should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man |
and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote: > should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk > http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation > <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > |
The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some
internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not backwards. but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk the question comes who will maintain these. right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. but then you have to go through the code and replace all the references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate release chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: > and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> wrote: >> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> >> > |
Administrator
|
Here is a pragmatic answer from David http://markmail.org/message/lbxf4jxallv7yngq
And here another interesting (older) one which will please Chris http://markmail.org/message/dbit6lgsprx2eywu Also for Eclipse https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-UsinglocaleXSDfilesinsteadofOFBizremote(at Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not > backwards. > but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version > http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 > http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 > http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 > http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk > > the question comes who will maintain these. > right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. > scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. > but then you have to go through the code and replace all the references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate > release > > > chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: >> and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ >> >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> wrote: >>> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >>> >>> ========================= >>> BJ Freeman >>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>> >>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>> >>> >> > |
BTW, about that email from me: I don't think that is the best solution for the project in general. It is a good option for individual developers and users, and maybe the best option unless the project takes a different approach. For example, it would be great to have separate URLs for different versions. If we went through real design then develop phases then we could even put the version numbers in filenames or something to make it REALLY clear, but that isn't how OFBiz is (or has been) run. We could certainly go back and grab the XSDs from release branches and do something like what is proposed below on the ofbiz web site, and then search/replace all of the XSD URLs in XML files to point to the proper place for each branch. It would be a good improvement. -David On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Here is a pragmatic answer from David http://markmail.org/message/lbxf4jxallv7yngq > And here another interesting (older) one which will please Chris > http://markmail.org/message/dbit6lgsprx2eywu > > Also for Eclipse > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-UsinglocaleXSDfilesinsteadofOFBizremote(at > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >> The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not backwards. >> but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk >> >> the question comes who will maintain these. >> right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. >> scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. >> but then you have to go through the code and replace all the references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate release >> >> >> chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: >>> and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >>>> >>>> ========================= >>>> BJ Freeman >>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>> >>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>> >>>> >>> > > |
Administrator
|
From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
> BTW, about that email from me: I don't think that is the best solution for the project in general. It is a good option for > individual developers and users, and maybe the best option unless the project takes a different approach. Yes, I agree it's 2 different things. I have asked recently to have separated XSDs online. I did not thought about JavaDocs. The online Help would be good also... > For example, it would be great to have separate URLs for different versions. If we went through real design then develop phases > then we could even put the version numbers in filenames or something to make it REALLY clear, but that isn't how OFBiz is (or has > been) run. We could certainly go back and grab the XSDs from release branches and do something like what is proposed below on the > ofbiz web site, and then search/replace all of the XSD URLs in XML files to point to the proper place for each branch. It would be > a good improvement. Yes, BJ's proposition sounds like the easier for now. The script handles both dtd and javadoc. The problem, as ever, is... to do it ;o) Jacques > -David > > > On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Here is a pragmatic answer from David http://markmail.org/message/lbxf4jxallv7yngq >> And here another interesting (older) one which will please Chris >> http://markmail.org/message/dbit6lgsprx2eywu >> >> Also for Eclipse >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-UsinglocaleXSDfilesinsteadofOFBizremote(at >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>> The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not >>> backwards. >>> but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version >>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 >>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 >>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 >>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk >>> >>> the question comes who will maintain these. >>> right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. >>> scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. >>> but then you have to go through the code and replace all the references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate >>> release >>> >>> >>> chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: >>>> and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >>>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >>>>> >>>>> ========================= >>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>> >>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> > |
Ok you twisted my arm. will make a jira as soon as I have the files to put in. >>Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/18/2010 2:18 PM: > From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> >> BTW, about that email from me: I don't think that is the best solution >> for the project in general. It is a good option for individual >> developers and users, and maybe the best option unless the project >> takes a different approach. > > Yes, I agree it's 2 different things. I have asked recently to have > separated XSDs online. I did not thought about JavaDocs. The online Help > would be good also... > >> For example, it would be great to have separate URLs for different >> versions. If we went through real design then develop phases then we >> could even put the version numbers in filenames or something to make >> it REALLY clear, but that isn't how OFBiz is (or has been) run. We >> could certainly go back and grab the XSDs from release branches and do >> something like what is proposed below on the ofbiz web site, and then >> search/replace all of the XSD URLs in XML files to point to the proper >> place for each branch. It would be a good improvement. > > Yes, BJ's proposition sounds like the easier for now. The script handles > both dtd and javadoc. The problem, as ever, is... to do it ;o) > > Jacques > >> -David >> >> >> On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> Here is a pragmatic answer from David >>> http://markmail.org/message/lbxf4jxallv7yngq >>> And here another interesting (older) one which will please Chris >>> http://markmail.org/message/dbit6lgsprx2eywu >>> >>> Also for Eclipse >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-UsinglocaleXSDfilesinsteadofOFBizremote(at >>> >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>>> The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some >>>> internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not >>>> backwards. >>>> but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version >>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 >>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 >>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 >>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk >>>> >>>> the question comes who will maintain these. >>>> right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. >>>> scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. >>>> but then you have to go through the code and replace all the >>>> references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate release >>>> >>>> >>>> chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: >>>>> and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >>>>>> >>>>>> ========================= >>>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>>>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>>> >>>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > > > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> >> BTW, about that email from me: I don't think that is the best solution for the project in general. It is a good option for >> individual developers and users, and maybe the best option unless the project takes a different approach. > > Yes, I agree it's 2 different things. I have asked recently to have separated XSDs online. I did not thought about JavaDocs. The > online Help would be good also... Found it, the last time was http://markmail.org/message/gi772634n2ewbujb :/ Good side, I cleaned 100 old messages, and BJ's ideas sounds good, patches anybody? :) >> For example, it would be great to have separate URLs for different versions. If we went through real design then develop phases >> then we could even put the version numbers in filenames or something to make it REALLY clear, but that isn't how OFBiz is (or has >> been) run. We could certainly go back and grab the XSDs from release branches and do something like what is proposed below on the >> ofbiz web site, and then search/replace all of the XSD URLs in XML files to point to the proper place for each branch. It would >> be a good improvement. > > Yes, BJ's proposition sounds like the easier for now. The script handles both dtd and javadoc. The problem, as ever, is... to do > it ;o) > > Jacques > >> -David >> >> >> On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> Here is a pragmatic answer from David http://markmail.org/message/lbxf4jxallv7yngq >>> And here another interesting (older) one which will please Chris >>> http://markmail.org/message/dbit6lgsprx2eywu >>> >>> Also for Eclipse >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-UsinglocaleXSDfilesinsteadofOFBizremote(at >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>>> The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not >>>> backwards. >>>> but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version >>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 >>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 >>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 >>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk >>>> >>>> the question comes who will maintain these. >>>> right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. >>>> scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. >>>> but then you have to go through the code and replace all the references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate >>>> release >>>> >>>> >>>> chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: >>>>> and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >>>>>> >>>>>> ========================= >>>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>>>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>>> >>>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
No hurry, thanks BJ!
Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > Ok you twisted my arm. > will make a jira as soon as I have the files to put in. > > > > >>Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/18/2010 2:18 PM: >> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> >>> BTW, about that email from me: I don't think that is the best solution >>> for the project in general. It is a good option for individual >>> developers and users, and maybe the best option unless the project >>> takes a different approach. >> >> Yes, I agree it's 2 different things. I have asked recently to have >> separated XSDs online. I did not thought about JavaDocs. The online Help >> would be good also... >> >>> For example, it would be great to have separate URLs for different >>> versions. If we went through real design then develop phases then we >>> could even put the version numbers in filenames or something to make >>> it REALLY clear, but that isn't how OFBiz is (or has been) run. We >>> could certainly go back and grab the XSDs from release branches and do >>> something like what is proposed below on the ofbiz web site, and then >>> search/replace all of the XSD URLs in XML files to point to the proper >>> place for each branch. It would be a good improvement. >> >> Yes, BJ's proposition sounds like the easier for now. The script handles >> both dtd and javadoc. The problem, as ever, is... to do it ;o) >> >> Jacques >> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>>> Here is a pragmatic answer from David >>>> http://markmail.org/message/lbxf4jxallv7yngq >>>> And here another interesting (older) one which will please Chris >>>> http://markmail.org/message/dbit6lgsprx2eywu >>>> >>>> Also for Eclipse >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-UsinglocaleXSDfilesinsteadofOFBizremote(at >>>> >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>>>> The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some >>>>> internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not >>>>> backwards. >>>>> but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version >>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 >>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 >>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 >>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk >>>>> >>>>> the question comes who will maintain these. >>>>> right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. >>>>> scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. >>>>> but then you have to go through the code and replace all the >>>>> references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate release >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: >>>>>> and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ========================= >>>>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>>>>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>>>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > |
LOL it was meant in Jest.
when have you ever seen me hurry. ROFLMAO Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/18/2010 3:30 PM: > No hurry, thanks BJ! > > Jacques > > From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >> Ok you twisted my arm. >> will make a jira as soon as I have the files to put in. >> >> >> >> >>Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/18/2010 2:18 PM: >>> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> >>>> BTW, about that email from me: I don't think that is the best solution >>>> for the project in general. It is a good option for individual >>>> developers and users, and maybe the best option unless the project >>>> takes a different approach. >>> >>> Yes, I agree it's 2 different things. I have asked recently to have >>> separated XSDs online. I did not thought about JavaDocs. The online Help >>> would be good also... >>> >>>> For example, it would be great to have separate URLs for different >>>> versions. If we went through real design then develop phases then we >>>> could even put the version numbers in filenames or something to make >>>> it REALLY clear, but that isn't how OFBiz is (or has been) run. We >>>> could certainly go back and grab the XSDs from release branches and do >>>> something like what is proposed below on the ofbiz web site, and then >>>> search/replace all of the XSD URLs in XML files to point to the proper >>>> place for each branch. It would be a good improvement. >>> >>> Yes, BJ's proposition sounds like the easier for now. The script handles >>> both dtd and javadoc. The problem, as ever, is... to do it ;o) >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here is a pragmatic answer from David >>>>> http://markmail.org/message/lbxf4jxallv7yngq >>>>> And here another interesting (older) one which will please Chris >>>>> http://markmail.org/message/dbit6lgsprx2eywu >>>>> >>>>> Also for Eclipse >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-UsinglocaleXSDfilesinsteadofOFBizremote(at >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>>>>> The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some >>>>>> internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not >>>>>> backwards. >>>>>> but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version >>>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 >>>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 >>>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 >>>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk >>>>>> >>>>>> the question comes who will maintain these. >>>>>> right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. >>>>>> scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. >>>>>> but then you have to go through the code and replace all the >>>>>> references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate >>>>>> release >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: >>>>>>> and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >>>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ========================= >>>>>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>>>>>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>>>>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > |
Administrator
|
I should have some cycles in the next weeks, I will help too, at least on the XSD side.
Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > LOL it was meant in Jest. > when have you ever seen me hurry. > ROFLMAO > > Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/18/2010 3:30 PM: >> No hurry, thanks BJ! >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>> Ok you twisted my arm. >>> will make a jira as soon as I have the files to put in. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/18/2010 2:18 PM: >>>> From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> >>>>> BTW, about that email from me: I don't think that is the best solution >>>>> for the project in general. It is a good option for individual >>>>> developers and users, and maybe the best option unless the project >>>>> takes a different approach. >>>> >>>> Yes, I agree it's 2 different things. I have asked recently to have >>>> separated XSDs online. I did not thought about JavaDocs. The online Help >>>> would be good also... >>>> >>>>> For example, it would be great to have separate URLs for different >>>>> versions. If we went through real design then develop phases then we >>>>> could even put the version numbers in filenames or something to make >>>>> it REALLY clear, but that isn't how OFBiz is (or has been) run. We >>>>> could certainly go back and grab the XSDs from release branches and do >>>>> something like what is proposed below on the ofbiz web site, and then >>>>> search/replace all of the XSD URLs in XML files to point to the proper >>>>> place for each branch. It would be a good improvement. >>>> >>>> Yes, BJ's proposition sounds like the easier for now. The script handles >>>> both dtd and javadoc. The problem, as ever, is... to do it ;o) >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Here is a pragmatic answer from David >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/lbxf4jxallv7yngq >>>>>> And here another interesting (older) one which will please Chris >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/dbit6lgsprx2eywu >>>>>> >>>>>> Also for Eclipse >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-UsinglocaleXSDfilesinsteadofOFBizremote(at >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> The xsd are covered by using the internal ones. 9.04 started some >>>>>>> internal doc of the xsd. and it has progress in trunk but not >>>>>>> backwards. >>>>>>> but maybe a discussion about the Xsd being set for each version >>>>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/4.0 >>>>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/9.04 >>>>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/10.04 >>>>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/trunk >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the question comes who will maintain these. >>>>>>> right now there is a script that export the xsd's from the svn. >>>>>>> scripts would have to be exported for each branch as well. >>>>>>> but then you have to go through the code and replace all the >>>>>>> references to http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ for the appropriate >>>>>>> release >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> chris snow sent the following on 9/18/2010 10:43 AM: >>>>>>>> and xsd's? http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, BJ Freeman<[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> should we have one for each release 4.0,9.04, 10.04 and trunk >>>>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ========================= >>>>>>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >>>>>>>>> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>>>>>> Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |