Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Jacopo Cappellato-4
What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.

Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):

        • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
        • 20111205EmailHandling/
        • 20120209RemoveBsh/
        • 20120329_portletWidget/
        • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
        • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
        • addbirt/
        • executioncontext20090716/
        • executioncontext20090812/
        • executioncontext20091231/
        • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
        • htmlfive_20110529/
        • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
        • jackrabbit20100709/
        • jackrabbit20120501/
        • jquery/
        • multitenant20100310/
        • webhelp-2012-12-07/

Regards,

Jacopo


(*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

taher
Hi Jacopo,

I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be
useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking
into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was
already done on it.

Taher Alkhateeb

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental
> branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
>
> Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
>
>         • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
>         • 20111205EmailHandling/
>         • 20120209RemoveBsh/
>         • 20120329_portletWidget/
>         • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
>         • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
>         • addbirt/
>         • executioncontext20090716/
>         • executioncontext20090812/
>         • executioncontext20091231/
>         • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
>         • htmlfive_20110529/
>         • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
>         • jackrabbit20100709/
>         • jackrabbit20120501/
>         • jquery/
>         • multitenant20100310/
>         • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>
> Regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Pierre Smits
Re: jacrabbit branches

A lot of work was put in there, and functionality was fairly complete when
Sascha couldn't find the time anymore to work on this.

Re: OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23
This is still ongoing.



Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Taher Alkhateeb <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> Hi Jacopo,
>
> I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be
> useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking
> into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was
> already done on it.
>
> Taher Alkhateeb
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental
> > branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
> >
> > Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
> >
> >         • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
> >         • 20111205EmailHandling/
> >         • 20120209RemoveBsh/
> >         • 20120329_portletWidget/
> >         • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
> >         • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
> >         • addbirt/
> >         • executioncontext20090716/
> >         • executioncontext20090812/
> >         • executioncontext20091231/
> >         • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
> >         • htmlfive_20110529/
> >         • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
> >         • jackrabbit20100709/
> >         • jackrabbit20120501/
> >         • jquery/
> >         • multitenant20100310/
> >         • webhelp-2012-12-07/
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
> >
> > (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Adrian Crum-3
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
executioncontext20091231

is a working copy of the security redesign:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign

I still hope there will be some interest in it some day.

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
>
> Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
>
> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
> • 20111205EmailHandling/
> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
> • 20120329_portletWidget/
> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
> • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
> • addbirt/
> • executioncontext20090716/
> • executioncontext20090812/
> • executioncontext20091231/
> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
> • htmlfive_20110529/
> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
> • jackrabbit20100709/
> • jackrabbit20120501/
> • jquery/
> • multitenant20100310/
> • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>
> Regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Jacopo Cappellato-4
In reply to this post by Pierre Smits
Ok, here is the list of candidates for removal updated (I have removed the 2 branches mentioned by Taher and Pierre):

        • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
        • 20111205EmailHandling/
        • 20120209RemoveBsh/
        • 20120329_portletWidget/
        • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
        • addbirt/
        • executioncontext20090716/
        • executioncontext20090812/
        • executioncontext20091231/
        • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
        • htmlfive_20110529/
        • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
        • jackrabbit20100709/
        • jquery/
        • multitenant20100310/
        • webhelp-2012-12-07/

Jacopo


On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Re: jacrabbit branches
>
> A lot of work was put in there, and functionality was fairly complete when
> Sascha couldn't find the time anymore to work on this.
>
> Re: OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23
> This is still ongoing.
>
>
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Taher Alkhateeb <[hidden email]
>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jacopo,
>>
>> I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be
>> useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking
>> into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was
>> already done on it.
>>
>> Taher Alkhateeb
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental
>>> branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
>>>
>>> Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
>>>
>>>        • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
>>>        • 20111205EmailHandling/
>>>        • 20120209RemoveBsh/
>>>        • 20120329_portletWidget/
>>>        • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
>>>        • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
>>>        • addbirt/
>>>        • executioncontext20090716/
>>>        • executioncontext20090812/
>>>        • executioncontext20091231/
>>>        • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
>>>        • htmlfive_20110529/
>>>        • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
>>>        • jackrabbit20100709/
>>>        • jackrabbit20120501/
>>>        • jquery/
>>>        • multitenant20100310/
>>>        • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>> (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Jacopo Cappellato-4
In reply to this post by Adrian Crum-3
New list after Adrian's feedback:

        • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
        • 20111205EmailHandling/
        • 20120209RemoveBsh/
        • 20120329_portletWidget/
        • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
        • addbirt/
        • executioncontext20090716/
        • executioncontext20090812/
        • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
        • htmlfive_20110529/
        • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
        • jackrabbit20100709/
        • jquery/
        • multitenant20100310/
        • webhelp-2012-12-07/

Jacopo

On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> wrote:

> executioncontext20091231
>
> is a working copy of the security redesign:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign
>
> I still hope there will be some interest in it some day.
>
> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
>
> On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
>>
>> Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
>>
>> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
>> • 20111205EmailHandling/
>> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
>> • 20120329_portletWidget/
>> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
>> • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
>> • addbirt/
>> • executioncontext20090716/
>> • executioncontext20090812/
>> • executioncontext20091231/
>> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
>> • htmlfive_20110529/
>> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
>> • jackrabbit20100709/
>> • jackrabbit20120501/
>> • jquery/
>> • multitenant20100310/
>> • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>> (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Deepak Dixit-2
We can remove jquery branch for sure, as we merged moved to jquery library completely.


Thanks & Regards

Deepak Dixit

On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote:

> New list after Adrian's feedback:
>
> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
> • 20111205EmailHandling/
> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
> • 20120329_portletWidget/
> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
> • addbirt/
> • executioncontext20090716/
> • executioncontext20090812/
> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
> • htmlfive_20110529/
> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
> • jackrabbit20100709/
> • jquery/
> • multitenant20100310/
> • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> executioncontext20091231
>>
>> is a working copy of the security redesign:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign
>>
>> I still hope there will be some interest in it some day.
>>
>> Adrian Crum
>> Sandglass Software
>> www.sandglass-software.com
>>
>> On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
>>>
>>> Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
>>>
>>> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
>>> • 20111205EmailHandling/
>>> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
>>> • 20120329_portletWidget/
>>> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
>>> • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
>>> • addbirt/
>>> • executioncontext20090716/
>>> • executioncontext20090812/
>>> • executioncontext20091231/
>>> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
>>> • htmlfive_20110529/
>>> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
>>> • jackrabbit20100709/
>>> • jackrabbit20120501/
>>> • jquery/
>>> • multitenant20100310/
>>> • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>> (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
>>>
>


smime.p7s (6K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
I update OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ every week, and plan to merge it when I will get enough continuous time.
Also I'd like to keep webhelp-2012-12-07 as long as a Neogia (now rather ofbiz.fr) addon will not be officially released
I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO.
I don't know if 2013_RemoveJavolution is still a WIP?
I'm sure jquery can be dropped
For the rest I have no clear ideas.

Jacques

Le 30/09/2014 09:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

> What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
>
> Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
>
> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
> • 20111205EmailHandling/
> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
> • 20120329_portletWidget/
> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
> • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
> • addbirt/
> • executioncontext20090716/
> • executioncontext20090812/
> • executioncontext20091231/
> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
> • htmlfive_20110529/
> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
> • jackrabbit20100709/
> • jackrabbit20120501/
> • jquery/
> • multitenant20100310/
> • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>
> Regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Nicolas Malin-2
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
Inline
Le 30/09/2014 10:01, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
> • 20111205EmailHandling/
Initialized by me, but the gap is really important with the trunk, I
prefer restart from scratch
> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
> • 20120329_portletWidget/
I just ask before.
> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
> • addbirt/
> • executioncontext20090716/
> • executioncontext20090812/
> • executioncontext20091231/
> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
> • htmlfive_20110529/
I just check what contains exactly before delete it, I will interesting
by continue HMTL5 implantation
> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
> • jackrabbit20100709/
> • jquery/
> • multitenant20100310/
> • webhelp-2012-12-07/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Jacopo Cappellato-4
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux

On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I update OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ every week, and plan to merge it when I will get enough continuous time.

Got it.

> Also I'd like to keep webhelp-2012-12-07 as long as a Neogia (now rather ofbiz.fr) addon will not be officially released

Got it.

> I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO.

I have already removed from the list the newest jackrabbit branch (there are 3): the two ones you see in this list are two older copies.

> I don't know if 2013_RemoveJavolution is still a WIP?
> I'm sure jquery can be dropped
> For the rest I have no clear ideas.
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 30/09/2014 09:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>> What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
>>
>> Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
>>
>> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
>> • 20111205EmailHandling/
>> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
>> • 20120329_portletWidget/
>> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
>> • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
>> • addbirt/
>> • executioncontext20090716/
>> • executioncontext20090812/
>> • executioncontext20091231/
>> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
>> • htmlfive_20110529/
>> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
>> • jackrabbit20100709/
>> • jackrabbit20120501/
>> • jquery/
>> • multitenant20100310/
>> • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>> (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Jacopo Cappellato-4
In reply to this post by Nicolas Malin-2
Hi Nicolas,

On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Nicolas Malin <[hidden email]> wrote:

>> • 20120329_portletWidget/
> I just ask before.

do you mean that we should keep it?

Jacopo

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Jacopo Cappellato-4
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4

On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote:

>> I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO.
>
> I have already removed from the list the newest jackrabbit branch (there are 3): the two ones you see in this list are two older copies.

I was wrong (got confused with the executionframework): there are 2 jackrabbit instances.

Jacopo

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Nicolas Malin-2
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
Hi jacopo
>>> • 20120329_portletWidget/
>> I just ask before.
> do you mean that we should keep it?
Or delete it, I will ask to people has been worked on it before :)
>
> Jacopo
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

Olivier.heintz
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
  20120329_portletWidget and  webhelp-2012-12-07 have been migrated as addon on ofbizextra so you can remove its.
They are available for trunk and 13.07.

Olivier



Le 30/09/2014 10:02, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

> New list after Adrian's feedback:
>
> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
> • 20111205EmailHandling/
> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
> • 20120329_portletWidget/
> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
> • addbirt/
> • executioncontext20090716/
> • executioncontext20090812/
> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
> • htmlfive_20110529/
> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
> • jackrabbit20100709/
> • jquery/
> • multitenant20100310/
> • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> executioncontext20091231
>>
>> is a working copy of the security redesign:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign
>>
>> I still hope there will be some interest in it some day.
>>
>> Adrian Crum
>> Sandglass Software
>> www.sandglass-software.com
>>
>> On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
>>>
>>> Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
>>>
>>> • 20111115ScreenWidgetRedesign/
>>> • 20111205EmailHandling/
>>> • 20120209RemoveBsh/
>>> • 20120329_portletWidget/
>>> • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
>>> • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
>>> • addbirt/
>>> • executioncontext20090716/
>>> • executioncontext20090812/
>>> • executioncontext20091231/
>>> • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
>>> • htmlfive_20110529/
>>> • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
>>> • jackrabbit20100709/
>>> • jackrabbit20120501/
>>> • jquery/
>>> • multitenant20100310/
>>> • webhelp-2012-12-07/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>> (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
>>>
>