OFBIZ-11415: Backport request - Using FlexibleStringExpander in form widget field's parameter names

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OFBIZ-11415: Backport request - Using FlexibleStringExpander in form widget field's parameter names

Daniel Watford
Hello,

I've created  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11415 as a
request to backport functionality introduced to trunk by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11330.

PR created: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/31

Thanks,

Dan.

--
Daniel Watford
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OFBIZ-11415: Backport request - Using FlexibleStringExpander in form widget field's parameter names

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi Daniel, All,

At https://markmail.org/message/ahu6kz7dihcyp45z you asked

    "How do committers decide which features to backport to 18.12?"

I (roughly) answered

     "The rule is normally we only backport bug fixes, obviously to avoid regression.  But if nobody disagree for simple new features or improvements
sometimes we backport"

I have decided I'll backport after the weekend OFBIZ-11415 & OFBIZ-11418 in at least R18 if nobody is against

As I said already, I'm also considering the related OFBIZ-4035 and will work on it next week, if nobody beats me on it...

Jacques

Le 25/02/2020 à 15:04, Daniel Watford a écrit :

> Hello,
>
> I've created  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11415 as a
> request to backport functionality introduced to trunk by
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11330.
>
> PR created: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/31
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan.
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OFBIZ-11415: Backport request - Using FlexibleStringExpander in form widget field's parameter names

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi Daniel,

Done, please check I did not miss anything. I was a bit confused because when I merged PR31 it seem PR37 was automatically merged too.

If all is OK I'll continue on OFBIZ-4035

Thanks

Jacques

Le 06/03/2020 à 18:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Hi Daniel, All,
>
> At https://markmail.org/message/ahu6kz7dihcyp45z you asked
>
>    "How do committers decide which features to backport to 18.12?"
>
> I (roughly) answered
>
>     "The rule is normally we only backport bug fixes, obviously to avoid regression.  But if nobody disagree for simple new features or improvements
> sometimes we backport"
>
> I have decided I'll backport after the weekend OFBIZ-11415 & OFBIZ-11418 in at least R18 if nobody is against
>
> As I said already, I'm also considering the related OFBIZ-4035 and will work on it next week, if nobody beats me on it...
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 25/02/2020 à 15:04, Daniel Watford a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've created  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11415 as a
>> request to backport functionality introduced to trunk by
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11330.
>>
>> PR created: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/31
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dan.
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OFBIZ-11415: Backport request - Using FlexibleStringExpander in form widget field's parameter names

Daniel Watford
Hi Jacques,

All looks good to me, thanks.

The branch used for PR37 was taken from PR31's branch, which means there
was some shared commits.

From the git log it looks like you merged PR37, which would explain why all
the commits from PR31 were merged as well.

Thanks,

Dan.

On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 13:32, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Done, please check I did not miss anything. I was a bit confused because
> when I merged PR31 it seem PR37 was automatically merged too.
>
> If all is OK I'll continue on OFBIZ-4035
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 06/03/2020 à 18:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > Hi Daniel, All,
> >
> > At https://markmail.org/message/ahu6kz7dihcyp45z you asked
> >
> >    "How do committers decide which features to backport to 18.12?"
> >
> > I (roughly) answered
> >
> >     "The rule is normally we only backport bug fixes, obviously to avoid
> regression.  But if nobody disagree for simple new features or improvements
> > sometimes we backport"
> >
> > I have decided I'll backport after the weekend OFBIZ-11415 & OFBIZ-11418
> in at least R18 if nobody is against
> >
> > As I said already, I'm also considering the related OFBIZ-4035 and will
> work on it next week, if nobody beats me on it...
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > Le 25/02/2020 à 15:04, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've created  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11415 as a
> >> request to backport functionality introduced to trunk by
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11330.
> >>
> >> PR created: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/31
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Dan.
> >>
>


--
Daniel Watford
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OFBIZ-11415: Backport request - Using FlexibleStringExpander in form widget field's parameter names

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Thanks Daniel,

I continue...

Jacques

Le 09/03/2020 à 16:04, Daniel Watford a écrit :

> Hi Jacques,
>
> All looks good to me, thanks.
>
> The branch used for PR37 was taken from PR31's branch, which means there
> was some shared commits.
>
> >From the git log it looks like you merged PR37, which would explain why all
> the commits from PR31 were merged as well.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan.
>
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 13:32, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Done, please check I did not miss anything. I was a bit confused because
>> when I merged PR31 it seem PR37 was automatically merged too.
>>
>> If all is OK I'll continue on OFBIZ-4035
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 06/03/2020 à 18:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>> Hi Daniel, All,
>>>
>>> At https://markmail.org/message/ahu6kz7dihcyp45z you asked
>>>
>>>     "How do committers decide which features to backport to 18.12?"
>>>
>>> I (roughly) answered
>>>
>>>      "The rule is normally we only backport bug fixes, obviously to avoid
>> regression.  But if nobody disagree for simple new features or improvements
>>> sometimes we backport"
>>>
>>> I have decided I'll backport after the weekend OFBIZ-11415 & OFBIZ-11418
>> in at least R18 if nobody is against
>>> As I said already, I'm also considering the related OFBIZ-4035 and will
>> work on it next week, if nobody beats me on it...
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 25/02/2020 à 15:04, Daniel Watford a écrit :
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I've created  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11415 as a
>>>> request to backport functionality introduced to trunk by
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11330.
>>>>
>>>> PR created: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/31
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Dan.
>>>>
>