Hi everybody,
I'm working with OFBiz for over 2 months, read many books and I have a problem with the setup process, which can't be completed. (ends with stack trace) I find the same error in the official Apache virtual machine. (by pressing the button "SET TO COMPLETE") Under the following link: https://ofbiz-vm2.apache.org:8443/ofbizsetup/control/OrganizationToComplete Can anyone help me to fix this? I work with version 13.07. Which version do you recommend? Best regards, Tom Truks |
Administrator
|
Hi Tom,
First thing to be sure about you *must* not load the demo data, only the seed and seed-initial. Run "ant -p" at OFBiz root if you don't know how to do that. That's why it can't work on demos: we load, err, demo data there ;) Thanks for your interest in OFBiz, don't give up Jacques Le 06/10/2016 à 08:14, Tom Truks a écrit : > Hi everybody, > I'm working with OFBiz for over 2 months, read many books and I have a problem with the setup process, which can't be completed. (ends with stack > trace) > I find the same error in the official Apache virtual machine. (by pressing the button "SET TO COMPLETE") > Under the following link: https://ofbiz-vm2.apache.org:8443/ofbizsetup/control/OrganizationToComplete > > Can anyone help me to fix this? I work with version 13.07. Which version do you recommend? > > Best regards, > Tom Truks > |
Hi Jacques,
OFBiz is alreadyrunningwithoutdemo data. I started it with: "ant load-extseed && ant create-admin-user-login -DuserLoginId=admin && ant start" Best regards, Tom Am 06.10.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > Hi Tom, > > First thing to be sure about you *must* not load the demo data, only > the seed and seed-initial. Run "ant -p" at OFBiz root if you don't > know how to do that. > > That's why it can't work on demos: we load, err, demo data there ;) > > Thanks for your interest in OFBiz, don't give up > > Jacques > > > Le 06/10/2016 à 08:14, Tom Truks a écrit : >> Hi everybody, >> I'm working with OFBiz for over 2 months, read many books and I have >> a problem with the setup process, which can't be completed. (ends >> with stack trace) >> I find the same error in the official Apache virtual machine. (by >> pressing the button "SET TO COMPLETE") >> Under the following link: >> https://ofbiz-vm2.apache.org:8443/ofbizsetup/control/OrganizationToComplete >> >> Can anyone help me to fix this? I work with version 13.07. Which >> version do you recommend? >> >> Best regards, >> Tom Truks >> > |
Administrator
|
Good, then I have no ideas and you should create a Jira and attach your stack trace
If you don't know how it works you might read https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the rest. Else maybe we should remove it... Thanks Jacques Le 06/10/2016 à 13:04, Tom Truks a écrit : > Hi Jacques, > > OFBiz is alreadyrunningwithoutdemo data. I started it with: > > "ant load-extseed && ant create-admin-user-login -DuserLoginId=admin && ant start" > > Best regards, > > Tom > > > > Am 06.10.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >> Hi Tom, >> >> First thing to be sure about you *must* not load the demo data, only the seed and seed-initial. Run "ant -p" at OFBiz root if you don't know how to >> do that. >> >> That's why it can't work on demos: we load, err, demo data there ;) >> >> Thanks for your interest in OFBiz, don't give up >> >> Jacques >> >> >> Le 06/10/2016 à 08:14, Tom Truks a écrit : >>> Hi everybody, >>> I'm working with OFBiz for over 2 months, read many books and I have a problem with the setup process, which can't be completed. (ends with stack >>> trace) >>> I find the same error in the official Apache virtual machine. (by pressing the button "SET TO COMPLETE") >>> Under the following link: https://ofbiz-vm2.apache.org:8443/ofbizsetup/control/OrganizationToComplete >>> >>> Can anyone help me to fix this? I work with version 13.07. Which version do you recommend? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Tom Truks >>> >> > > |
I confirm that the issue exists also on 15.12.
Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Good, then I have no ideas and you should create a Jira and attach your > stack trace > > If you don't know how it works you might read > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+ > Contributors+Best+Practices > > I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the > rest. Else maybe we should remove it... > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > > Le 06/10/2016 à 13:04, Tom Truks a écrit : > >> Hi Jacques, >> >> OFBiz is alreadyrunningwithoutdemo data. I started it with: >> >> "ant load-extseed && ant create-admin-user-login -DuserLoginId=admin && >> ant start" >> >> Best regards, >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> Am 06.10.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >> >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> First thing to be sure about you *must* not load the demo data, only the >>> seed and seed-initial. Run "ant -p" at OFBiz root if you don't know how to >>> do that. >>> >>> That's why it can't work on demos: we load, err, demo data there ;) >>> >>> Thanks for your interest in OFBiz, don't give up >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Le 06/10/2016 à 08:14, Tom Truks a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> I'm working with OFBiz for over 2 months, read many books and I have a >>>> problem with the setup process, which can't be completed. (ends with stack >>>> trace) >>>> I find the same error in the official Apache virtual machine. (by >>>> pressing the button "SET TO COMPLETE") >>>> Under the following link: https://ofbiz-vm2.apache.org:8 >>>> 443/ofbizsetup/control/OrganizationToComplete >>>> >>>> Can anyone help me to fix this? I work with version 13.07. Which >>>> version do you recommend? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Tom Truks >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > |
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
> I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the
rest. Else maybe we should remove it... Jacques I think you've been around long enough to know that a committer's responsibility to a contribution doesn't extend to years of support. If I found a bug in your tarpit/ProtectedView code I wouldn't suddenly expect you to fix it nor would I threaten to remove it. Regards Scott On 7 October 2016 at 08:07, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > Good, then I have no ideas and you should create a Jira and attach your > stack trace > > If you don't know how it works you might read > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+ > Contributors+Best+Practices > > I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the > rest. Else maybe we should remove it... > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > > Le 06/10/2016 à 13:04, Tom Truks a écrit : > >> Hi Jacques, >> >> OFBiz is alreadyrunningwithoutdemo data. I started it with: >> >> "ant load-extseed && ant create-admin-user-login -DuserLoginId=admin && >> ant start" >> >> Best regards, >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> Am 06.10.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >> >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> First thing to be sure about you *must* not load the demo data, only the >>> seed and seed-initial. Run "ant -p" at OFBiz root if you don't know how to >>> do that. >>> >>> That's why it can't work on demos: we load, err, demo data there ;) >>> >>> Thanks for your interest in OFBiz, don't give up >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Le 06/10/2016 à 08:14, Tom Truks a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> I'm working with OFBiz for over 2 months, read many books and I have a >>>> problem with the setup process, which can't be completed. (ends with stack >>>> trace) >>>> I find the same error in the official Apache virtual machine. (by >>>> pressing the button "SET TO COMPLETE") >>>> Under the following link: https://ofbiz-vm2.apache.org:8 >>>> 443/ofbizsetup/control/OrganizationToComplete >>>> >>>> Can anyone help me to fix this? I work with version 13.07. Which >>>> version do you recommend? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Tom Truks >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > |
Administrator
|
Le 11/10/2016 à 23:59, Scott Gray a écrit :
>> I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the > rest. Else maybe we should remove it... > > Jacques I think you've been around long enough to know that a committer's > responsibility to a contribution doesn't extend to years of support. If I > found a bug in your tarpit/ProtectedView code I wouldn't suddenly expect > you to fix it nor would I threaten to remove it. > > Regards > Scott Scott, It was only a proposition, not even sure there is a bug. I see no Jira and I did not check. Funny that you evoke the tarpit/ProtectedView code, would you secretly want me to remove it? :) Jacques |
It was an unreasonable proposition and I think you know that.
I've never looked at the tarpit code to be honest, it was just the first example of an old contribution from you that came to mind. Regards Scott On 12/10/2016 19:13, "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Le 11/10/2016 à 23:59, Scott Gray a écrit : > >> I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the >>> >> rest. Else maybe we should remove it... >> >> Jacques I think you've been around long enough to know that a committer's >> responsibility to a contribution doesn't extend to years of support. If I >> found a bug in your tarpit/ProtectedView code I wouldn't suddenly expect >> you to fix it nor would I threaten to remove it. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> > > Scott, > > It was only a proposition, not even sure there is a bug. I see no Jira and > I did not check. Funny that you evoke the tarpit/ProtectedView code, would > you secretly want me to remove it? :) > > Jacques > > |
If that feature is broken and no one is maintaining it, I would suggest to
remove it to avoid confusion on users. Jacopo On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Scott Gray <[hidden email]> wrote: > It was an unreasonable proposition and I think you know that. > > I've never looked at the tarpit code to be honest, it was just the first > example of an old contribution from you that came to mind. > > Regards > Scott > > On 12/10/2016 19:13, "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Le 11/10/2016 à 23:59, Scott Gray a écrit : > > > >> I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the > >>> > >> rest. Else maybe we should remove it... > >> > >> Jacques I think you've been around long enough to know that a > committer's > >> responsibility to a contribution doesn't extend to years of support. > If I > >> found a bug in your tarpit/ProtectedView code I wouldn't suddenly expect > >> you to fix it nor would I threaten to remove it. > >> > >> Regards > >> Scott > >> > > > > Scott, > > > > It was only a proposition, not even sure there is a bug. I see no Jira > and > > I did not check. Funny that you evoke the tarpit/ProtectedView code, > would > > you secretly want me to remove it? :) > > > > Jacques > > > > > |
Administrator
|
The problem is we don't know if it's really broken.
We also don't know if users are really using it, and even who really cares... Jacques Le 12/10/2016 à 11:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > If that feature is broken and no one is maintaining it, I would suggest to > remove it to avoid confusion on users. > > Jacopo > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Scott Gray <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> It was an unreasonable proposition and I think you know that. >> >> I've never looked at the tarpit code to be honest, it was just the first >> example of an old contribution from you that came to mind. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 12/10/2016 19:13, "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >>> Le 11/10/2016 à 23:59, Scott Gray a écrit : >>> >>>> I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the >>>> rest. Else maybe we should remove it... >>>> >>>> Jacques I think you've been around long enough to know that a >> committer's >>>> responsibility to a contribution doesn't extend to years of support. >> If I >>>> found a bug in your tarpit/ProtectedView code I wouldn't suddenly expect >>>> you to fix it nor would I threaten to remove it. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>> Scott, >>> >>> It was only a proposition, not even sure there is a bug. I see no Jira >> and >>> I did not check. Funny that you evoke the tarpit/ProtectedView code, >> would >>> you secretly want me to remove it? :) >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> |
It has never worked for me, even since the 11.x days.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > The problem is we don't know if it's really broken. > > We also don't know if users are really using it, and even who really > cares... > > Jacques > > > > Le 12/10/2016 à 11:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> If that feature is broken and no one is maintaining it, I would suggest to >> remove it to avoid confusion on users. >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Scott Gray < >> [hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> It was an unreasonable proposition and I think you know that. >>> >>> I've never looked at the tarpit code to be honest, it was just the first >>> example of an old contribution from you that came to mind. >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> On 12/10/2016 19:13, "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Le 11/10/2016 à 23:59, Scott Gray a écrit : >>>> >>>> I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the >>>>> rest. Else maybe we should remove it... >>>>> >>>>> Jacques I think you've been around long enough to know that a >>>>> >>>> committer's >>> >>>> responsibility to a contribution doesn't extend to years of support. >>>>> >>>> If I >>> >>>> found a bug in your tarpit/ProtectedView code I wouldn't suddenly expect >>>>> you to fix it nor would I threaten to remove it. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> Scott, >>>> >>>> It was only a proposition, not even sure there is a bug. I see no Jira >>>> >>> and >>> >>>> I did not check. Funny that you evoke the tarpit/ProtectedView code, >>>> >>> would >>> >>>> you secretly want me to remove it? :) >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> > |
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote: > The problem is we don't know if it's really broken. > > We also don't know if users are really using it, and even who really > cares... > > Jacques For me a simple rule of thumb is: if the code is broken/incomplete since a long time and no one is reporting bugs and providing patches then the feature is not used and/or maintained and should be dropped. Jacopo |
I confirm it doesn't work for me since 12.04. It always shoots annoying
error messages. +1 to removing it On Oct 12, 2016 7:07 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < [hidden email]> wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > The problem is we don't know if it's really broken. > > We also don't know if users are really using it, and even who really > cares... > > Jacques For me a simple rule of thumb is: if the code is broken/incomplete since a long time and no one is reporting bugs and providing patches then the feature is not used and/or maintained and should be dropped. Jacopo |
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-5
Easy for you to say because you are an expert. What about a complete
beginner who is trying to setup a new system. I have never really known (for sure) if my system was setup properly because of this error. Errors spewing in the logs promotes a lack of confidence in the product. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > The problem is we don't know if it's really broken. > > > > We also don't know if users are really using it, and even who really > > cares... > > > > Jacques > > > For me a simple rule of thumb is: if the code is broken/incomplete since a > long time and no one is reporting bugs and providing patches then the > feature is not used and/or maintained and should be dropped. > > Jacopo > |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Mike <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Easy for you to say because you are an expert. What about a complete > beginner who is trying to setup a new system. I have never really known > (for sure) if my system was setup properly because of this error. Errors > spewing in the logs promotes a lack of confidence in the product. I agree with you Mike: a tool/feature that is available but incomplete or broken cause confusion and lack of confidence. Jacopo |
The reason why this is happening is because there is no check on whether
the party setup already exists. The function calls the setupDefaultGeneralLedger service, which leads to the creation of the PartyAcctgPreference record. This shouldn't be called when the first record already exists. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Mike <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Easy for you to say because you are an expert. What about a complete > > beginner who is trying to setup a new system. I have never really known > > (for sure) if my system was setup properly because of this error. Errors > > spewing in the logs promotes a lack of confidence in the product. > > > I agree with you Mike: a tool/feature that is available but incomplete or > broken cause confusion and lack of confidence. > > Jacopo > |
Administrator
|
That's interesting Pierre thanks. Could someone sufficiently interested please create a Jira?
Jacques Le 12/10/2016 à 19:52, Pierre Smits a écrit : > The reason why this is happening is because there is no check on whether > the party setup already exists. The function calls the > setupDefaultGeneralLedger service, which leads to the creation of the > PartyAcctgPreference record. This shouldn't be called when the first record > already exists. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Mike <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Easy for you to say because you are an expert. What about a complete >>> beginner who is trying to setup a new system. I have never really known >>> (for sure) if my system was setup properly because of this error. Errors >>> spewing in the logs promotes a lack of confidence in the product. >> >> I agree with you Mike: a tool/feature that is available but incomplete or >> broken cause confusion and lack of confidence. >> >> Jacopo >> |
As pierre already wrote, the setup will only properly work when loading
only seed and seed initial data and then, only then, it will appear on the menu.Yes, the PartyAcctgPreference entity should be empty. We have now a simplified one page setup version in the GrowERP backend which you can use. It should be compatible with OFBiz because GrowERP is following the OFBiz data model and has the same Apache license. Installation of GrowERP at https://www.growerp.com/control/main?contentId=GROWERP_DEMO The reason that we did not contribute it is, that it takes currently too much discussion and time to get enhancements in the core ofbiz system. We will try a new upcoming enhancement to make the passport component also suitable for facebook and google+ hopefully it will get better. Regards, Hans On 13/10/16 02:12, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > That's interesting Pierre thanks. Could someone sufficiently interested > please create a Jira? > > Jacques > > > Le 12/10/2016 à 19:52, Pierre Smits a écrit : >> The reason why this is happening is because there is no check on whether >> the party setup already exists. The function calls the >> setupDefaultGeneralLedger service, which leads to the creation of the >> PartyAcctgPreference record. This shouldn't be called when the first >> record >> already exists. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> >> OFBiz based solutions & services >> >> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace >> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Mike <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Easy for you to say because you are an expert. What about a complete >>>> beginner who is trying to setup a new system. I have never really >>>> known >>>> (for sure) if my system was setup properly because of this error. >>>> Errors >>>> spewing in the logs promotes a lack of confidence in the product. >>> >>> I agree with you Mike: a tool/feature that is available but >>> incomplete or >>> broken cause confusion and lack of confidence. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> > -- Regards, Hans Bakker CEO, http://antwebsystems.com |
OFBiz is dead. Never before have I seen such poor software! GrowERP is
my last try to find a software that works for my work. Am 13.10.2016 um 03:04 schrieb Hans Bakker: > As pierre already wrote, the setup will only properly work when > loading only seed and seed initial data and then, only then, it will > appear on the menu.Yes, the PartyAcctgPreference entity should be empty. > > We have now a simplified one page setup version in the GrowERP backend > which you can use. It should be compatible with OFBiz because GrowERP > is following the OFBiz data model and has the same Apache license. > > Installation of GrowERP at > https://www.growerp.com/control/main?contentId=GROWERP_DEMO > > The reason that we did not contribute it is, that it takes currently > too much discussion and time to get enhancements in the core ofbiz > system. > > We will try a new upcoming enhancement to make the passport component > also suitable for facebook and google+ hopefully it will get better. > > Regards, > Hans > > On 13/10/16 02:12, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> That's interesting Pierre thanks. Could someone sufficiently interested >> please create a Jira? >> >> Jacques >> >> >> Le 12/10/2016 à 19:52, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>> The reason why this is happening is because there is no check on >>> whether >>> the party setup already exists. The function calls the >>> setupDefaultGeneralLedger service, which leads to the creation of the >>> PartyAcctgPreference record. This shouldn't be called when the first >>> record >>> already exists. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> >>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>> >>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace >>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Mike <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Easy for you to say because you are an expert. What about a complete >>>>> beginner who is trying to setup a new system. I have never really >>>>> known >>>>> (for sure) if my system was setup properly because of this error. >>>>> Errors >>>>> spewing in the logs promotes a lack of confidence in the product. >>>> >>>> I agree with you Mike: a tool/feature that is available but >>>> incomplete or >>>> broken cause confusion and lack of confidence. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >> > |
Emotional outbursts aside, I would say understanding the data loading
process would be very sufficient for a clean system setup and is in fact better than a setup application. The README.md provides good examples. As for the "OFBiz is dead" statement go ahead and take a look at the commit log to get an idea of the activity level in this project. Suffice to say it is one of the highest in Apache. On Oct 14, 2016 3:55 PM, "Tom Truks" <[hidden email]> wrote: OFBiz is dead. Never before have I seen such poor software! GrowERP is my last try to find a software that works for my work. Am 13.10.2016 um 03:04 schrieb Hans Bakker: > As pierre already wrote, the setup will only properly work when loading > only seed and seed initial data and then, only then, it will appear on the > menu.Yes, the PartyAcctgPreference entity should be empty. > > We have now a simplified one page setup version in the GrowERP backend > which you can use. It should be compatible with OFBiz because GrowERP is > following the OFBiz data model and has the same Apache license. > > Installation of GrowERP at https://www.growerp.com/contro > l/main?contentId=GROWERP_DEMO > > The reason that we did not contribute it is, that it takes currently too > much discussion and time to get enhancements in the core ofbiz system. > > We will try a new upcoming enhancement to make the passport component also > suitable for facebook and google+ hopefully it will get better. > > Regards, > Hans > > On 13/10/16 02:12, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> That's interesting Pierre thanks. Could someone sufficiently interested >> please create a Jira? >> >> Jacques >> >> >> Le 12/10/2016 à 19:52, Pierre Smits a écrit : >> >>> The reason why this is happening is because there is no check on whether >>> the party setup already exists. The function calls the >>> setupDefaultGeneralLedger service, which leads to the creation of the >>> PartyAcctgPreference record. This shouldn't be called when the first >>> record >>> already exists. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> >>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>> >>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace >>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Mike <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Easy for you to say because you are an expert. What about a complete >>>>> beginner who is trying to setup a new system. I have never really >>>>> known >>>>> (for sure) if my system was setup properly because of this error. >>>>> Errors >>>>> spewing in the logs promotes a lack of confidence in the product. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I agree with you Mike: a tool/feature that is available but >>>> incomplete or >>>> broken cause confusion and lack of confidence. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |