> Given that it might be a useful improvement to the feature set of OFBiz it
> is worth a JIRA of the type wish/improvement. You decide.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <
http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
>
http://www.orrtiz.com>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > That could maybe be useful to others if it's documented in at least the
> > data model (description of the field and its reason to be)
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > Le 16/01/2015 14:40, Christian Carlow a écrit :
> >
> > Hey Jacques,
> >>
> >> Sorry, it was late when asked. I'm referring to cases when a customer
> >> submits an order they create offline with their own order, item, and
> >> item schedule names.
> >>
> >> For example, a company might submit an order named "po1" for an item
> >> with 3 schedules named "0801", "0802", "0803". The customer expects the
> >> schedule names to appear for each shipment for their own internal
> >> tracking. In this case the orderItemSeqId and shipGroupSeqId are
> >> inadequate for representing the item schedule to them.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:27 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>
> >>> Could you please elaborate what exactly is <<track customers-assign
> >>> order item schedule names>>?
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> Le 16/01/2015 05:18, Christian Carlow a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> Is adding a field like OrderItemShipGroupAssoc.lineName to track
> >>>> customers-assign order item schedule names worth a JIRA?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
Locked
