Hi All,
I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the General questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try again on a new thread. I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager Reference PDFs to Wiki format. I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section so was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at: http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by others as the project develops? Ian |
Hi Ian
I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there until any major revisions have been completed. How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content of the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them further then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once any efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could then be moved over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has been done. I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go myself at one point). Thanks Scott Ian McNulty wrote: > Hi All, > > I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the General > questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try again on a new > thread. > > I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager > Reference PDFs to Wiki format. > > I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section so > was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at: > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References > > Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a > public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by > others as the project develops? > > Ian > |
Yes,
kudos to Ian for his huge work on this, I'm really impressed and I want to personally thank him for this (but I'm sure others here will agree with Scott and me on this). I agree with Scott that we should try to improve these docs in the Wiki if there is some interest from the community in this task; in the meantime we could update the official links from the ofbiz site to point to the pages that Ian migrated in the Wiki. Jacopo Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Ian > > I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section that > you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there until any > major revisions have been completed. > How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content of > the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them further > then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once any efforts to > improve them have slowed down, they could then be moved over to the > OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has been done. > I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you > decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). > > Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I can > guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go myself at > one point). > > Thanks > Scott > > Ian McNulty wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the General >> questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try again on a new >> thread. >> >> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager >> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. >> >> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section so >> was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at: >> >> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References >> >> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a >> public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by >> others as the project develops? >> >> Ian >> |
Jacopo,
Your thanks are much appreciated. Curiously, the post from Scott which you're replying to here still hasn't arrived in my inbox. Some kind of screw up on server hops means it's currently bashing around some minor island in the Pacific no doubt ;) Some kind of improvement on the docs would certainly be appreciated from my end. To paraphrase Harrison Ford, I might have been able to translate this stuff into Wiki markup but that doesn't mean I understand anything they say. I'm only pleased to be able to make some kind of contribution to the community and can only hope that others will be able to develop them into something that might help to facilitate the larger end-user base David referred to earlier. Best, Ian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Yes, > > kudos to Ian for his huge work on this, I'm really impressed and I > want to personally thank him for this (but I'm sure others here will > agree with Scott and me on this). > I agree with Scott that we should try to improve these docs in the > Wiki if there is some interest from the community in this task; in the > meantime we could update the official links from the ofbiz site to > point to the pages that Ian migrated in the Wiki. > > Jacopo > > Scott Gray wrote: >> Hi Ian >> >> I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section >> that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there >> until any major revisions have been completed. >> How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content >> of the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them >> further then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once any >> efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could then be moved >> over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has been done. >> I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you >> decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). >> >> Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I >> can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go >> myself at one point). >> >> Thanks >> Scott >> >> Ian McNulty wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the General >>> questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try again on a >>> new thread. >>> >>> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager >>> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. >>> >>> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section so >>> was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at: >>> >>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References >>> >>> >>> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a >>> public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by >>> others as the project develops? >>> >>> Ian >>> > > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- mcnultyMEDIA 60 Birkdale Gardens Durham DH1 2UL t: +44 (0)191 384 4736 e: [hidden email] w: www.mcnultymedia.co.uk ============================================================================================== This communication is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) named above and is confidential. Any form of distribution, copying, discussion or use of this communication, its contents, or any information contained herein without prior consent is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender by email or by telephone on +44 (0)191 384 4736 This email has been checked for viruses, however, we cannot accept any liability sustained as a result of software viruses and would recommend that you carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. ============================================================================================== |
In reply to this post by Scott Gray
Hi Scott,
Your message arrived at last! Many thanks. Yes it was very laborious work. Getting on for a hundred hours in total if you include finding the right software for the conversion, researching the extent of the currently existing fragments in the Wiki, learning the Wiki markup etc. And not great for the RSI in my mouse arm either. A dirty job, but somebody had to to it ;) I really am a bit reluctant to comment any more than I already have on the current content of the docs. As far as I understand it, they were written by a professional technical writer (which I certainly am not) and cost something like $40,000 to produce, so they are of considerable value as they stand. I treated them as such, and made every effort not to drop even one single word. As for developing them further, I'm afraid this is way out of my league. Two months after installing OFBiz, I still don't feel confident I know how to work it myself, let alone teach anybody else. I originally started translating the PDFs into editable format with the aim of re-jigging them into something that I or any of my clients might be able to use. But after more than a week's work I eventually had to admit defeat and decided simply to translate them as they stood in the hope that others might succeed where I had failed. So any further development of this material really would need to be done by anybody else except me. I appreciate your offer of help in answering any questions I might have, but there are so many that answering them all would probably mean having to write an entire User's Manual yourself, which would kindof defeat the purpose of the exercise! That said, your thanks are appreciated. I just hope that these docs can now be developed into something useful and that I have been able to make some kind of contribution towards the further development of the OFBiz end-user community. Best, Ian Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Ian > > I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section > that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there > until any major revisions have been completed. > How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content of > the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them > further then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once any > efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could then be moved > over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has been done. > I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you > decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). > > Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I > can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go myself > at one point). > > Thanks > Scott > > Ian McNulty wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the General >> questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try again on a new >> thread. >> >> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager >> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. >> >> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section so >> was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at: >> >> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References >> >> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a >> public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by >> others as the project develops? >> >> Ian >> > > |
Administrator
|
Ian,
For RSI in mouse arm. Did you ever try to use both arms alternatively (by days or hours) ? Balance is a zen way... Use of softwares like Workpace (Windows) or Workrave may be interesting too. One more time : thanks for your brave work ! Jacques ----- Message d'origine ----- De : "Ian McNulty" <[hidden email]> À : <[hidden email]> Envoyé : mercredi 7 mars 2007 14:17 Objet : Re: Migration of Manager Ref PDFs to Wiki Format > Hi Scott, > > Your message arrived at last! Many thanks. > > Yes it was very laborious work. Getting on for a hundred hours in total > if you include finding the right software for the conversion, > researching the extent of the currently existing fragments in the Wiki, > learning the Wiki markup etc. And not great for the RSI in my mouse arm > either. A dirty job, but somebody had to to it ;) > > I really am a bit reluctant to comment any more than I already have on > the current content of the docs. As far as I understand it, they were > written by a professional technical writer (which I certainly am not) > and cost something like $40,000 to produce, so they are of considerable > value as they stand. I treated them as such, and made every effort not > to drop even one single word. > > As for developing them further, I'm afraid this is way out of my league. > Two months after installing OFBiz, I still don't feel confident I know > how to work it myself, let alone teach anybody else. > > I originally started translating the PDFs into editable format with the > aim of re-jigging them into something that I or any of my clients might > be able to use. But after more than a week's work I eventually had to > admit defeat and decided simply to translate them as they stood in the > hope that others might succeed where I had failed. So any further > development of this material really would need to be done by anybody > else except me. > > I appreciate your offer of help in answering any questions I might hav e, > but there are so many that answering them all would probably mean having > to write an entire User's Manual yourself, which would kindof defeat the > purpose of the exercise! > > That said, your thanks are appreciated. I just hope that these docs can > now be developed into something useful and that I have been able to make > some kind of contribution towards the further development of the OFBiz > end-user community. > > Best, > > Ian > > > > Scott Gray wrote: > > Hi Ian > > > > I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section > > that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there > > until any major revisions have been completed. > > How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content > > the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them > > further then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once any > > efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could then be moved > > over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has been done. > > I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you > > decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). > > > > Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I > > can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go myself > > at one point). > > > > Thanks > > Scott > > > > Ian McNulty wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the General > >> questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try again on a new > >> thread. > >> > >> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager > >> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. > >> > >> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section so > >> was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at: > >> > >> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References > >> > >> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a > >> public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by > >> others as the project develops? > >> > >> Ian > >> > > > > |
Jacques,
Your kind thoughts are much appreciated. You're not the first person to suggest alternating arms. I've tried it, but I do most of my work in graphics and video applications where using a mouse is more like using a pen. Yes, you can do it left handed, but it's not a pretty sight! So I've just kept on trying to ignore the pain - which is actually worryingly easy when you're absorbed in what you're doing. It's reminding yourself to do the exercises that's the difficult bit. Which is why your suggestions on software are nothing short of brilliant. I never even guessed such things existed and never thought to look. I'm downloading Workrave as we speak. What a discovery. I owe you one. Many thanks. Best, Ian Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Ian, > > For RSI in mouse arm. Did you ever try to use both arms alternatively > (by days or hours) ? Balance is a zen way... > Use of softwares like Workpace (Windows) or Workrave may be interesting > too. > > One more time : thanks for your brave work ! > > Jacques > > ----- Message d'origine ----- > De : "Ian McNulty" <[hidden email]> > À : <[hidden email]> > Envoyé : mercredi 7 mars 2007 14:17 > Objet : Re: Migration of Manager Ref PDFs to Wiki Format > > > >> Hi Scott, >> >> Your message arrived at last! Many thanks. >> >> Yes it was very laborious work. Getting on for a hundred hours in >> > total > >> if you include finding the right software for the conversion, >> researching the extent of the currently existing fragments in the >> > Wiki, > >> learning the Wiki markup etc. And not great for the RSI in my mouse >> > arm > >> either. A dirty job, but somebody had to to it ;) >> >> I really am a bit reluctant to comment any more than I already have on >> the current content of the docs. As far as I understand it, they were >> written by a professional technical writer (which I certainly am not) >> and cost something like $40,000 to produce, so they are of >> > considerable > >> value as they stand. I treated them as such, and made every effort not >> to drop even one single word. >> >> As for developing them further, I'm afraid this is way out of my >> > league. > >> Two months after installing OFBiz, I still don't feel confident I know >> how to work it myself, let alone teach anybody else. >> >> I originally started translating the PDFs into editable format with >> > the > >> aim of re-jigging them into something that I or any of my clients >> > might > >> be able to use. But after more than a week's work I eventually had to >> admit defeat and decided simply to translate them as they stood in the >> hope that others might succeed where I had failed. So any further >> development of this material really would need to be done by anybody >> else except me. >> >> I appreciate your offer of help in answering any questions I might hav >> > e, > >> but there are so many that answering them all would probably mean >> > having > >> to write an entire User's Manual yourself, which would kindof defeat >> > the > >> purpose of the exercise! >> >> That said, your thanks are appreciated. I just hope that these docs >> > can > >> now be developed into something useful and that I have been able to >> > make > >> some kind of contribution towards the further development of the OFBiz >> end-user community. >> >> Best, >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> Scott Gray wrote: >> >>> Hi Ian >>> >>> I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section >>> that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there >>> until any major revisions have been completed. >>> How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content >>> > of > >>> the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them >>> further then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once >>> > any > >>> efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could then be moved >>> over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has been done. >>> I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you >>> decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). >>> >>> Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I >>> can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go >>> > myself > >>> at one point). >>> >>> Thanks >>> Scott >>> >>> Ian McNulty wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the >>>> > General > >>>> questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try again on a >>>> > new > >>>> thread. >>>> >>>> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager >>>> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. >>>> >>>> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section >>>> > so > >>>> was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at: >>>> >>>> >>>> > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References > >>>> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a >>>> public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by >>>> others as the project develops? >>>> >>>> Ian >>>> >>>> >>> > > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- mcnultyMEDIA 60 Birkdale Gardens Durham DH1 2UL t: +44 (0)191 384 4736 e: [hidden email] w: www.mcnultymedia.co.uk ============================================================================================== This communication is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) named above and is confidential. Any form of distribution, copying, discussion or use of this communication, its contents, or any information contained herein without prior consent is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender by email or by telephone on +44 (0)191 384 4736 This email has been checked for viruses, however, we cannot accept any liability sustained as a result of software viruses and would recommend that you carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. ============================================================================================== |
In reply to this post by Ian McNulty
Thanks for the details on this Ian. I think based on this what Scott proposed was a good idea, but it's probably best to move this over to the end user doc space now and then get it into the normal doc management process we hope for (ie allow people to casually comment on it, but have a smaller and hopefully more experienced and dedicated group actually changing it. -David On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:17 AM, Ian McNulty wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Your message arrived at last! Many thanks. > > Yes it was very laborious work. Getting on for a hundred hours in > total if you include finding the right software for the conversion, > researching the extent of the currently existing fragments in the > Wiki, learning the Wiki markup etc. And not great for the RSI in my > mouse arm either. A dirty job, but somebody had to to it ;) > > I really am a bit reluctant to comment any more than I already have > on the current content of the docs. As far as I understand it, they > were written by a professional technical writer (which I certainly > am not) and cost something like $40,000 to produce, so they are of > considerable value as they stand. I treated them as such, and made > every effort not to drop even one single word. > > As for developing them further, I'm afraid this is way out of my > league. Two months after installing OFBiz, I still don't feel > confident I know how to work it myself, let alone teach anybody else. > > I originally started translating the PDFs into editable format with > the aim of re-jigging them into something that I or any of my > clients might be able to use. But after more than a week's work I > eventually had to admit defeat and decided simply to translate them > as they stood in the hope that others might succeed where I had > failed. So any further development of this material really would > need to be done by anybody else except me. > > I appreciate your offer of help in answering any questions I might > have, but there are so many that answering them all would probably > mean having to write an entire User's Manual yourself, which would > kindof defeat the purpose of the exercise! > > That said, your thanks are appreciated. I just hope that these docs > can now be developed into something useful and that I have been > able to make some kind of contribution towards the further > development of the OFBiz end-user community. > > Best, > > Ian > > > > Scott Gray wrote: >> Hi Ian >> >> I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs >> section that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving >> them there until any major revisions have been completed. >> How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current >> content of the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute >> to them further then that should take place on the wiki for now, >> and once any efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could >> then be moved over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work >> that has been done. >> I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you >> decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). >> >> Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and >> I can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go >> myself at one point). >> >> Thanks >> Scott >> >> Ian McNulty wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the >>> General questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try >>> again on a new thread. >>> >>> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager >>> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. >>> >>> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section >>> so was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home >>> page at: >>> >>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager >>> +References >>> >>> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into >>> a public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and >>> refined by others as the project develops? >>> >>> Ian >>> >> >> smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
I forgot to mention: I'll work on doing this later this week (hopefully... ;) ) if no one beats me to it. -David On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:40 PM, David E. Jones wrote: > > Thanks for the details on this Ian. I think based on this what > Scott proposed was a good idea, but it's probably best to move this > over to the end user doc space now and then get it into the normal > doc management process we hope for (ie allow people to casually > comment on it, but have a smaller and hopefully more experienced > and dedicated group actually changing it. > > -David > > > On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:17 AM, Ian McNulty wrote: > >> Hi Scott, >> >> Your message arrived at last! Many thanks. >> >> Yes it was very laborious work. Getting on for a hundred hours in >> total if you include finding the right software for the >> conversion, researching the extent of the currently existing >> fragments in the Wiki, learning the Wiki markup etc. And not great >> for the RSI in my mouse arm either. A dirty job, but somebody had >> to to it ;) >> >> I really am a bit reluctant to comment any more than I already >> have on the current content of the docs. As far as I understand >> it, they were written by a professional technical writer (which I >> certainly am not) and cost something like $40,000 to produce, so >> they are of considerable value as they stand. I treated them as >> such, and made every effort not to drop even one single word. >> >> As for developing them further, I'm afraid this is way out of my >> league. Two months after installing OFBiz, I still don't feel >> confident I know how to work it myself, let alone teach anybody else. >> >> I originally started translating the PDFs into editable format >> with the aim of re-jigging them into something that I or any of my >> clients might be able to use. But after more than a week's work I >> eventually had to admit defeat and decided simply to translate >> them as they stood in the hope that others might succeed where I >> had failed. So any further development of this material really >> would need to be done by anybody else except me. >> >> I appreciate your offer of help in answering any questions I might >> have, but there are so many that answering them all would probably >> mean having to write an entire User's Manual yourself, which would >> kindof defeat the purpose of the exercise! >> >> That said, your thanks are appreciated. I just hope that these >> docs can now be developed into something useful and that I have >> been able to make some kind of contribution towards the further >> development of the OFBiz end-user community. >> >> Best, >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> Hi Ian >>> >>> I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs >>> section that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving >>> them there until any major revisions have been completed. >>> How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current >>> content of the docs? If you or anyone else has time to >>> contribute to them further then that should take place on the >>> wiki for now, and once any efforts to improve them have slowed >>> down, they could then be moved over to the OFBENDUSER space to >>> protect the work that has been done. >>> I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if >>> you decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). >>> >>> Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and >>> I can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go >>> myself at one point). >>> >>> Thanks >>> Scott >>> >>> Ian McNulty wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the >>>> General questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try >>>> again on a new thread. >>>> >>>> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager >>>> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. >>>> >>>> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation >>>> section so was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence >>>> Home page at: >>>> >>>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager >>>> +References >>>> >>>> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved >>>> into a public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and >>>> refined by others as the project develops? >>>> >>>> Ian >>>> >>> >>> > smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by David E Jones
David,
Whatever you think best if fine with me. Thanks for letting me know. Ian David E. Jones wrote: > > Thanks for the details on this Ian. I think based on this what Scott > proposed was a good idea, but it's probably best to move this over to > the end user doc space now and then get it into the normal doc > management process we hope for (ie allow people to casually comment on > it, but have a smaller and hopefully more experienced and dedicated > group actually changing it. > > -David > > > On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:17 AM, Ian McNulty wrote: > >> Hi Scott, >> >> Your message arrived at last! Many thanks. >> >> Yes it was very laborious work. Getting on for a hundred hours in >> total if you include finding the right software for the conversion, >> researching the extent of the currently existing fragments in the >> Wiki, learning the Wiki markup etc. And not great for the RSI in my >> mouse arm either. A dirty job, but somebody had to to it ;) >> >> I really am a bit reluctant to comment any more than I already have >> on the current content of the docs. As far as I understand it, they >> were written by a professional technical writer (which I certainly am >> not) and cost something like $40,000 to produce, so they are of >> considerable value as they stand. I treated them as such, and made >> every effort not to drop even one single word. >> >> As for developing them further, I'm afraid this is way out of my >> league. Two months after installing OFBiz, I still don't feel >> confident I know how to work it myself, let alone teach anybody else. >> >> I originally started translating the PDFs into editable format with >> the aim of re-jigging them into something that I or any of my clients >> might be able to use. But after more than a week's work I eventually >> had to admit defeat and decided simply to translate them as they >> stood in the hope that others might succeed where I had failed. So >> any further development of this material really would need to be done >> by anybody else except me. >> >> I appreciate your offer of help in answering any questions I might >> have, but there are so many that answering them all would probably >> mean having to write an entire User's Manual yourself, which would >> kindof defeat the purpose of the exercise! >> >> That said, your thanks are appreciated. I just hope that these docs >> can now be developed into something useful and that I have been able >> to make some kind of contribution towards the further development of >> the OFBiz end-user community. >> >> Best, >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> Hi Ian >>> >>> I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section >>> that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there >>> until any major revisions have been completed. >>> How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content >>> of the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them >>> further then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once >>> any efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could then be >>> moved over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has been >>> done. >>> I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you >>> decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). >>> >>> Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I >>> can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go >>> myself at one point). >>> >>> Thanks >>> Scott >>> >>> Ian McNulty wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the >>>> General questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try >>>> again on a new thread. >>>> >>>> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager >>>> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. >>>> >>>> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section >>>> so was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at: >>>> >>>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References >>>> >>>> >>>> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a >>>> public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by >>>> others as the project develops? >>>> >>>> Ian >>>> >>> >>> > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- mcnultyMEDIA 60 Birkdale Gardens Durham DH1 2UL t: +44 (0)191 384 4736 e: [hidden email] w: www.mcnultymedia.co.uk ============================================================================================== This communication is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) named above and is confidential. Any form of distribution, copying, discussion or use of this communication, its contents, or any information contained herein without prior consent is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender by email or by telephone on +44 (0)191 384 4736 This email has been checked for viruses, however, we cannot accept any liability sustained as a result of software viruses and would recommend that you carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. ============================================================================================== |
In reply to this post by David E Jones
David,
I know you have enough to do already, so absolutely no rush from my end at all. One thing I do think essential is to consolidate the fragment that exist in the other locations I mentioned (itemised in my comments at http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBENDUSER/Areas+Being+Worked+On The reasoning behind my belief that pruning redundant material is even more important than adding new stuff, comes from Lavoisier's preface to the book generally perceived as being the foundation of modern chemistry, "Traité Elémentaire de Chimie." http://www.chem.yale.edu/~chem125/125/history99/2Pre1800/Lavoisier/Preface/discours.html "We think only through the medium of words. ----The art of reasoning is nothing more than a language well arranged." "Our only aim ought to be ease and perspicuity, and with the utmost care to keep every thing out of view which might draw aside the attention of the student; it is a road which we should be continually rendering more smooth, and from which we should endeavour to remove every obstacle which can occasion delay. Then again, Lavoisier was tried and executed as a traitor at the age of 51. As the judge said, "The Republic has no need of scientists." So he's not an act I'd particularly like to follow myself ;) Ian David E. Jones wrote: > > I forgot to mention: I'll work on doing this later this week > (hopefully... ;) ) if no one beats me to it. > > -David > > > On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:40 PM, David E. Jones wrote: > >> >> Thanks for the details on this Ian. I think based on this what Scott >> proposed was a good idea, but it's probably best to move this over to >> the end user doc space now and then get it into the normal doc >> management process we hope for (ie allow people to casually comment >> on it, but have a smaller and hopefully more experienced and >> dedicated group actually changing it. >> >> -David >> >> >> On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:17 AM, Ian McNulty wrote: >> >>> Hi Scott, >>> >>> Your message arrived at last! Many thanks. >>> >>> Yes it was very laborious work. Getting on for a hundred hours in >>> total if you include finding the right software for the conversion, >>> researching the extent of the currently existing fragments in the >>> Wiki, learning the Wiki markup etc. And not great for the RSI in my >>> mouse arm either. A dirty job, but somebody had to to it ;) >>> >>> I really am a bit reluctant to comment any more than I already have >>> on the current content of the docs. As far as I understand it, they >>> were written by a professional technical writer (which I certainly >>> am not) and cost something like $40,000 to produce, so they are of >>> considerable value as they stand. I treated them as such, and made >>> every effort not to drop even one single word. >>> >>> As for developing them further, I'm afraid this is way out of my >>> league. Two months after installing OFBiz, I still don't feel >>> confident I know how to work it myself, let alone teach anybody else. >>> >>> I originally started translating the PDFs into editable format with >>> the aim of re-jigging them into something that I or any of my >>> clients might be able to use. But after more than a week's work I >>> eventually had to admit defeat and decided simply to translate them >>> as they stood in the hope that others might succeed where I had >>> failed. So any further development of this material really would >>> need to be done by anybody else except me. >>> >>> I appreciate your offer of help in answering any questions I might >>> have, but there are so many that answering them all would probably >>> mean having to write an entire User's Manual yourself, which would >>> kindof defeat the purpose of the exercise! >>> >>> That said, your thanks are appreciated. I just hope that these docs >>> can now be developed into something useful and that I have been able >>> to make some kind of contribution towards the further development of >>> the OFBiz end-user community. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Ian >>> >>> >>> >>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>> Hi Ian >>>> >>>> I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section >>>> that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there >>>> until any major revisions have been completed. >>>> How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content >>>> of the docs? If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them >>>> further then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once >>>> any efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could then be >>>> moved over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has >>>> been done. >>>> I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you >>>> decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too). >>>> >>>> Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I >>>> can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go >>>> myself at one point). >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> Ian McNulty wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the >>>>> General questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try >>>>> again on a new thread. >>>>> >>>>> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager >>>>> Reference PDFs to Wiki format. >>>>> >>>>> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section >>>>> so was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page >>>>> at: >>>>> >>>>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/~ian@.../Manager+References >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into >>>>> a public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined >>>>> by others as the project develops? >>>>> >>>>> Ian >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- mcnultyMEDIA 60 Birkdale Gardens Durham DH1 2UL t: +44 (0)191 384 4736 e: [hidden email] w: www.mcnultymedia.co.uk ============================================================================================== This communication is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) named above and is confidential. Any form of distribution, copying, discussion or use of this communication, its contents, or any information contained herein without prior consent is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender by email or by telephone on +44 (0)191 384 4736 This email has been checked for viruses, however, we cannot accept any liability sustained as a result of software viruses and would recommend that you carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. ============================================================================================== |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |