I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? -David |
Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit :
> > I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) > > After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). > > Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? Please proceed ! > > -David > > -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz |
In reply to this post by David E. Jones-2
how about opening it up to others testing before.
unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk. ========================= BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM: > I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) > > After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). > > Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? > > -David > > |
It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira). By all means, test away! -David On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: > how about opening it up to others testing before. > unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk. > > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> > > > David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM: >> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >> >> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >> >> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >> >> -David >> >> > > |
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
must have missed the previous email.
downloaded and testing started. thanks :D ========================= BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 8:14 AM: > It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira). > > By all means, test away! > > -David > > > On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: > >> how about opening it up to others testing before. >> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk. >> >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> >> >> >> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM: >>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >>> >>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >>> >>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >> > > |
It would be great to get these features into the trunk - looking forward to hearing more about testing.
Cheers, Ruppert On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > must have missed the previous email. > downloaded and testing started. > thanks > :D > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> > > > David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 8:14 AM: >> It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira). >> >> By all means, test away! >> >> -David >> >> >> On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: >> >>> how about opening it up to others testing before. >>> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk. >>> >>> >>> ========================= >>> BJ Freeman >>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>> >>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>> >>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> >>> >>> >>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM: >>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >>>> >>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >>>> >>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > |
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
then I hope there more is just me testing.
:D ========================= BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> Tim Ruppert sent the following on 3/24/2010 12:08 PM: > It would be great to get these features into the trunk - looking forward to hearing more about testing. > > Cheers, > Ruppert > > On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > >> must have missed the previous email. >> downloaded and testing started. >> thanks >> :D >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> >> >> >> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 8:14 AM: >>> It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira). >>> >>> By all means, test away! >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>> >>>> how about opening it up to others testing before. >>>> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk. >>>> >>>> >>>> ========================= >>>> BJ Freeman >>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>> >>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>> >>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> >>>> >>>> >>>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM: >>>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >>>>> >>>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >>>>> >>>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > |
In reply to this post by David E. Jones-2
David,
Could we make it so that the multi-tenant login can be shut off for sites that don't use it? Maybe have a property setting somewhere that hides the tenant login field when set to false. -Adrian David E Jones wrote: > I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) > > After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). > > Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? > > -David > > |
In reply to this post by David E. Jones-2
Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit :
> > I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) > > After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). > > Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? > > -David > > do we have a wiki page to explain how to use multi-tenant ? Thanks, -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz |
In reply to this post by Adrian Crum
Yes, we could certainly do something like that. -David On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > David, > > Could we make it so that the multi-tenant login can be shut off for sites that don't use it? Maybe have a property setting somewhere that hides the tenant login field when set to false. > > -Adrian > > David E Jones wrote: >> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >> -David |
In reply to this post by Erwan de FERRIERES
On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: > Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit : >> >> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >> >> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >> >> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >> >> -David >> >> > David, > > do we have a wiki page to explain how to use multi-tenant ? AFAIK the answer is no, we don't. There are comments in the tenant demo data file. The general process to set it up would look something like: =========================================== $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk ofbiz $ ant $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO1 $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO2 $ ant run =========================================== Note that the long java lines instead of something like "ant run-install" are used in order to be able to specify a delegatorName. -David |
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
would it be better to have a jira or wiki to deal with concerns found or
use the ML. ========================= BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> BJ Freeman sent the following on 3/24/2010 2:31 PM: > then I hope there more is just me testing. > :D > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> > > > Tim Ruppert sent the following on 3/24/2010 12:08 PM: >> It would be great to get these features into the trunk - looking forward to hearing more about testing. >> >> Cheers, >> Ruppert >> >> On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: >> >>> must have missed the previous email. >>> downloaded and testing started. >>> thanks >>> :D >>> >>> ========================= >>> BJ Freeman >>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>> >>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>> >>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> >>> >>> >>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 8:14 AM: >>>> It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira). >>>> >>>> By all means, test away! >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>>> >>>>> how about opening it up to others testing before. >>>>> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ========================= >>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>> >>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>> >>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM: >>>>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >>>>>> >>>>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >>>>>> >>>>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >>>>>> >>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>> >> > > > |
In reply to this post by Erwan de FERRIERES
probably operator error
did what you show here. except used eclipse to access svn. from patch + <TenantUserLogin tenantId="DEMO1" userLoginId="admin" fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" thruDate="" isManager="Y"/> startofbiz.bat https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/main logged in admin ofbiz DEMO1 O=letter O on page The Following Errors Occurred: following error occurred during login: User not found. with DEM01 0=zero on the page The Following Errors Occurred: Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: Problems processing event: java.lang.NullPointerException (null) in the log(I cut it short so let me know if you want the whole thing) 2010-03-25 20:15:12,796 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) [DelegatorFactoryImpl.java:30 :INFO ] Creating new delegator [default#DEM01] (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) 2010-03-25 20:15:12,796 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) [DelegatorFactoryImpl.java:35 :ERROR] ---- exception report ---------------------------------------------------------- Error creating delegator Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException Message: No Tenant record found for delegator [default#DEM01] with tenantId [DEM01] ========================= BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> David E Jones sent the following on 3/25/2010 9:44 AM: > On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: > >> Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit : >>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >>> >>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >>> >>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >> David, >> >> do we have a wiki page to explain how to use multi-tenant ? > > AFAIK the answer is no, we don't. > > There are comments in the tenant demo data file. The general process to set it up would look something like: > > =========================================== > $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk ofbiz > $ ant > $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default > $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO1 > $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO2 > $ ant run > =========================================== > > Note that the long java lines instead of something like "ant run-install" are used in order to be able to specify a delegatorName. > > -David > > |
In reply to this post by Erwan de FERRIERES
Ok looked at it this morning an see the space between # and DEMO1
debugging ========================= BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> BJ Freeman sent the following on 3/25/2010 8:41 PM: > probably operator error > did what you show here. > except used eclipse to access svn. > from patch > + <TenantUserLogin tenantId="DEMO1" userLoginId="admin" > fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" thruDate="" isManager="Y"/> > > startofbiz.bat > https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/main > logged in > admin > ofbiz > DEMO1 O=letter O > on page > > > The Following Errors Occurred: > > following error occurred during login: User not found. > with > DEM01 0=zero > > on the page > The Following Errors Occurred: > > Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: > Problems processing event: java.lang.NullPointerException (null) > > in the log(I cut it short so let me know if you want the whole thing) > > 2010-03-25 20:15:12,796 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) > [DelegatorFactoryImpl.java:30 :INFO ] Creating new delegator > [default#DEM01] (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) > 2010-03-25 20:15:12,796 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) > [DelegatorFactoryImpl.java:35 :ERROR] > ---- exception report > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Error creating delegator > Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException > Message: No Tenant record found for delegator [default#DEM01] with > tenantId [DEM01] > > > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> > > > David E Jones sent the following on 3/25/2010 9:44 AM: >> On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >> >>> Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit : >>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :) >>>> >>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too). >>>> >>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk? >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>> David, >>> >>> do we have a wiki page to explain how to use multi-tenant ? >> AFAIK the answer is no, we don't. >> >> There are comments in the tenant demo data file. The general process to set it up would look something like: >> >> =========================================== >> $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk ofbiz >> $ ant >> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default >> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO1 >> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO2 >> $ ant run >> =========================================== >> >> Note that the long java lines instead of something like "ant run-install" are used in order to be able to specify a delegatorName. >> >> -David >> >> > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |