InventoryTransfer, tracing split back to original Item?

[James McGill-5]

After transfering an InventoryItem within the same facility, I'm unable to
either trace back to the original InventoryItemId from the newly created Id.

prepareInventoryTransfer doesn't appear to have access to the
InventoryTransfer Id, but completeInventoryTransfer doesn't have the new
item that
was created in prepareInventoryTransfer.

I wonder if there is something I can do in the
 <eca service="createInventoryTransfer" event="invoke">
        <condition field-name="statusId" operator="not-equals"
value="IXF_CANCELLED"/>
        <action service="prepareInventoryTransfer" mode="sync"/>
    </eca>


--
James McGill
Phoenix AZ

[Matt Warnock]

Has there been, or will there be a 10.04 release branch?  I haven't seen
anything about it in some weeks, though I thought things were headed in
that direction.  

I'm now running Ubuntu 10.04 on my laptop.  Just curious...
--
Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

[Chirag Manocha-3]

Release 10.04 is already out.

You can have it from svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04

Regards
--
Chirag Manocha
Emforium Pvt. Ltd.
Contact :- [phone], [phone]


----- "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:10:35 AM
> Subject: Any news on release 10.04?
>
> Has there been, or will there be a 10.04 release branch?  I haven't
> seen
> anything about it in some weeks, though I thought things were headed
> in
> that direction.  
>
> I'm now running Ubuntu 10.04 on my laptop.  Just curious...
> --
> Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

[BJ Freeman]

it was voted on last week of april and created on may 1st
if is in the branch part of the svn.
currently it is considered a RC1
subscribe to the dev ML to get such info.


=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>


Matt Warnock sent the following on 5/4/2010 10:40 PM:
> Has there been, or will there be a 10.04 release branch?  I haven't seen
> anything about it in some weeks, though I thought things were headed in
> that direction.  
>
> I'm now running Ubuntu 10.04 on my laptop.  Just curious...

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

Well it is not a release.
It is just an svn branch for now.
Soon we will vote to release 10.04.RC1 as the first official release from this branch.

Jacopo

On May 5, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Chirag Manocha wrote:

> Release 10.04 is already out.
>
> You can have it from svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04
>
> Regards
> --
> Chirag Manocha
> Emforium Pvt. Ltd.
> Contact :- [phone], [phone]
>
>
> ----- "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> From: "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]>
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:10:35 AM
>> Subject: Any news on release 10.04?
>>
>> Has there been, or will there be a 10.04 release branch?  I haven't
>> seen
>> anything about it in some weeks, though I thought things were headed
>> in
>> that direction.  
>>
>> I'm now running Ubuntu 10.04 on my laptop.  Just curious...
>> --
>> Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
>> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

[Matt Warnock]

Thanks! Guess I missed the announcement.  Someone ought perhaps to
update the download link on the website as well.

Looking forward to checking it out!
--
Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 03:15 -0400, Chirag Manocha wrote:

> Release 10.04 is already out.
>
> You can have it from svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04
>
> Regards
> --
> Chirag Manocha
> Emforium Pvt. Ltd.
> Contact :- [phone], [phone]
>
>
> ----- "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > From: "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]>
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:10:35 AM
> > Subject: Any news on release 10.04?
> >
> > Has there been, or will there be a 10.04 release branch?  I haven't
> > seen
> > anything about it in some weeks, though I thought things were headed
> > in
> > that direction.  
> >
> > I'm now running Ubuntu 10.04 on my laptop.  Just curious...
> > --
> > Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
> > RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

[Matt Warnock]

Thanks, BJ.
--
Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 02:23 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:

> it was voted on last week of april and created on may 1st
> if is in the branch part of the svn.
> currently it is considered a RC1
> subscribe to the dev ML to get such info.
>
>
> =========================
> BJ Freeman
> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>
> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
> Linkedin
> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>
>
> Matt Warnock sent the following on 5/4/2010 10:40 PM:
> > Has there been, or will there be a 10.04 release branch?  I haven't seen
> > anything about it in some weeks, though I thought things were headed in
> > that direction.  
> >
> > I'm now running Ubuntu 10.04 on my laptop.  Just curious...
>

[Anil Patel-3]

Matt,
As Jacopo mentioned, we created a release branch in svn. But no release yet. Sometime soon 10.04RC1 distribution will be created, at that point download page will have a link to download zip file.

Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"

On May 5, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Matt Warnock wrote:

> Thanks! Guess I missed the announcement.  Someone ought perhaps to
> update the download link on the website as well.
>
> Looking forward to checking it out!
> --
> Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.
>
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 03:15 -0400, Chirag Manocha wrote:
>> Release 10.04 is already out.
>>
>> You can have it from svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Chirag Manocha
>> Emforium Pvt. Ltd.
>> Contact :- [phone], [phone]
>>
>>
>> ----- "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]>
>>> To: [hidden email]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:10:35 AM
>>> Subject: Any news on release 10.04?
>>>
>>> Has there been, or will there be a 10.04 release branch?  I haven't
>>> seen
>>> anything about it in some weeks, though I thought things were headed
>>> in
>>> that direction.  
>>>
>>> I'm now running Ubuntu 10.04 on my laptop.  Just curious...
>>> --
>>> Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
>>> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.
>

[Matt Warnock]

Thanks for the clarification.
--
Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 11:59 +0200, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> Well it is not a release.
> It is just an svn branch for now.
> Soon we will vote to release 10.04.RC1 as the first official release from this branch.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On May 5, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Chirag Manocha wrote:
>
> > Release 10.04 is already out.
> >
> > You can have it from svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Chirag Manocha
> > Emforium Pvt. Ltd.
> > Contact :- [phone], [phone]
> >
> >
> > ----- "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> From: "Matt Warnock" <[hidden email]>
> >> To: [hidden email]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:10:35 AM
> >> Subject: Any news on release 10.04?
> >>
> >> Has there been, or will there be a 10.04 release branch?  I haven't
> >> seen
> >> anything about it in some weeks, though I thought things were headed
> >> in
> >> that direction.  
> >>
> >> I'm now running Ubuntu 10.04 on my laptop.  Just curious...
> >> --
> >> Matt Warnock <[hidden email]>
> >> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

[James McGill-5]

I accidentally sent my message before I finished writing.

My basic issue:

> After transfering an InventoryItem within the same facility, I'm unable to
> either trace back to the original InventoryItemId from the newly created Id.
>
>
The reason it is a problem:

In the "invoke" Service ECA for "createInventoryTransfer",
"prepareInventoryTransfer" is called.  In that function, the destination
inventory item is created,
and the source inventory item ID is discarded.  I need to introduce a way to
trace this.  What I'd like to do is to add a detail record to the source
InventoryItem
so that the transfer can be found there as well as in the child
InventoryItem.

I want to add something to the context in prepareInventoryTransfer (e.g., a
"sourceInventoryItemId" parameter) and then have that context parameter be
submitted
to "completeInventoryTransfer".

What I don't know how to do, is to add a parameter to an "invoke" ECA and
have that parameter be available in the "commit" ECA.

So in applications/product//servicedef/secas.xml we have this:

    <!-- inventory transfer -->
    <eca service="createInventoryTransfer" event="invoke">
        <condition field-name="statusId" operator="not-equals"
value="IXF_CANCELLED"/>
        <action service="prepareInventoryTransfer" mode="sync"/>
    </eca>
    <eca service="createInventoryTransfer" event="commit">
        <condition field-name="statusId" operator="equals"
value="IXF_COMPLETE"/>
        <action service="completeInventoryTransfer" mode="sync"/>
        <action service="balanceInventoryItems" mode="sync"/>
    </eca>

If I add an OUT parameter to prepareInventoryTransfer, that's not enough to
bring that parameter to the input context of completeInventoryTransfer, so
I'm stuck.

--
James McGill
Phoenix AZ

[R. S.]

Hi,
during the creation of Party Group, I noticed that the field "Party ID"
is missing. So I looked at the event createpartygroup, if the field
"Party ID" is missing then one automatically assigned. But I wanted my
own award. So I commented out the fields (see below) and the field was
there.
My question is, what is checked in these lines, which I commented out?
Thank you.

Regards
Rudolf

<form name="EditPartyGroup" type="single" target="updatePartyGroup"
default-map-name="partyGroup"
        focus-field-name="groupName" header-row-style="header-row"
default-table-style="basic-table">
        <alt-target use-when="partyGroup==null" target="createPartyGroup"/>
        <auto-fields-service service-name="updatePartyGroup"/>

####   This are commented out lines.  ##################

       *<!-- <field use-when="partyGroup!=null" name="partyId"
title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"
tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonNotModifRecreat}"><display/></field>
        <field use-when="partyGroup==null&amp;&amp;partyId==null"
name="partyId" title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"><ignored/></field>
        <field use-when="partyGroup==null&amp;&amp;partyId!=null"
name="partyId" title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"
tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonCannotBeFound}: [${partyId}]"><display
also-hidden="false"/></field>-->*/*
*/
        <field name="groupName" tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonRequired}"
widget-style="required"></field>
        <field name="partyTypeId"><ignored/></field>
        <field name="description"
title="${uiLabelMap.CommonDescription}"><text/></field>
        <field name="preferredCurrencyUomId">
            <drop-down allow-empty="true">
                <entity-options key-field-name="uomId"
description="${abbreviation} - ${description}" entity-name="Uom">
                    <entity-constraint name="uomTypeId"
operator="equals" value="CURRENCY_MEASURE"/>
                    <entity-order-by field-name="abbreviation"/>
                </entity-options>
            </drop-down>

[Eric DE MAULDE]

To create a party with a manual party ID
See in ./applications/party/data/PartyDemoData.xml

-----Original Message-----
From: R. S. <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Create PartyGroup
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 10:11:44 +0200
Mailer: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)


Hi,
during the creation of Party Group, I noticed that the field "Party ID"
is missing. So I looked at the event createpartygroup, if the field
"Party ID" is missing then one automatically assigned. But I wanted my
own award. So I commented out the fields (see below) and the field was
there.
My question is, what is checked in these lines, which I commented out?
Thank you.

Regards
Rudolf

<form name="EditPartyGroup" type="single" target="updatePartyGroup"
default-map-name="partyGroup"
        focus-field-name="groupName" header-row-style="header-row"
default-table-style="basic-table">
        <alt-target use-when="partyGroup==null" target="createPartyGroup"/>
        <auto-fields-service service-name="updatePartyGroup"/>

####   This are commented out lines.  ##################

       *<!-- <field use-when="partyGroup!=null" name="partyId"
title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"
tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonNotModifRecreat}"><display/></field>
        <field use-when="partyGroup==null&amp;&amp;partyId==null"
name="partyId" title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"><ignored/></field>
        <field use-when="partyGroup==null&amp;&amp;partyId!=null"
name="partyId" title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"
tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonCannotBeFound}: [${partyId}]"><display
also-hidden="false"/></field>-->*/*
*/
        <field name="groupName" tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonRequired}"
widget-style="required"></field>
        <field name="partyTypeId"><ignored/></field>
        <field name="description"
title="${uiLabelMap.CommonDescription}"><text/></field>
        <field name="preferredCurrencyUomId">
            <drop-down allow-empty="true">
                <entity-options key-field-name="uomId"
description="${abbreviation} - ${description}" entity-name="Uom">
                    <entity-constraint name="uomTypeId"
operator="equals" value="CURRENCY_MEASURE"/>
                    <entity-order-by field-name="abbreviation"/>
                </entity-options>
            </drop-down>

[R. S.]

Thank you eric.
I have anothere question. I'm already on despair.
I don't know where to get individual fields for CreatePartyGroup.
Because when I want create a partygroup only the necessary fields should
be visible.I don't want to show all the fields. How can I realized that.
I am grateful for any help.

Regards
Rudolf

eric schrieb:

> To create a party with a manual party ID
> See in ./applications/party/data/PartyDemoData.xml
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R. S. <[hidden email]>
> Reply-To: [hidden email]
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Create PartyGroup
> Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 10:11:44 +0200
> Mailer: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
>
>
> Hi,
> during the creation of Party Group, I noticed that the field "Party ID"
> is missing. So I looked at the event createpartygroup, if the field
> "Party ID" is missing then one automatically assigned. But I wanted my
> own award. So I commented out the fields (see below) and the field was
> there.
> My question is, what is checked in these lines, which I commented out?
> Thank you.
>
> Regards
> Rudolf
>
> <form name="EditPartyGroup" type="single" target="updatePartyGroup"
> default-map-name="partyGroup"
>         focus-field-name="groupName" header-row-style="header-row"
> default-table-style="basic-table">
>         <alt-target use-when="partyGroup==null" target="createPartyGroup"/>
>         <auto-fields-service service-name="updatePartyGroup"/>
>
> ####   This are commented out lines.  ##################
>
>        *<!-- <field use-when="partyGroup!=null" name="partyId"
> title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"
> tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonNotModifRecreat}"><display/></field>
>         <field use-when="partyGroup==null&amp;&amp;partyId==null"
> name="partyId" title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"><ignored/></field>
>         <field use-when="partyGroup==null&amp;&amp;partyId!=null"
> name="partyId" title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"
> tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonCannotBeFound}: [${partyId}]"><display
> also-hidden="false"/></field>-->*/*
> */
>         <field name="groupName" tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonRequired}"
> widget-style="required"></field>
>         <field name="partyTypeId"><ignored/></field>
>         <field name="description"
> title="${uiLabelMap.CommonDescription}"><text/></field>
>         <field name="preferredCurrencyUomId">
>             <drop-down allow-empty="true">
>                 <entity-options key-field-name="uomId"
> description="${abbreviation} - ${description}" entity-name="Uom">
>                     <entity-constraint name="uomTypeId"
> operator="equals" value="CURRENCY_MEASURE"/>
>                     <entity-order-by field-name="abbreviation"/>
>                 </entity-options>
>             </drop-down>
>
>  

[Atul Vani]

you can try creating a webapp with the same name (in this case 'partymgr') and then overload forms and screens as per your customization requirements.

Thanks & Regards
Atul Vani

----- Original Message -----
From: "R. S." <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2010 4:10:04 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi
Subject: Re: Create PartyGroup

Thank you eric.
I have anothere question. I'm already on despair.
I don't know where to get individual fields for CreatePartyGroup.
Because when I want create a partygroup only the necessary fields should
be visible.I don't want to show all the fields. How can I realized that.
I am grateful for any help.

Regards
Rudolf

eric schrieb:

> To create a party with a manual party ID
> See in ./applications/party/data/PartyDemoData.xml
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R. S. <[hidden email]>
> Reply-To: [hidden email]
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Create PartyGroup
> Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 10:11:44 +0200
> Mailer: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
>
>
> Hi,
> during the creation of Party Group, I noticed that the field "Party ID"
> is missing. So I looked at the event createpartygroup, if the field
> "Party ID" is missing then one automatically assigned. But I wanted my
> own award. So I commented out the fields (see below) and the field was
> there.
> My question is, what is checked in these lines, which I commented out?
> Thank you.
>
> Regards
> Rudolf
>
> <form name="EditPartyGroup" type="single" target="updatePartyGroup"
> default-map-name="partyGroup"
>         focus-field-name="groupName" header-row-style="header-row"
> default-table-style="basic-table">
>         <alt-target use-when="partyGroup==null" target="createPartyGroup"/>
>         <auto-fields-service service-name="updatePartyGroup"/>
>
> ####   This are commented out lines.  ##################
>
>        *<!-- <field use-when="partyGroup!=null" name="partyId"
> title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"
> tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonNotModifRecreat}"><display/></field>
>         <field use-when="partyGroup==null&amp;&amp;partyId==null"
> name="partyId" title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"><ignored/></field>
>         <field use-when="partyGroup==null&amp;&amp;partyId!=null"
> name="partyId" title="${uiLabelMap.PartyPartyId}"
> tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonCannotBeFound}: [${partyId}]"><display
> also-hidden="false"/></field>-->*/*
> */
>         <field name="groupName" tooltip="${uiLabelMap.CommonRequired}"
> widget-style="required"></field>
>         <field name="partyTypeId"><ignored/></field>
>         <field name="description"
> title="${uiLabelMap.CommonDescription}"><text/></field>
>         <field name="preferredCurrencyUomId">
>             <drop-down allow-empty="true">
>                 <entity-options key-field-name="uomId"
> description="${abbreviation} - ${description}" entity-name="Uom">
>                     <entity-constraint name="uomTypeId"
> operator="equals" value="CURRENCY_MEASURE"/>
>                     <entity-order-by field-name="abbreviation"/>
>                 </entity-options>
>             </drop-down>
>
>  

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi,

Did you solve your issue?

Jacques

From: "James McGill" <[hidden email]>

>I accidentally sent my message before I finished writing.
>
> My basic issue:
>
>> After transfering an InventoryItem within the same facility, I'm unable to
>> either trace back to the original InventoryItemId from the newly created Id.
>>
>>
> The reason it is a problem:
>
> In the "invoke" Service ECA for "createInventoryTransfer",
> "prepareInventoryTransfer" is called.  In that function, the destination
> inventory item is created,
> and the source inventory item ID is discarded.  I need to introduce a way to
> trace this.  What I'd like to do is to add a detail record to the source
> InventoryItem
> so that the transfer can be found there as well as in the child
> InventoryItem.
>
> I want to add something to the context in prepareInventoryTransfer (e.g., a
> "sourceInventoryItemId" parameter) and then have that context parameter be
> submitted
> to "completeInventoryTransfer".
>
> What I don't know how to do, is to add a parameter to an "invoke" ECA and
> have that parameter be available in the "commit" ECA.
>
> So in applications/product//servicedef/secas.xml we have this:
>
>    <!-- inventory transfer -->
>    <eca service="createInventoryTransfer" event="invoke">
>        <condition field-name="statusId" operator="not-equals"
> value="IXF_CANCELLED"/>
>        <action service="prepareInventoryTransfer" mode="sync"/>
>    </eca>
>    <eca service="createInventoryTransfer" event="commit">
>        <condition field-name="statusId" operator="equals"
> value="IXF_COMPLETE"/>
>        <action service="completeInventoryTransfer" mode="sync"/>
>        <action service="balanceInventoryItems" mode="sync"/>
>    </eca>
>
> If I add an OUT parameter to prepareInventoryTransfer, that's not enough to
> bring that parameter to the input context of completeInventoryTransfer, so
> I'm stuck.
>
> --
> James McGill
> Phoenix AZ
>

[James McGill-5]

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Did you solve your issue?
>
> Jacques
>

I did, by writing an extra detail record, and by adding a field to
InventoryItemDetail.

Thanks.

[Jacques Le Roux]

Would you mind contribute it?

Jacques

From: "James McGill" <[hidden email]>

> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Did you solve your issue?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>
> I did, by writing an extra detail record, and by adding a field to
> InventoryItemDetail.
>
> Thanks.
>