PartyRelationshipType OWNER vs OWNERSHIP

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi,

As we use PARTNERSHIP, it seems to me that we should better use OWNERSHIP as partyRelationshipTypeId below
    <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Partner"
partyRelationshipTypeId="PARTNERSHIP" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
    <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Owned by"
partyRelationshipTypeId="OWNER" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
As it's not a big deal (but would makes things clearer) I wonder if it's worth to change it since certainly some OFBiz users are
using OWNER

Opinions?

Jacques

[David E. Jones-2]

If this seed data is already being used it would be best to not change it.

If you do change it, anyone using it would need to do a data migration.

-David


On Dec 26, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As we use PARTNERSHIP, it seems to me that we should better use OWNERSHIP as partyRelationshipTypeId below
>   <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Partner" partyRelationshipTypeId="PARTNERSHIP" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
>   <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Owned by" partyRelationshipTypeId="OWNER" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
> As it's not a big deal (but would makes things clearer) I wonder if it's worth to change it since certainly some OFBiz users are using OWNER
>
> Opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Yes, it's easier (and safer) to let it as is. It's ok with me

From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>

>
> If this seed data is already being used it would be best to not change it.
>
> If you do change it, anyone using it would need to do a data migration.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Dec 26, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we use PARTNERSHIP, it seems to me that we should better use OWNERSHIP as partyRelationshipTypeId below
>>   <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Partner"
>> partyRelationshipTypeId="PARTNERSHIP" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
>>   <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Owned by"
>> partyRelationshipTypeId="OWNER" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
>> As it's not a big deal (but would makes things clearer) I wonder if it's worth to change it since certainly some OFBiz users are
>> using OWNER
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>