Hi,
Thanks for your observations, but I don't really understand how you expect me to fix it. I regret that none of your comments are any help as the example page is not editable. I also note that even the sandbox page is slightly wider than the browser window resulting in a horizontal slider at the bottom of the screen. Poor HTML design again. I use a 1024 x 768 screen which is quite enough on a standard 17" screen. I must also say that this new wiki is not particularly user friendly. Yes, one can get used to it, but there is plenty of wiki software out there that is intuitive. Hey Ho, I'll struggle on, but all these hurdles are depressing. Everyone seems so defensive on this project I am finding it is difficult to contribute as I am getting to the point where I am not sure I dare to comment for fear of another lashing or negative response. Kind regards, Andrew Ballantine -----Original Message----- From: Tim Ruppert [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: 24 January 2007 14:30 To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Wiki issue I think the biggest reason that I would see is that some things wrap and are fine contextually - much of the time . . . command lines do not fall into this category. My recommendation on this one would be to get a shorter example, but wrapping can be a good way to go for sure. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Andrew Sykes wrote: Andrew, Tim, The diff line definitely seems to be the problem, perhaps it would be a good idea to have a best practise somewhere that asked for verbatim lines to be split when they were in danger of causing this kind of formatting problem, I see it too, and it definitely isn't too pretty! :-) e.g. $ start of line ~\ continuation ~\ even more... Is there any reason not to do this? - Andrew On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 07:01 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: Andrew, I'm guessing hte problem that you're having with this is caused by two things: 1. You have quite a small viewable space in your browser 2. the svn diff of ShipmentServices is a bit wider than you have going on. #1 we can't help you with :) - #2 is probably something more in the way Confluence handles verbatim text. In this particulart case, we would have a few options: 1. Make the example path shorter 2. See where & why Confluence handles these this way. I'm guessing that it's easier to do #1, but maybe someone know why verbatim-esque things are handle this way. I checked a bunch of other wiki formats and they ALL pretty much handle them in a similar manner because it's just following what the user asked - to display something exactly the way that they see it. Anyways, I hope this helps explain the mystery. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:37 AM, Andrew Ballantine wrote: Hi, I have noticed that quite a few of the wiki pages extend wider than the browser page. Is it not possible to set the wiki HTML so that it always proportions the content to the current size of the window? The reason for the request is that it quite difficult to read a long document with having to constantly shift the window from side to side. An example of this is: http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best +Practices I am using Firefox 2.0.0.1 on Windows2000 if that makes any difference. Internet V6 does the same. Kind regards, Andrew Ballantine. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.8/649 - Release Date: 23/01/2007 20:40 ***************************************************************** This email has been checked by the altohiway Mailcontroller Service ***************************************************************** -- Kind Regards Andrew Sykes <[hidden email]> Sykes Development Ltd http://www.sykesdevelopment.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.8/649 - Release Date: 23/01/2007 20:40 |
Andrew, I don't see how any of these responses to your Wiki message could have been viewed as anything but helpful? Please explain when you get a chance.
As for editing it, I believe this is just one of those very few pages that has restrictions as to who can edit it because it contains VERY important information that they don't want to risk being modified by spammers, etc. My recommendations would be the following: 1. Up your resolution. My 15" laptop browser has a resolution of 1440x900 2. Try Jacques suggestion and make your font size smaller in your window 3. Submit a JIRA issue asking for the example to be changed. 4. any others Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:10 AM, Andrew Ballantine wrote:
smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Andrew Ballantine
Andrew,
From: "Andrew Ballantine" <[hidden email]> > Hi, > Thanks for your observations, but I don't really understand how you expect > me to fix it. > I regret that none of your comments are any help as the example page is not > editable. Did you try them ? > I also note that even the sandbox page is slightly wider than the browser > window resulting in a horizontal slider at the bottom of the screen. Poor > HTML design again. A way to help to resolve this problem would be to explain the problem to Attlassian (Confluence editor). This link might help http://confluence.atlassian.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=12 > I use a 1024 x 768 screen which is quite enough on a standard 17" screen. > > I must also say that this new wiki is not particularly user friendly. Yes, > one can get used to it, but there is plenty of wiki software out there that > is intuitive. Hey Ho, I'll struggle on, but all these hurdles are > depressing. Do you know one that allow to set permissions by document ? This one of the main reason of Conflucence choice. You may find more in Nabble : http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?local=y&forum=2740&query=Confluence > Everyone seems so defensive on this project I am finding it is difficult to > contribute as I am getting to the point where I am not sure I dare to > comment for fear of another lashing or negative response. Don't be shy ;o) We are here to help ! If nobody was never complaining that would not be anymore democracy. Jacques > > Kind regards, > > Andrew Ballantine > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Ruppert [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: 24 January 2007 14:30 > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Wiki issue > > > I think the biggest reason that I would see is that some things wrap and > are fine contextually - much of the time . . . command lines do not fall > into this category. My recommendation on this one would be to get a shorter > example, but wrapping can be a good way to go for sure. > > > Cheers, > Tim > > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > > > > On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Andrew Sykes wrote: > > > Andrew, Tim, > > > The diff line definitely seems to be the problem, perhaps it would be a > good idea to have a best practise somewhere that asked for verbatim > lines to be split when they were in danger of causing this kind of > formatting problem, I see it too, and it definitely isn't too > pretty! :-) > > > e.g. > $ start of line > ~\ continuation > ~\ even more... > > > Is there any reason not to do this? > > > - Andrew > > > > > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 07:01 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: > Andrew, I'm guessing hte problem that you're having with this is > caused by two things: > > > > > 1. You have quite a small viewable space in your browser > 2. the svn diff of ShipmentServices is a bit wider than you have going > on. > > > > > #1 we can't help you with :) - #2 is probably something more in the > way Confluence handles verbatim text. In this particulart case, we > would have a few options: > > > > > 1. Make the example path shorter > 2. See where & why Confluence handles these this way. > > > > > I'm guessing that it's easier to do #1, but maybe someone know why > verbatim-esque things are handle this way. I checked a bunch of other > wiki formats and they ALL pretty much handle them in a similar manner > because it's just following what the user asked - to display something > exactly the way that they see it. > > > > > Anyways, I hope this helps explain the mystery. > > > > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > > > > > > On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:37 AM, Andrew Ballantine wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > I have noticed that quite a few of the wiki pages extend wider than > the > browser page. > > > > > Is it not possible to set the wiki HTML so that it always > proportions the > content to the current size of the window? > > > > > The reason for the request is that it quite difficult to read a long > document with having to constantly shift the window from side to > side. > > > > > An example of this is: > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best > +Practices > > > > > I am using Firefox 2.0.0.1 on Windows2000 if that makes any > difference. > Internet V6 does the same. > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Andrew Ballantine. > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.8/649 - Release Date: > 23/01/2007 > 20:40 > > > > > > > > > > > > > ***************************************************************** > This email has been checked by the altohiway Mailcontroller Service > ***************************************************************** > > > > > -- > Kind Regards > Andrew Sykes <[hidden email]> > Sykes Development Ltd > http://www.sykesdevelopment.com > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.8/649 - Release Date: 23/01/2007 > 20:40 > |
In reply to this post by Tim Ruppert
Tim,
>Andrew, I don't see how any of these responses to your Wiki message could > have been viewed as anything but helpful? Please explain when you get a >chance. I read your response as a diagnosis which I didn't fully understand and am not in a position to implement because the page is read only. So I cannot fix the problem on that page at the wiki level. >As for editing it, I believe this is just one of those very few pages that >has restrictions as to who can edit it because it contains VERY important >information that they don't want to risk being modified by spammers, etc. Agreed. However the problem is with Confluence. The rendering of the page is down to their software. I am simply the poor mug who is reporting a User Interface problem that makes it difficult for me and, presumably, others to read this VERY important information. >My recommendations would be the following: >1. Up your resolution. My 15" laptop browser has a resolution of 1440x900 My maximum resolution is 1024 x 768 >2. Try Jacques suggestion and make your font size smaller in your window I can just about read it at that size, but it will cause eye stain and is just a workaround. The width of the browser display should not grow when the text size is changed. As I said HTML problem that only Confluence can fix. >3. Submit a JIRA issue asking for the example to be changed. Will do, but I get the feeling nothing will get done. >4. any others Not sure what you mean by 4. Kind regards, Andrew Ballantine. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.8/649 - Release Date: 23/01/2007 20:40 ***************************************************************** This email has been checked by the altohiway Mailcontroller Service ***************************************************************** |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |