pick the 17.12 as it would be
> > >> stable compare to trunk,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Rishi Solanki
> > >> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> > >> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> > >> Direct: [phone]
> > >> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> > >> www.hotwax.co
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM Sanjay Yadav <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Yes, Michael:).Thanks.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks, Jacques.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best Regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> > >>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> > >>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > >>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> > >>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> > >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Michael Brohl <[hidden email]
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 Sanjay,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> as I mentioned in
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test?focusedCommentId=71014351#comment-71014351
> > >>>> ;-)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Michael Brohl
> > >>>> ecomify GmbH
> > >>>> www.ecomify.de
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Am 22.08.18 um 08:22 schrieb Sanjay Yadav:
> > >>>>> Hello All,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I am planning to automate below sanity test script. Please feel
> > > free to
> > >>>>> share your thoughts.
> > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Which OFBiz version I should target?
> > >>>>> Do I need to create a JIRA ticket before starting on it?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
> > >>>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> > >>>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > >>>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
> > >>>>> Mobile Phone: [phone] | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
> > >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >