Help for running test cases and test suites in tasks list

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Help for running test cases and test suites in tasks list

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi,

We don't have a documentation quickly accessible for "gradlew 'ofbiz -help'" (aka"java -jar build\libs\ofbiz.jar -h") when using "gradlew ta"

It's missing when you want to know the syntax for running test cases and test suites without having to look into the README.md file (and remember it's
there)

Could we not adding it, as an example, to <<Pattern: ofbiz <Commands>: Execute OFBiz startup commands ?>>

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Help for running test cases and test suites in tasks list

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Le 25/03/2017 à 11:59, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> We don't have a documentation quickly accessible for "gradlew 'ofbiz -help'" (aka"java -jar build\libs\ofbiz.jar -h") when using "gradlew ta"
>
> It's missing when you want to know the syntax for running test cases and test suites without having to look into the README.md file (and remember
> it's there)
>
> Could we not adding it, as an example, to <<Pattern: ofbiz <Commands>: Execute OFBiz startup commands ?>>
>
> Jacques
>
>
This message is 5 days old now, so I think I can take that as a consensus. Or should I wait next week, or?

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Help for running test cases and test suites in tasks list

Jacopo Cappellato-5
I think this is similar to another question you have asked in a Jira
ticket, for which you already got some feedback. Please correct me if I am
wrong

Jacopo

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Le 25/03/2017 à 11:59, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We don't have a documentation quickly accessible for "gradlew 'ofbiz
>> -help'" (aka"java -jar build\libs\ofbiz.jar -h") when using "gradlew ta"
>>
>> It's missing when you want to know the syntax for running test cases and
>> test suites without having to look into the README.md file (and remember
>> it's there)
>>
>> Could we not adding it, as an example, to <<Pattern: ofbiz <Commands>:
>> Execute OFBiz startup commands ?>>
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> This message is 5 days old now, so I think I can take that as a
> consensus. Or should I wait next week, or?
>
> Jacques
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Help for running test cases and test suites in tasks list

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Yes it's similar than OFBIZ-9274 "Add parameters information into Gradle tasks descriptions"

The difference is, being rebuffed by Taher and you and nobody else being interested, I'll certainly close the Jira as Invalid or smthg like that; but
would at least like to be able to quickly know, from the CLI, the syntax to run tests an test-suites.

That's not something I use often and find hard to remember that I should call gradlew "ofbiz -help" (is there 2 --, none, is it help, h, or ? etc.?)

Ah wait, trying I just remember that whatever you put after ofbiz which has no sense you get the help. That's enough for me, subject close

Jacques


Le 30/03/2017 à 14:40, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

> I think this is similar to another question you have asked in a Jira
> ticket, for which you already got some feedback. Please correct me if I am
> wrong
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Le 25/03/2017 à 11:59, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We don't have a documentation quickly accessible for "gradlew 'ofbiz
>>> -help'" (aka"java -jar build\libs\ofbiz.jar -h") when using "gradlew ta"
>>>
>>> It's missing when you want to know the syntax for running test cases and
>>> test suites without having to look into the README.md file (and remember
>>> it's there)
>>>
>>> Could we not adding it, as an example, to <<Pattern: ofbiz <Commands>:
>>> Execute OFBiz startup commands ?>>
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>> This message is 5 days old now, so I think I can take that as a
>> consensus. Or should I wait next week, or?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>