[ http://jira.undersunconsulting.com/browse/OFBIZ-163?page=all ]
David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-163: -------------------------------- Assign To: David E. Jones (was: Jira Administrator) Resolution: Incomplete A good concept, but needs more research and analysis. Will wait for it to re-emerge, hopefully along with enough interest to mobilize resources to move it along. > Usability improvment relevant for WIDGETs > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-163 > URL: http://jira.undersunconsulting.com/browse/OFBIZ-163 > Project: [OFBiz] Open For Business > Type: Improvement > Components: widget > Versions: SVN > Reporter: Michael Pfurtscheller > Assignee: David E. Jones > > > Enhancement of the formwidget. For storing form "value-templates" and such as described in the thread on the mailinglist: > http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/htdig/dev/2005-February/thread.html#7741 > Extract from the thread: > Michael, > This sounds like it would be a very nice tool, and it should be quite > possible to implement, including a data model that could generically > store template field values. > This would require less effort than what has been discussed about the > help system, but it is still a fair amount of effort. It's great to > send ideas to the mailing lists and I'm sure everyone appreciates it > since there is a chance that someone will need something like these in > the future and will have the resources available to get it done. Before > that I wouldn't expect much... There are dozens or hundreds of ideas > about what to do with the project every month and probably 90% of them > don't get implemented or are not implemented until perhaps months or > years later. It's really a resource issue, for everyone... > -David > On Feb 6, 2005, at 12:33 PM, mpf at zentric.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i would like to discuss a proposal to make life of ofbiz component > > managers and users easier. It came up in my mind when thinking about > > the online help proposal and adrians approach to templates /models in > > the accounting engine. > > > > Current Situation: > > When you open a form (any form in ) it is empty or contains static > > defaults (from a users point of view). Often its the case that you > > want to enter 4 products in a row that are almost similar except > > productid and one or two fields. But you have to reenter every field > > (they are allways to much) which is a sucking task!Or you only have > > products of 3 types that you would like your form-field to be > > prefilled with. Ofbiz and systems I know need to implement types and > > templates for each form individually. > > > > Proposal > > > > With the widgets there is the possibility to have a central piece of > > code to maintain generic value templates. A central pirece of code to > > store, find, delete generic values templates. We would need 1 entity > > genericValueTemplates with templateId and a blob to store the > > xml-representation of the generic-value (similar to persisting the > > attributes of scheduled jobs in ofbiz). > > > > So every form gets an attribute wether or not to display the > > following function-links > > - store as template, > > - find template > > > > If one klicks "find template" in the form widget he'll get a new > > window (something like a calander selector) . There he'll be able to > > select from a list of templates that are associated with the entity > > that is represented by the form. He selects the appropiate template > > and the form-widgets fields get prefilled with default values that > > where stored in the xml. > > > > This approach could be extended for some more features that seem not > > to hard to implement, to me and are quit unconventional but proven > > good in other applications. > > - Add a checkbox to the save action to say "I want to reopen this > > form after storing with the values I had just entered as default > > Instead of returning to a base point. > > - Add a action url to each "type" field to create maintain that type. > > This way a user never has to search for the place: Where to create a > > new productType or partyType or whatever. It seems to be simple but > > the impact for the user is incredible since he doesnt need anymore how > > to get to specific form screens. For the developer this saves a lot of > > documentation time! > > > > Im no code guru! So I have just the feeling that it would be possible > > without to much twisting the system! And it would fit good into the > > architecture of the widgets.???? > > Please correct me if Im totally on the wrong track. If this could be > > talked through and aggred upon I'll summarize it in the wiki.... > > > > > > However I desperatly would like to see the online helpystem come true > > as soon as possible.... > > > > mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen/ Kind regards / muchos saludos > > -- > > Dipl. Wirt.-Ing. Michael Pfurtscheller > > zentric GmbH & Co. KG > > mobil: +49-172-5457143 > > fon: +49-6101-556060 > > fax: +49-6101-556065 > > icq# 8724822 > > mailto:michael.pfurtscheller at zentric.com > > http://www.zentric.com > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.undersunconsulting.com/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |