Done.
Thank you for working on this. It is truly needed.
-Adrian
On 7/24/2012 12:22 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> thanks for the enhancements; I don't have local changes at the moment so feel free to proceed.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
>> I committed some small changes in rev 1364972. I apologize for stepping on your work - I thought it would be quicker to make them myself than to describe them in an email.
>>
>> I also have GenericDispatcher moved to a GenericDispatcherFactory inner class on my local copy. I can commit that too if it doesn't interfere with your work.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> On 7/24/2012 10:18 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> On Jul 22, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>
>>>>> From my perspective, the GenericDispatcher.getLocalDispatcher method should not exist - since it forces you to reference an implementation. Instead, there should be a separate service dispatcher factory.
>>> This is now implemented in rev. 1364952
Locked
