Merging multitenant branch into trunk

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Merging multitenant branch into trunk

David E. Jones-2

I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)

After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).

Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?

-David

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit :
>
> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>
> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>
> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?

Please proceed !

>
> -David
>
>


--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by David E. Jones-2
how about opening it up to others testing before.
unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk.


=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>


David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM:
> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>
> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>
> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>
> -David
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

David E. Jones-2

It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira).

By all means, test away!

-David


On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:

> how about opening it up to others testing before.
> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk.
>
>
> =========================
> BJ Freeman
> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>
> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
> Linkedin
> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>
>
> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM:
>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>>
>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>>
>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
must have missed the previous email.
downloaded and testing started.
thanks
:D

=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>


David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 8:14 AM:

> It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira).
>
> By all means, test away!
>
> -David
>
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
>> how about opening it up to others testing before.
>> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk.
>>
>>
>> =========================
>> BJ Freeman
>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>>
>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>
>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>> Linkedin
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>>
>>
>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM:
>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>>>
>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>>>
>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

Tim Ruppert
It would be great to get these features into the trunk - looking forward to hearing more about testing.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:

> must have missed the previous email.
> downloaded and testing started.
> thanks
> :D
>
> =========================
> BJ Freeman
> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>
> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
> Linkedin
> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>
>
> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 8:14 AM:
>> It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira).
>>
>> By all means, test away!
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> how about opening it up to others testing before.
>>> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk.
>>>
>>>
>>> =========================
>>> BJ Freeman
>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>>>
>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>>
>>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>>> Linkedin
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>>>
>>>
>>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM:
>>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>>>>
>>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
then I hope there more is just me testing.
:D

=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>


Tim Ruppert sent the following on 3/24/2010 12:08 PM:

> It would be great to get these features into the trunk - looking forward to hearing more about testing.
>
> Cheers,
> Ruppert
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
>> must have missed the previous email.
>> downloaded and testing started.
>> thanks
>> :D
>>
>> =========================
>> BJ Freeman
>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>>
>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>
>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>> Linkedin
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>>
>>
>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 8:14 AM:
>>> It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira).
>>>
>>> By all means, test away!
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>>
>>>> how about opening it up to others testing before.
>>>> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> =========================
>>>> BJ Freeman
>>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>>>>
>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>>>
>>>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>>>> Linkedin
>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM:
>>>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>>>>>
>>>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

Adrian Crum
In reply to this post by David E. Jones-2
David,

Could we make it so that the multi-tenant login can be shut off for
sites that don't use it? Maybe have a property setting somewhere that
hides the tenant login field when set to false.

-Adrian

David E Jones wrote:
> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>
> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>
> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>
> -David
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

Erwan de FERRIERES
In reply to this post by David E. Jones-2
Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit :

>
> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>
> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>
> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>
> -David
>
>
David,

do we have a wiki page to explain how to use multi-tenant ?

Thanks,


--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

David E. Jones-2
In reply to this post by Adrian Crum

Yes, we could certainly do something like that.

-David


On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> David,
>
> Could we make it so that the multi-tenant login can be shut off for sites that don't use it? Maybe have a property setting somewhere that hides the tenant login field when set to false.
>
> -Adrian
>
> David E Jones wrote:
>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>> -David

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

David E. Jones-2
In reply to this post by Erwan de FERRIERES

On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:

> Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit :
>>
>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>>
>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>>
>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
> David,
>
> do we have a wiki page to explain how to use multi-tenant ?

AFAIK the answer is no, we don't.

There are comments in the tenant demo data file. The general process to set it up would look something like:

===========================================
$ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk ofbiz
$ ant
$ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default
$ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO1
$ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO2
$ ant run
===========================================

Note that the long java lines instead of something like "ant run-install" are used in order to be able to specify a delegatorName.

-David

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
would it be better to have a jira or wiki to deal with concerns found or
use the ML.

=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>


BJ Freeman sent the following on 3/24/2010 2:31 PM:

> then I hope there more is just me testing.
> :D
>
> =========================
> BJ Freeman
> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>
> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
> Linkedin
> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>
>
> Tim Ruppert sent the following on 3/24/2010 12:08 PM:
>> It would be great to get these features into the trunk - looking forward to hearing more about testing.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ruppert
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> must have missed the previous email.
>>> downloaded and testing started.
>>> thanks
>>> :D
>>>
>>> =========================
>>> BJ Freeman
>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>>>
>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>>
>>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>>> Linkedin
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>>>
>>>
>>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 8:14 AM:
>>>> It's been open for testing for a few weeks now, first in a patch and then in the branch in SVN (and announced once on this mailing list for each place, plus through jira).
>>>>
>>>> By all means, test away!
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:33 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> how about opening it up to others testing before.
>>>>> unless you feel that can be done better in the trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> =========================
>>>>> BJ Freeman
>>>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
>>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>>>>
>>>>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>>>>> Linkedin
>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> David E Jones sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:07 AM:
>>>>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by Erwan de FERRIERES
probably operator error
did what you show here.
except used eclipse to access svn.
from patch
+    <TenantUserLogin tenantId="DEMO1" userLoginId="admin"
fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" thruDate="" isManager="Y"/>

startofbiz.bat
https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/main
logged in
admin
ofbiz
DEMO1 O=letter O
on page


The Following Errors Occurred:

following error occurred during login: User not found.
with
DEM01  0=zero

on the page
 The Following Errors Occurred:

 Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException:
Problems processing event: java.lang.NullPointerException (null)

in the log(I cut it short so let me know if you want the whole thing)

2010-03-25 20:15:12,796 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2)
[DelegatorFactoryImpl.java:30 :INFO ] Creating new delegator
[default#DEM01] (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2)
2010-03-25 20:15:12,796 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2)
[DelegatorFactoryImpl.java:35 :ERROR]
---- exception report
----------------------------------------------------------
Error creating delegator
Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException
Message: No Tenant record found for delegator [default#DEM01] with
tenantId [DEM01]



=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>


David E Jones sent the following on 3/25/2010 9:44 AM:

> On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
>
>> Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit :
>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>>>
>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>>>
>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>> David,
>>
>> do we have a wiki page to explain how to use multi-tenant ?
>
> AFAIK the answer is no, we don't.
>
> There are comments in the tenant demo data file. The general process to set it up would look something like:
>
> ===========================================
> $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk ofbiz
> $ ant
> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default
> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO1
> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO2
> $ ant run
> ===========================================
>
> Note that the long java lines instead of something like "ant run-install" are used in order to be able to specify a delegatorName.
>
> -David
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

BJ Freeman
In reply to this post by Erwan de FERRIERES
Ok looked at it this morning an see the space between # and DEMO1
debugging

=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>


BJ Freeman sent the following on 3/25/2010 8:41 PM:

> probably operator error
> did what you show here.
> except used eclipse to access svn.
> from patch
> +    <TenantUserLogin tenantId="DEMO1" userLoginId="admin"
> fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" thruDate="" isManager="Y"/>
>
> startofbiz.bat
> https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/main
> logged in
> admin
> ofbiz
> DEMO1 O=letter O
> on page
>
>
> The Following Errors Occurred:
>
> following error occurred during login: User not found.
> with
> DEM01  0=zero
>
> on the page
>  The Following Errors Occurred:
>
>  Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException:
> Problems processing event: java.lang.NullPointerException (null)
>
> in the log(I cut it short so let me know if you want the whole thing)
>
> 2010-03-25 20:15:12,796 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2)
> [DelegatorFactoryImpl.java:30 :INFO ] Creating new delegator
> [default#DEM01] (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2)
> 2010-03-25 20:15:12,796 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2)
> [DelegatorFactoryImpl.java:35 :ERROR]
> ---- exception report
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Error creating delegator
> Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException
> Message: No Tenant record found for delegator [default#DEM01] with
> tenantId [DEM01]
>
>
>
> =========================
> BJ Freeman
> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>
> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
> Linkedin
> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
>
>
> David E Jones sent the following on 3/25/2010 9:44 AM:
>> On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
>>
>>> Le 24/03/2010 09:07, David E Jones a écrit :
>>>> I'm working on getting the multitenant branch updated with all of the trunk changes, and I'd rather not have to do this too many times... :)
>>>>
>>>> After a fair amount of testing everything seems to be working fine with the multitenant changes (and the automated tests all pass now too).
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone opposed to getting the multitenant branch merged back into the trunk?
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> do we have a wiki page to explain how to use multi-tenant ?
>> AFAIK the answer is no, we don't.
>>
>> There are comments in the tenant demo data file. The general process to set it up would look something like:
>>
>> ===========================================
>> $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk ofbiz
>> $ ant
>> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default
>> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO1
>> $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO2
>> $ ant run
>> ===========================================
>>
>> Note that the long java lines instead of something like "ant run-install" are used in order to be able to specify a delegatorName.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>
>
>