Preliminary question about themes before possible votes

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Preliminary question about themes before possible votes

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi All,

At OFBIZ-8293 we began to informally discuss about reducing the number of OOTB themes. But we could clearly agree and believe a vote is better/

 1. Now the 1st question which has been already discussed several time without a clear decision in this ML:
    do we, as a community, want to reduce the number  of themes?
    Should we vote on that before starting votes on or a lazy consensus could apply.
    I suggest that we try a lazy consensus and if nobody is against with strong argument we move on.
 2. Should we vote on the number of themes to keep?
    Again I suggest a lazy consensus ratehr than a vote
 3. The theme/s to remove, I think we should make several votes, one by theme, to clearly decide which theme/s to remove

Thanks for your help deciding on this, please try to keep focused :)

Jacques



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Preliminary question about themes before possible votes

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Ah something I missed to precise: it's not about giving arguments, pro or cons. It's only about taking decisions, so again: please stay focused.

Thanks

Jacques


Le 21/09/2016 à 18:13, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Hi All,
>
> At OFBIZ-8293 we began to informally discuss about reducing the number of OOTB themes. But we could clearly agree and believe a vote is better/
>
> 1. Now the 1st question which has been already discussed several time without a clear decision in this ML:
>    do we, as a community, want to reduce the number  of themes?
>    Should we vote on that before starting votes on or a lazy consensus could apply.
>    I suggest that we try a lazy consensus and if nobody is against with strong argument we move on.
> 2. Should we vote on the number of themes to keep?
>    Again I suggest a lazy consensus ratehr than a vote
> 3. The theme/s to remove, I think we should make several votes, one by theme, to clearly decide which theme/s to remove
>
> Thanks for your help deciding on this, please try to keep focused :)
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Preliminary question about themes before possible votes

Julien NICOLAS
Hi Jacques,

I agree that it's important to remove themes from the framework (keep at
least one is important ^^ ).

But you don't mention what's happening with theme that is not in the
OOTB. I think it could be available from public repository instead of
simply deleted.

For me pors is to stop to maintain outdated theme that is never used. We
can focus on one theme and go further to upgrade the theme management
(and rendering management).

Julien.

On 21/09/2016 18:35, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Ah something I missed to precise: it's not about giving arguments, pro
> or cons. It's only about taking decisions, so again: please stay focused.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 21/09/2016 à 18:13, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> At OFBIZ-8293 we began to informally discuss about reducing the
>> number of OOTB themes. But we could clearly agree and believe a vote
>> is better/
>>
>> 1. Now the 1st question which has been already discussed several time
>> without a clear decision in this ML:
>>    do we, as a community, want to reduce the number  of themes?
>>    Should we vote on that before starting votes on or a lazy
>> consensus could apply.
>>    I suggest that we try a lazy consensus and if nobody is against
>> with strong argument we move on.
>> 2. Should we vote on the number of themes to keep?
>>    Again I suggest a lazy consensus ratehr than a vote
>> 3. The theme/s to remove, I think we should make several votes, one
>> by theme, to clearly decide which theme/s to remove
>>
>> Thanks for your help deciding on this, please try to keep focused :)
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Preliminary question about themes before possible votes

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hi Julien,

We spoke about having themes like plugins, but I think it was just a small talk so far

In 1st place they should go in attic (ie stay in OFBiz trunk in svn repo ) and then possibly resurrected from there as themes-plugins, or not.

Jacques


Le 21/09/2016 à 22:59, Julien NICOLAS a écrit :

> Hi Jacques,
>
> I agree that it's important to remove themes from the framework (keep at least one is important ^^ ).
>
> But you don't mention what's happening with theme that is not in the OOTB. I think it could be available from public repository instead of simply
> deleted.
>
> For me pors is to stop to maintain outdated theme that is never used. We can focus on one theme and go further to upgrade the theme management (and
> rendering management).
>
> Julien.
>
> On 21/09/2016 18:35, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Ah something I missed to precise: it's not about giving arguments, pro or cons. It's only about taking decisions, so again: please stay focused.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 21/09/2016 à 18:13, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> At OFBIZ-8293 we began to informally discuss about reducing the number of OOTB themes. But we could clearly agree and believe a vote is better/
>>>
>>> 1. Now the 1st question which has been already discussed several time without a clear decision in this ML:
>>>    do we, as a community, want to reduce the number  of themes?
>>>    Should we vote on that before starting votes on or a lazy consensus could apply.
>>>    I suggest that we try a lazy consensus and if nobody is against with strong argument we move on.
>>> 2. Should we vote on the number of themes to keep?
>>>    Again I suggest a lazy consensus ratehr than a vote
>>> 3. The theme/s to remove, I think we should make several votes, one by theme, to clearly decide which theme/s to remove
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help deciding on this, please try to keep focused :)
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>