Product Type That Won't Pick Inventory and Creates One Invoice

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Product Type That Won't Pick Inventory and Creates One Invoice

james-2
Banned User
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Product Type That Won't Pick Inventory and Creates One Invoice

Sharan-F
Hi James

Sorry if this message is duplicated, I've tried sending it a couple of
times to the mailing list but for some reason hasn't got through.

How about looking at it from another angle?

In OFBiz there is a accounting.properties configuration file. (You can
find it in applications/accounting/config/accounting.properties.) I
think the default setting is that OFBiz creates an invoice per shipment
and perhaps the different product types that you want are creating
multiple shipment groups and therefore multiple invoices..

See below for an extract of the default settings
/**/
/*# create invoice per shipment = Y Invoice per order = N */
/*create.invoice.per.shipment=Y*/
/**/
Perhaps changing the setting to create.invoice.per.shipment=N and
Invoice.per.order=Y and trying with a finished and digital good could
give you the result you need.

Thanks
Sharan



On 2017-06-28 16:35 (+0200), <[hidden email]> wrote:
 > I have been trying to figure out if there is a way to have an order with
 > an Item (Finished Good) that requires picking/packing in warehouse as
 > well as an item that does not require picking/packing in which after the
 > system goes through the packing process it creates One invoice for both
 > items.
 >
 > I have tested the following product types
 >
 > Service - Creates separate invoice and requires to perform the service
 > manually and then manually invoice the service
 > Digital Good - Auto Creates 2 Separate Invoices
 > Finished/Digital - Requires picking/packing of both items in warehouse.
 >
 > Any suggestions to accomplish this?
 >
 > Thanks,
 >
 > James
 >