OFBiz & CI & Analysis
Locked
 
|
Hi All,
Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run on the OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz code. This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz builds and how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the quality were lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down through the information faster and better to support our customers in a more efficient en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) every day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites are executed per component. If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to CI, please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation of the anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 CET, after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, please go to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still to be improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) still needs to be implemented. Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do supports our devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email directly to me. Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com |
Administrator
|
Hi Pierre,
Since you have it working locally maybe you could help on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 ? (disclaimer I did not re-read yet and don't remember clearly the situation) Jacques Le 07/07/2014 10:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : > Hi All, > > Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run on the > OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz code. > This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of > ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. > > *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* > We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz builds and > how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the quality were > lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down through the > information faster and better to support our customers in a more efficient > en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) every > day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites are > executed per component. > > If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to CI, > please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. > > *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* > We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation of the > anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better > understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 CET, > after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. > > If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, please go > to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. > > As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still to be > improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) still > needs to be implemented. > > Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do supports our > devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our > contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email directly > to me. > > Regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > -- |
|
|
Jacques,
I don't believe that we should pursue this kind of functionality anymore. While code analysis report generation with either cobertura or jacopo has its value, it should not be incorporated into the code base of OFBiz. It should be incorporated in the CI and code analysis environment. Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > Since you have it working locally maybe you could help on > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 ? (disclaimer I did not > re-read yet and don't remember clearly the situation) > > Jacques > > Le 07/07/2014 10:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : > >> Hi All, >> >> Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run on >> the >> OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz code. >> This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of >> ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. >> >> *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* >> >> We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz builds >> and >> how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the quality >> were >> lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down through the >> information faster and better to support our customers in a more efficient >> en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) every >> day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites are >> executed per component. >> >> If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to CI, >> please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. >> >> *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* >> >> We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation of the >> anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better >> understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 CET, >> after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. >> >> If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, please go >> to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. >> >> As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still to >> be >> improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) still >> needs to be implemented. >> >> Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do supports >> our >> devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our >> contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email directly >> to me. >> >> Regards, >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >> >> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >> Based Manufacturing, Professional >> Services and Retail & Trade >> http://www.orrtiz.com >> >> > -- > |
|
Hi Pierre,
I am interested in knowing the reason for your suggestion. On first impression it seems like you would spend a lot of time and effort setting up code analysis on each and every version of OFBiz. Even if you put say a parameterized build it would still need to be linked with each version. I also remember that a lot of my initial setup of jenkins builds and seeing the complexity which evolved slowly out of it made me pull all this logic out into ant build files which the CI server simply calls. Also isn't code analysis a sort of quality assurance exercise like unit tests which also ship with OFBiz codebase? I am trying to understand your reasoning to see if my builds need to be modified. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Jul 9, 2014 1:49 PM, "Pierre Smits" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Jacques, > > I don't believe that we should pursue this kind of functionality anymore. > While code analysis report generation with either cobertura or jacopo has > its value, it should not be incorporated into the code base of OFBiz. It > should be incorporated in the CI and code analysis environment. > > Regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi Pierre, > > > > Since you have it working locally maybe you could help on > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 ? (disclaimer I did not > > re-read yet and don't remember clearly the situation) > > > > Jacques > > > > Le 07/07/2014 10:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run on > >> the > >> OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz > code. > >> This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of > >> ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. > >> > >> *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* > >> > >> We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz builds > >> and > >> how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the quality > >> were > >> lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down through > the > >> information faster and better to support our customers in a more > efficient > >> en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) > every > >> day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites > are > >> executed per component. > >> > >> If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to CI, > >> please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. > >> > >> *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* > >> > >> We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation of > the > >> anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better > >> understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 CET, > >> after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. > >> > >> If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, please > go > >> to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. > >> > >> As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still to > >> be > >> improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) still > >> needs to be implemented. > >> > >> Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do supports > >> our > >> devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our > >> contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email > directly > >> to me. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Pierre Smits > >> > >> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > >> > >> Services & Solutions for Cloud- > >> Based Manufacturing, Professional > >> Services and Retail & Trade > >> http://www.orrtiz.com > >> > >> > > -- > > > |
|
Administrator
|
Le 10/07/2014 08:15, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > > I am interested in knowing the reason for your suggestion. On first > impression it seems like you would spend a lot of time and effort setting > up code analysis on each and every version of OFBiz. Even if you put say a > parameterized build it would still need to be linked with each version. I > also remember that a lot of my initial setup of jenkins builds and seeing > the complexity which evolved slowly out of it made me pull all this logic > out into ant build files which the CI server simply calls. I tend to do that also Jacques > > Also isn't code analysis a sort of quality assurance exercise like unit > tests which also ship with OFBiz codebase? I am trying to understand your > reasoning to see if my builds need to be modified. > > Regards, > > Taher Alkhateeb > On Jul 9, 2014 1:49 PM, "Pierre Smits" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Jacques, >> >> I don't believe that we should pursue this kind of functionality anymore. >> While code analysis report generation with either cobertura or jacopo has >> its value, it should not be incorporated into the code base of OFBiz. It >> should be incorporated in the CI and code analysis environment. >> >> Regards, >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >> Based Manufacturing, Professional >> Services and Retail & Trade >> http://www.orrtiz.com >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Pierre, >>> >>> Since you have it working locally maybe you could help on >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 ? (disclaimer I did not >>> re-read yet and don't remember clearly the situation) >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> Le 07/07/2014 10:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run on >>>> the >>>> OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz >> code. >>>> This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of >>>> ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. >>>> >>>> *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* >>>> >>>> We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz builds >>>> and >>>> how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the quality >>>> were >>>> lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down through >> the >>>> information faster and better to support our customers in a more >> efficient >>>> en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) >> every >>>> day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites >> are >>>> executed per component. >>>> >>>> If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to CI, >>>> please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. >>>> >>>> *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* >>>> >>>> We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation of >> the >>>> anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better >>>> understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 CET, >>>> after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. >>>> >>>> If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, please >> go >>>> to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. >>>> >>>> As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still to >>>> be >>>> improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) still >>>> needs to be implemented. >>>> >>>> Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do supports >>>> our >>>> devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our >>>> contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email >> directly >>>> to me. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre Smits >>>> >>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>> >>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> -- |
|
|
Taher, Jacques,
Can you share, in detail, how you have setup your CI & Code Analysis setup and/or what you do to get code analysis? Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > > Le 10/07/2014 08:15, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > > Hi Pierre, >> >> I am interested in knowing the reason for your suggestion. On first >> impression it seems like you would spend a lot of time and effort setting >> up code analysis on each and every version of OFBiz. Even if you put say a >> parameterized build it would still need to be linked with each version. I >> also remember that a lot of my initial setup of jenkins builds and seeing >> the complexity which evolved slowly out of it made me pull all this logic >> out into ant build files which the CI server simply calls. >> > > I tend to do that also > > Jacques > > > >> Also isn't code analysis a sort of quality assurance exercise like unit >> tests which also ship with OFBiz codebase? I am trying to understand your >> reasoning to see if my builds need to be modified. >> >> Regards, >> >> Taher Alkhateeb >> On Jul 9, 2014 1:49 PM, "Pierre Smits" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Jacques, >>> >>> I don't believe that we should pursue this kind of functionality anymore. >>> While code analysis report generation with either cobertura or jacopo has >>> its value, it should not be incorporated into the code base of OFBiz. It >>> should be incorporated in the CI and code analysis environment. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> >>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>> Services and Retail & Trade >>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Pierre, >>>> >>>> Since you have it working locally maybe you could help on >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 ? (disclaimer I did >>>> not >>>> re-read yet and don't remember clearly the situation) >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> Le 07/07/2014 10:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run on >>>>> the >>>>> OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz >>>>> >>>> code. >>> >>>> This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of >>>>> ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. >>>>> >>>>> *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* >>>>> >>>>> We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz builds >>>>> and >>>>> how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the quality >>>>> were >>>>> lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down through >>>>> >>>> the >>> >>>> information faster and better to support our customers in a more >>>>> >>>> efficient >>> >>>> en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) >>>>> >>>> every >>> >>>> day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites >>>>> >>>> are >>> >>>> executed per component. >>>>> >>>>> If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to >>>>> CI, >>>>> please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. >>>>> >>>>> *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* >>>>> >>>>> We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation of >>>>> >>>> the >>> >>>> anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better >>>>> understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 CET, >>>>> after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. >>>>> >>>>> If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, please >>>>> >>>> go >>> >>>> to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. >>>>> >>>>> As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still >>>>> to >>>>> be >>>>> improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) >>>>> still >>>>> needs to be implemented. >>>>> >>>>> Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do >>>>> supports >>>>> our >>>>> devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our >>>>> contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email >>>>> >>>> directly >>> >>>> to me. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>> >>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>>> >>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>>> > -- > |
|
Administrator
|
Hi Pierre,
For CI it's simply ant load-demo run-tests on each commit (being svn or git). No Selenium on current project: the UI is external to OFBiz. I don't do code analysis yet. If I had time I'd, most of the time not my decision... But I'd like to have it for OFBiz at the ASF, something official with OOTB code. BTW the infra Jira was about integrating in ASF Sonar https://analysis.apache.org/ I have not the time yet, but would really like to solve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 and it seems you got a way, hence my question. Jacques Le 10/07/2014 09:43, Pierre Smits a écrit : > Taher, Jacques, > > Can you share, in detail, how you have setup your CI & Code Analysis setup > and/or what you do to get code analysis? > > Regards, > > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Le 10/07/2014 08:15, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : >> >> Hi Pierre, >>> I am interested in knowing the reason for your suggestion. On first >>> impression it seems like you would spend a lot of time and effort setting >>> up code analysis on each and every version of OFBiz. Even if you put say a >>> parameterized build it would still need to be linked with each version. I >>> also remember that a lot of my initial setup of jenkins builds and seeing >>> the complexity which evolved slowly out of it made me pull all this logic >>> out into ant build files which the CI server simply calls. >>> >> I tend to do that also >> >> Jacques >> >> >> >>> Also isn't code analysis a sort of quality assurance exercise like unit >>> tests which also ship with OFBiz codebase? I am trying to understand your >>> reasoning to see if my builds need to be modified. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Taher Alkhateeb >>> On Jul 9, 2014 1:49 PM, "Pierre Smits" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Jacques, >>>> I don't believe that we should pursue this kind of functionality anymore. >>>> While code analysis report generation with either cobertura or jacopo has >>>> its value, it should not be incorporated into the code base of OFBiz. It >>>> should be incorporated in the CI and code analysis environment. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre Smits >>>> >>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Pierre, >>>>> Since you have it working locally maybe you could help on >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 ? (disclaimer I did >>>>> not >>>>> re-read yet and don't remember clearly the situation) >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> Le 07/07/2014 10:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run on >>>>>> the >>>>>> OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz >>>>>> >>>>> code. >>>>> This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of >>>>>> ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* >>>>>> >>>>>> We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz builds >>>>>> and >>>>>> how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the quality >>>>>> were >>>>>> lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down through >>>>>> >>>>> the >>>>> information faster and better to support our customers in a more >>>>> efficient >>>>> en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) >>>>> every >>>>> day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites >>>>> are >>>>> executed per component. >>>>>> If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to >>>>>> CI, >>>>>> please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* >>>>>> >>>>>> We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation of >>>>>> >>>>> the >>>>> anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better >>>>>> understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 CET, >>>>>> after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, please >>>>>> >>>>> go >>>>> to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. >>>>>> As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still >>>>>> to >>>>>> be >>>>>> improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) >>>>>> still >>>>>> needs to be implemented. >>>>>> >>>>>> Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do >>>>>> supports >>>>>> our >>>>>> devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our >>>>>> contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email >>>>>> >>>>> directly >>>>> to me. >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>>> >>>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>>>> >>>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> >> -- >> -- |
|
|
Jacques,
For sure I would like such service and support for OFBiz developers in the ASF Infrastructure as well. But as it isn't available at the time (see: http://www.apache.org/dev/service_unavailable.html?site=analysis.apache.org&code=502), we decided to open up both the build and analysis results up to other OFBiz developers as a contribution to the community. See the initial posting in this thread. With regard to the outage of the service, there is already a few issues logged in the INFRA JIRA. Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > For CI it's simply ant load-demo run-tests on each commit (being svn or > git). No Selenium on current project: the UI is external to OFBiz. > > I don't do code analysis yet. If I had time I'd, most of the time not my > decision... > But I'd like to have it for OFBiz at the ASF, something official with OOTB > code. > BTW the infra Jira was about integrating in ASF Sonar > https://analysis.apache.org/ > > I have not the time yet, but would really like to solve > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 and it seems you got a > way, hence my question. > > Jacques > > Le 10/07/2014 09:43, Pierre Smits a écrit : > >> Taher, Jacques, >> >> Can you share, in detail, how you have setup your CI & Code Analysis setup >> and/or what you do to get code analysis? >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >> Based Manufacturing, Professional >> Services and Retail & Trade >> http://www.orrtiz.com >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Le 10/07/2014 08:15, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : >>> >>> Hi Pierre, >>> >>>> I am interested in knowing the reason for your suggestion. On first >>>> impression it seems like you would spend a lot of time and effort >>>> setting >>>> up code analysis on each and every version of OFBiz. Even if you put >>>> say a >>>> parameterized build it would still need to be linked with each version. >>>> I >>>> also remember that a lot of my initial setup of jenkins builds and >>>> seeing >>>> the complexity which evolved slowly out of it made me pull all this >>>> logic >>>> out into ant build files which the CI server simply calls. >>>> >>>> I tend to do that also >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> Also isn't code analysis a sort of quality assurance exercise like unit >>>> tests which also ship with OFBiz codebase? I am trying to understand >>>> your >>>> reasoning to see if my builds need to be modified. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Taher Alkhateeb >>>> On Jul 9, 2014 1:49 PM, "Pierre Smits" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Jacques, >>>> >>>>> I don't believe that we should pursue this kind of functionality >>>>> anymore. >>>>> While code analysis report generation with either cobertura or jacopo >>>>> has >>>>> its value, it should not be incorporated into the code base of OFBiz. >>>>> It >>>>> should be incorporated in the CI and code analysis environment. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>> >>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Pierre, >>>>> >>>>>> Since you have it working locally maybe you could help on >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 ? (disclaimer I did >>>>>> not >>>>>> re-read yet and don't remember clearly the situation) >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 07/07/2014 10:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>>> Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run >>>>>>> on >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> code. >>>>>> This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of >>>>>> >>>>>>> ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz >>>>>>> builds >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the >>>>>>> quality >>>>>>> were >>>>>>> lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down >>>>>>> through >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the >>>>>> information faster and better to support our customers in a more >>>>>> efficient >>>>>> en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) >>>>>> every >>>>>> day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites >>>>>> are >>>>>> executed per component. >>>>>> >>>>>>> If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to >>>>>>> CI, >>>>>>> please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the >>>>>> anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better >>>>>> >>>>>>> understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 >>>>>>> CET, >>>>>>> after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, >>>>>>> please >>>>>>> >>>>>>> go >>>>>> to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. >>>>>> >>>>>>> As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) >>>>>>> still >>>>>>> needs to be implemented. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do >>>>>>> supports >>>>>>> our >>>>>>> devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our >>>>>>> contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email >>>>>>> >>>>>>> directly >>>>>> to me. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>>>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>> >>> > -- > |
|
Administrator
|
Ha, surprised, it was working when I sent you the message below
Mmm, are you sure, this works for me https://analysis.apache.org/ But it's quite slow, and I got the 502 also when willing to see Tomcat results, ok unreliable atm indeed Jacques Le 10/07/2014 11:18, Pierre Smits a écrit : > Jacques, > > For sure I would like such service and support for OFBiz developers in the > ASF Infrastructure as well. But as it isn't available at the time (see: > http://www.apache.org/dev/service_unavailable.html?site=analysis.apache.org&code=502), > we decided to open up both the build and analysis results up to other OFBiz > developers as a contribution to the community. See the initial posting in > this thread. > > With regard to the outage of the service, there is already a few issues > logged in the INFRA JIRA. > > Regards, > > > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Pierre, >> >> For CI it's simply ant load-demo run-tests on each commit (being svn or >> git). No Selenium on current project: the UI is external to OFBiz. >> >> I don't do code analysis yet. If I had time I'd, most of the time not my >> decision... >> But I'd like to have it for OFBiz at the ASF, something official with OOTB >> code. >> BTW the infra Jira was about integrating in ASF Sonar >> https://analysis.apache.org/ >> >> I have not the time yet, but would really like to solve >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 and it seems you got a >> way, hence my question. >> >> Jacques >> >> Le 10/07/2014 09:43, Pierre Smits a écrit : >> >>> Taher, Jacques, >>> >>> Can you share, in detail, how you have setup your CI & Code Analysis setup >>> and/or what you do to get code analysis? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> >>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>> Services and Retail & Trade >>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Le 10/07/2014 08:15, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : >>>> Hi Pierre, >>>> >>>>> I am interested in knowing the reason for your suggestion. On first >>>>> impression it seems like you would spend a lot of time and effort >>>>> setting >>>>> up code analysis on each and every version of OFBiz. Even if you put >>>>> say a >>>>> parameterized build it would still need to be linked with each version. >>>>> I >>>>> also remember that a lot of my initial setup of jenkins builds and >>>>> seeing >>>>> the complexity which evolved slowly out of it made me pull all this >>>>> logic >>>>> out into ant build files which the CI server simply calls. >>>>> >>>>> I tend to do that also >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Also isn't code analysis a sort of quality assurance exercise like unit >>>>> tests which also ship with OFBiz codebase? I am trying to understand >>>>> your >>>>> reasoning to see if my builds need to be modified. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Taher Alkhateeb >>>>> On Jul 9, 2014 1:49 PM, "Pierre Smits" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Jacques, >>>>> >>>>>> I don't believe that we should pursue this kind of functionality >>>>>> anymore. >>>>>> While code analysis report generation with either cobertura or jacopo >>>>>> has >>>>>> its value, it should not be incorporated into the code base of OFBiz. >>>>>> It >>>>>> should be incorporated in the CI and code analysis environment. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>>> >>>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Pierre, >>>>>> >>>>>>> Since you have it working locally maybe you could help on >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 ? (disclaimer I did >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> re-read yet and don't remember clearly the situation) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 07/07/2014 10:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Over the past weeks we have setup and tested an analysis tool to run >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> OFBiz code to get some more insights about the quality of the OFBiz >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> code. >>>>>>> This was a direct result of the request from the devops team(s) of >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ORRTIZ.COM to strengthen their support. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Building and testing OFBiz Trunk* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We already use a CI (for months now) to how a feel for how OFBiz >>>>>>>> builds >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> how the tests within the code performs, but insights about the >>>>>>>> quality >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> lacking. The new tool enables our devops team(s) to drill down >>>>>>>> through >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>> information faster and better to support our customers in a more >>>>>>> efficient >>>>>>> en effective way. Our CI pulls changes from the OFBiz SVN (commits) >>>>>>> every >>>>>>> day at 01:00 CET. We have setup our CI in such a way that test suites >>>>>>> are >>>>>>> executed per component. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you want to see how we support our devops team(s) with respect to >>>>>>>> CI, >>>>>>>> please go to http://dev.orrtiz.com/jenkins and have a look. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Analysing code in OFBiz Trunk* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We are now able to share the first evolution of our implementation >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>> anaysis tool with the community to help contributors to get a better >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> understanding of OFBiz. This analysis process runs daily at 07:00 >>>>>>>> CET, >>>>>>>> after the CI has build and tested the changes in OFBiz trunk. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you want to see the analysis results produced by our tools, >>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> go >>>>>>> to: http://dev.orrtiz.com/sonar and have a look. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As this is a first evolution, the quality of the information is still >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> improved. E.g., Java code coverage (e.g. with Cobertura or JaCoCo) >>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>> needs to be implemented. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Should you wish further information on how we at ORRTIZ.COM do >>>>>>>> supports >>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>> devops team(s), or have suggestions about how we can improve our >>>>>>>> contributions to the OFBiz community, feel free to send an email >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> directly >>>>>>> to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>>>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>>>>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>>>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>> >> -- >> -- |
«
Return to OFBiz - User
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |