Hello all,
*Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* which specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is closed i.e. not in-use. All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute to record this. A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* and *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may be different for some of the weekdays as well. Please share your thoughts on this. -- Thanks and Regards, Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, [hidden email] |
Administrator
|
Hi Vaibhav,
That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when Googling for a *physical* store to go buying things. Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and link it from Facility. I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. Jacques Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : > Hello all, > > *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* which > specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is > closed i.e. not in-use. > > All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute to > record this. > > A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* and > *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may be > different for some of the weekdays as well. > > Please share your thoughts on this. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Vaibhav Jain > Hotwax Systems, > [hidden email] > |
+1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility
This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and more fields to the facility table. Thanks, Michael Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > Hi Vaibhav, > > That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when > Googling for a *physical* store to go buying things. > > Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and link > it from Facility. > > I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably > Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. > > Jacques > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >> Hello all, >> >> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* which >> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is >> closed i.e. not in-use. >> >> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute to >> record this. >> >> A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* and >> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may be >> different for some of the weekdays as well. >> >> Please share your thoughts on this. >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Vaibhav Jain >> Hotwax Systems, >> [hidden email] >> > smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Vaibhav Jain
Hi All,
The facility entity should not have the openedDate and closedDate fields, as these: 1. can't be enough for all the moments a facility can be open or closed; 2. not in line with startDate and thruDate fields (datetime type) used throughout numerous other entities to determine the lifespan of the facility The openingDateTime and closedDate time can vary from year/quarter/month/week/day to year/quarter/month/week/day for any kind of facility in relation to any kind of target audience (e.g. supplier vs customer). This is commonly related as scheduling, or calendaring. For this (basic) functionalities (screens, services and entities) are already in place in OFBiz.. See as a starting point: the work effort component, or even better the asset management component. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Vaibhav Jain < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hello all, > > *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* which > specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is > closed i.e. not in-use. > > All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute to > record this. > > A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* and > *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may be > different for some of the weekdays as well. > > Please share your thoughts on this. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Vaibhav Jain > Hotwax Systems, > [hidden email] > |
In reply to this post by Michael Brohl-3
Hi,
Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do so we have linked techDataCalendar with facility > <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> > <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> > </extend-entity> Thanks Pierre On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: > +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility > > This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and > more fields to the facility table. > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >> Hi Vaibhav, >> >> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when >> Googling for a *physical* store to go buying things. >> >> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and link >> it from Facility. >> >> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably >> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >> >> Jacques >> >> >> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>> Hello all, >>> >>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* >>> which >>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is >>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>> >>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an >>> attribute to >>> record this. >>> >>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* >>> and >>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* >>> may be >>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>> >>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Vaibhav Jain >>> Hotwax Systems, >>> [hidden email] >>> >> > > |
Administrator
|
Thanks for the info Pierre,
Exactly the right answer! I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less manufacturing :) BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general there. Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility Jacques Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : > Hi, > > Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do so we have linked techDataCalendar with facility >> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> >> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> >> </extend-entity> > > Thanks > > Pierre > On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: >> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility >> >> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and more fields to the facility table. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael >> >> >> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >>> Hi Vaibhav, >>> >>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when Googling for a *physical* store to go buying things. >>> >>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and link it from Facility. >>> >>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* which >>>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is >>>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>>> >>>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute to >>>> record this. >>>> >>>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* and >>>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may be >>>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>>> >>>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks and Regards, >>>> Vaibhav Jain >>>> Hotwax Systems, >>>> [hidden email] >>>> >>> >> >> > > |
Hey Jacques,
You're welcome. {quote} Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility {quote} Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would need to apply more than 1 calendar? Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Thanks for the info Pierre, > > Exactly the right answer! > > I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less > manufacturing :) > > BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in > workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general there. > > Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field > name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility > > Jacques > > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do so >> we have linked techDataCalendar with facility >> >>> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> >>> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> >>> </extend-entity> >>> >> >> Thanks >> >> Pierre >> On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: >> >>> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility >>> >>> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and more >>> fields to the facility table. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >>> >>>> Hi Vaibhav, >>>> >>>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when Googling >>>> for a *physical* store to go buying things. >>>> >>>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and link >>>> it from Facility. >>>> >>>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably >>>> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* >>>>> which >>>>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is >>>>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>>>> >>>>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute >>>>> to >>>>> record this. >>>>> >>>>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* >>>>> and >>>>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may >>>>> be >>>>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>>>> >>>>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks and Regards, >>>>> Vaibhav Jain >>>>> Hotwax Systems, >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > |
Administrator
|
Hi Pierre,
Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? Jacques Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : > Hey Jacques, > > You're welcome. > > {quote} > Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field > name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility > {quote} > > Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would need to > apply more than 1 calendar? > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the info Pierre, >> >> Exactly the right answer! >> >> I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less >> manufacturing :) >> >> BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in >> workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general there. >> >> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >> >> Jacques >> >> >> >> Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do so >>> we have linked techDataCalendar with facility >>> >>>> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> >>>> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> >>>> </extend-entity> >>>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Pierre >>> On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility >>>> >>>> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and more >>>> fields to the facility table. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >>>> >>>>> Hi Vaibhav, >>>>> >>>>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when Googling >>>>> for a *physical* store to go buying things. >>>>> >>>>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and link >>>>> it from Facility. >>>>> >>>>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably >>>>> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* >>>>>> which >>>>>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is >>>>>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>>>>> >>>>>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute >>>>>> to >>>>>> record this. >>>>>> >>>>>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* >>>>>> and >>>>>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may >>>>>> be >>>>>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks and Regards, >>>>>> Vaibhav Jain >>>>>> Hotwax Systems, >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> |
Hi Jacques, All,
Consider following scenarios: 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city government has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for trucks, and other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers 2. a calendar for customers 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream up other scenarios too. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) > > More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? > > Jacques > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : > >> Hey Jacques, >> >> You're welcome. >> >> {quote} >> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >> {quote} >> >> Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would need to >> apply more than 1 calendar? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> >> >> OFBiz based solutions & services >> >> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 >> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >> >> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the info Pierre, >>> >>> Exactly the right answer! >>> >>> I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less >>> manufacturing :) >>> >>> BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in >>> workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general there. >>> >>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do so >>>> we have linked techDataCalendar with facility >>>> >>>> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> >>>>> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> >>>>> </extend-entity> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility >>>>> >>>>> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and more >>>>> fields to the facility table. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Michael >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Vaibhav, >>>>>> >>>>>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when >>>>>> Googling >>>>>> for a *physical* store to go buying things. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and link >>>>>> it from Facility. >>>>>> >>>>>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably >>>>>> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* >>>>>>> which >>>>>>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> record this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Thanks and Regards, >>>>>>> Vaibhav Jain >>>>>>> Hotwax Systems, >>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> > |
Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join
entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? Pierre On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi Jacques, All, > > Consider following scenarios: > > 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city government > has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for trucks, and > other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: > 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers > 2. a calendar for customers > 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: > 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics > service providers > 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours > 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours > > Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding > working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream up > other scenarios too. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Pierre, >> >> Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) >> >> More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? >> >> Jacques >> >> >> Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : >> >>> Hey Jacques, >>> >>> You're welcome. >>> >>> {quote} >>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>> {quote} >>> >>> Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would need to >>> apply more than 1 calendar? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> >>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>> >>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>> >>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 >>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the info Pierre, >>>> Exactly the right answer! >>>> >>>> I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less >>>> manufacturing :) >>>> >>>> BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in >>>> workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general there. >>>> >>>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do so >>>>> we have linked techDataCalendar with facility >>>>> >>>>> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> >>>>>> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> >>>>>> </extend-entity> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>> Pierre >>>>> On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility >>>>>> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and more >>>>>> fields to the facility table. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Michael >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Vaibhav, >>>>>>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when >>>>>>> Googling >>>>>>> for a *physical* store to go buying things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and link >>>>>>> it from Facility. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably >>>>>>> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* >>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> record this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards, >>>>>>>> Vaibhav Jain >>>>>>>> Hotwax Systems, >>>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> |
Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this could
be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required then one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. Best regards, Pierre On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin <[hidden email]> wrote: > Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join > entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, > facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? > > Pierre > > > On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: > > Hi Jacques, All, > > > > Consider following scenarios: > > > > 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city government > > has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for trucks, > and > > other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: > > 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers > > 2. a calendar for customers > > 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: > > 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics > > service providers > > 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours > > 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours > > > > Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding > > working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream up > > other scenarios too. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Pierre Smits > > > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > > OFBiz based solutions & services > > > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Pierre, > >> > >> Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) > >> > >> More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> > >> Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : > >> > >>> Hey Jacques, > >>> > >>> You're welcome. > >>> > >>> {quote} > >>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field > >>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility > >>> {quote} > >>> > >>> Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would > need to > >>> apply more than 1 calendar? > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Pierre Smits > >>> > >>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > >>> > >>> OFBiz based solutions & services > >>> > >>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 > >>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > >>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > >>> > >>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > >>> [hidden email]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks for the info Pierre, > >>>> Exactly the right answer! > >>>> > >>>> I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less > >>>> manufacturing :) > >>>> > >>>> BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in > >>>> workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general > there. > >>>> > >>>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field > >>>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>>> Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do > so > >>>>> we have linked techDataCalendar with facility > >>>>> > >>>>> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> > >>>>>> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> > >>>>>> </extend-entity> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>> Pierre > >>>>> On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility > >>>>>> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and > more > >>>>>> fields to the facility table. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Michael > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Vaibhav, > >>>>>>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when > >>>>>>> Googling > >>>>>>> for a *physical* store to go buying things. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and > link > >>>>>>> it from Facility. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably > >>>>>>> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello all, > >>>>>>>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* > >>>>>>>> which > >>>>>>>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the > facility > >>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>> closed i.e. not in-use. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an > attribute > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> record this. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record > *openingTime* > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* > may > >>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>> different for some of the weekdays as well. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Please share your thoughts on this. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards, > >>>>>>>> Vaibhav Jain > >>>>>>>> Hotwax Systems, > >>>>>>>> [hidden email] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > > -- ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project |
Hi Pierre,
The "primary" pattern is often used such in productCategory or productStore entity. It can simplify acces for simple use. Thanks Pierre G On 25/11/2017 22:26, Pierre Smits wrote: Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this could be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required then one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. Best regards, Pierre On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin [hidden email] wrote:Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? Pierre On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote:Hi Jacques, All, Consider following scenarios: 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city government has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for trucks,andother set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers 2. a calendar for customers 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream up other scenarios too. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote:Hi Pierre, Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? Jacques Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit :Hey Jacques, You're welcome. {quote} Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility {quote} Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility wouldneed toapply more than 1 calendar? Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: Thanks for the info Pierre,Exactly the right answer! I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less manufacturing :) BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more generalthere.Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility Jacques Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : Hi,Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To dosowe have linked techDataCalendar with facility <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"><field name="calendarId" type="value" /> </extend-entity> ThanksPierre On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facilityThis will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more andmorefields to the facility table. Thanks, Michael Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi Vaibhav,That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when Googling for a *physical* store to go buying things. Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity andlinkit from Facility. I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. Jacques Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : Hello all,*Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* which specify that facility opening date and closing date if thefacilityis closed i.e. not in-use. All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have anattributeto record this. A retail store is also a facility and we should record*openingTime*and *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime*maybe different for some of the weekdays as well. Please share your thoughts on this. -- Thanks and Regards, Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, [hidden email]--Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project
--
|
+1 for FacilityCalendar entity with purpose.
-- Thanks & Regards --- Arun Patidar Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. www.hotwaxsystems.com On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, pierre <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > The "primary" pattern is often used such in productCategory or > productStore entity. > It can simplify acces for simple use. > > Thanks > > Pierre G > > > > On 25/11/2017 22:26, Pierre Smits wrote: > > Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this could > be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? > If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required then > one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = > primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. > > Best regards, > > Pierre > > > On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join > entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, > facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? > > Pierre > > > On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: > > Hi Jacques, All, > > Consider following scenarios: > > 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city government > has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for trucks, > > and > > other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: > 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers > 2. a calendar for customers > 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: > 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics > service providers > 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours > 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours > > Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding > working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream up > other scenarios too. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi Pierre, > > Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) > > More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? > > Jacques > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : > > > Hey Jacques, > > You're welcome. > > {quote} > Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field > name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility > {quote} > > Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would > > need to > > apply more than 1 calendar? > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> > > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Thanks for the info Pierre, > > Exactly the right answer! > > I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less > manufacturing :) > > BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in > workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general > > there. > > Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field > name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility > > Jacques > > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : > > Hi, > > Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do > > so > > we have linked techDataCalendar with facility > > <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> > > <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> > </extend-entity> > > Thanks > > Pierre > On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: > > +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility > > This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and > > more > > fields to the facility table. > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > > Hi Vaibhav, > > That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when > Googling > for a *physical* store to go buying things. > > Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and > > link > > it from Facility. > > I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably > Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. > > Jacques > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : > > Hello all, > > *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* > which > specify that facility opening date and closing date if the > > facility > > is > closed i.e. not in-use. > > All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an > > attribute > > to > record this. > > A retail store is also a facility and we should record > > *openingTime* > > and > *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* > > may > > be > different for some of the weekdays as well. > > Please share your thoughts on this. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Vaibhav Jain > Hotwax Systems,[hidden email] > > > -- > > Pierre Smits > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > > > -- > [image: logoNrd] <http://nereide.fr/> > Pierre GAUDIN > Consultant Fonctionnel Apache-OFBiz, ERP en logiciel Libre > [hidden email] > 8 rue des Déportés 37000 TOURS > Std: 02 47 50 30 54 - mob: 06 08 40 25 70 > réseau LE <http://www.libre-entreprise.org/> > > |
I think we can use TemporalExpression to manage this data.
Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Arun Patidar < [hidden email]> wrote: > +1 for FacilityCalendar entity with purpose. > > -- > Thanks & Regards > --- > Arun Patidar > Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. > > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, pierre <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi Pierre, > > > > The "primary" pattern is often used such in productCategory or > > productStore entity. > > It can simplify acces for simple use. > > > > Thanks > > > > Pierre G > > > > > > > > On 25/11/2017 22:26, Pierre Smits wrote: > > > > Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this > could > > be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? > > If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required then > > one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = > > primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Pierre > > > > > > On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin <[hidden email]> < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join > > entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, > > facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? > > > > Pierre > > > > > > On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: > > > > Hi Jacques, All, > > > > Consider following scenarios: > > > > 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city government > > has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for trucks, > > > > and > > > > other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: > > 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers > > 2. a calendar for customers > > 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: > > 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics > > service providers > > 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours > > 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours > > > > Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding > > working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream up > > other scenarios too. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> > > OFBiz based solutions & services > > > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Pierre, > > > > Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) > > > > More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? > > > > Jacques > > > > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : > > > > > > Hey Jacques, > > > > You're welcome. > > > > {quote} > > Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field > > name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility > > {quote} > > > > Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would > > > > need to > > > > apply more than 1 calendar? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> > > > > OFBiz based solutions & services > > > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the info Pierre, > > > > Exactly the right answer! > > > > I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less > > manufacturing :) > > > > BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in > > workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general > > > > there. > > > > Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field > > name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do > > > > so > > > > we have linked techDataCalendar with facility > > > > <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> > > > > <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> > > </extend-entity> > > > > Thanks > > > > Pierre > > On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: > > > > +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility > > > > This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and > > > > more > > > > fields to the facility table. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael > > > > > > Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > > > > Hi Vaibhav, > > > > That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when > > Googling > > for a *physical* store to go buying things. > > > > Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and > > > > link > > > > it from Facility. > > > > I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably > > Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. > > > > Jacques > > > > > > Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : > > > > Hello all, > > > > *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* > > which > > specify that facility opening date and closing date if the > > > > facility > > > > is > > closed i.e. not in-use. > > > > All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an > > > > attribute > > > > to > > record this. > > > > A retail store is also a facility and we should record > > > > *openingTime* > > > > and > > *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* > > > > may > > > > be > > different for some of the weekdays as well. > > > > Please share your thoughts on this. > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards, > > Vaibhav Jain > > Hotwax Systems,[hidden email] > > > > > > -- > > > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> > > OFBiz based solutions & services > > > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > > > > > > > -- > > [image: logoNrd] <http://nereide.fr/> > > Pierre GAUDIN > > Consultant Fonctionnel Apache-OFBiz, ERP en logiciel Libre > > [hidden email] > > 8 rue des Déportés 37000 TOURS > > Std: 02 47 50 30 54 - mob: 06 08 40 25 70 > > réseau LE <http://www.libre-entreprise.org/> > > > > > |
Administrator
|
Hi Deepak,
Seems to me that FacilityCalendar would be easier My 2cts Jacques Le 27/11/2017 à 07:00, Deepak Dixit a écrit : > I think we can use TemporalExpression to manage this data. > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > www.hotwax.co > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Arun Patidar < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> +1 for FacilityCalendar entity with purpose. >> >> -- >> Thanks & Regards >> --- >> Arun Patidar >> Manager, Enterprise Software Development >> >> HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. >> >> www.hotwaxsystems.com >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, pierre <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Pierre, >>> >>> The "primary" pattern is often used such in productCategory or >>> productStore entity. >>> It can simplify acces for simple use. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Pierre G >>> >>> >>> >>> On 25/11/2017 22:26, Pierre Smits wrote: >>> >>> Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this >> could >>> be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? >>> If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required then >>> one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = >>> primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Pierre >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin <[hidden email]> < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join >>> entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, >>> facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? >>> >>> Pierre >>> >>> >>> On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jacques, All, >>> >>> Consider following scenarios: >>> >>> 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city government >>> has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for trucks, >>> >>> and >>> >>> other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: >>> 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service providers >>> 2. a calendar for customers >>> 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: >>> 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics >>> service providers >>> 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours >>> 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours >>> >>> Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding >>> working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream up >>> other scenarios too. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>> >>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Pierre, >>> >>> Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) >>> >>> More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>> >>> >>> Hey Jacques, >>> >>> You're welcome. >>> >>> {quote} >>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>> {quote} >>> >>> Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would >>> >>> need to >>> >>> apply more than 1 calendar? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>> >>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>> >>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> Thanks for the info Pierre, >>> >>> Exactly the right answer! >>> >>> I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less >>> manufacturing :) >>> >>> BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in >>> workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general >>> >>> there. >>> >>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do >>> >>> so >>> >>> we have linked techDataCalendar with facility >>> >>> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> >>> >>> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> >>> </extend-entity> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Pierre >>> On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: >>> >>> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility >>> >>> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and >>> >>> more >>> >>> fields to the facility table. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >>> >>> Hi Vaibhav, >>> >>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when >>> Googling >>> for a *physical* store to go buying things. >>> >>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and >>> >>> link >>> >>> it from Facility. >>> >>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably >>> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* >>> which >>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the >>> >>> facility >>> >>> is >>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>> >>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an >>> >>> attribute >>> >>> to >>> record this. >>> >>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record >>> >>> *openingTime* >>> >>> and >>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* >>> >>> may >>> >>> be >>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>> >>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Vaibhav Jain >>> Hotwax Systems,[hidden email] >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>> >>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> [image: logoNrd] <http://nereide.fr/> >>> Pierre GAUDIN >>> Consultant Fonctionnel Apache-OFBiz, ERP en logiciel Libre >>> [hidden email] >>> 8 rue des Déportés 37000 TOURS >>> Std: 02 47 50 30 54 - mob: 06 08 40 25 70 >>> réseau LE <http://www.libre-entreprise.org/> >>> >>> |
Hello all,
Sorry for late reply as I was out of town. Thank you very much to all of you for sharing this valuable information. As we can conclude this conversation here. I will create a new entity facilityCalendar which will create the one-to-many relationship between facility and calendar. Here are the entity attributes: 1. facilityId* 2. calendarId* 3. fromDate* 4. thruDate A calendar will be used to store *openingTime*, *closingTime*, working weekdays and all this type of stuff. If this looks good to everyone then I will raise a JIRA for this. Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, [hidden email] On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Deepak, > > Seems to me that FacilityCalendar would be easier > > My 2cts > > Jacques > > > > Le 27/11/2017 à 07:00, Deepak Dixit a écrit : > >> I think we can use TemporalExpression to manage this data. >> >> Thanks & Regards >> -- >> Deepak Dixit >> www.hotwaxsystems.com >> www.hotwax.co >> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Arun Patidar < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >> +1 for FacilityCalendar entity with purpose. >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks & Regards >>> --- >>> Arun Patidar >>> Manager, Enterprise Software Development >>> >>> HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. >>> >>> www.hotwaxsystems.com >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, pierre <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Pierre, >>>> >>>> The "primary" pattern is often used such in productCategory or >>>> productStore entity. >>>> It can simplify acces for simple use. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Pierre G >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 25/11/2017 22:26, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>> >>>> Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this >>>> >>> could >>> >>>> be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? >>>> If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required >>>> then >>>> one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = >>>> primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin <[hidden email]> < >>>> >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join >>>> entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, >>>> facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> >>>> >>>> On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jacques, All, >>>> >>>> Consider following scenarios: >>>> >>>> 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city >>>> government >>>> has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for >>>> trucks, >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: >>>> 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service >>>> providers >>>> 2. a calendar for customers >>>> 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: >>>> 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics >>>> service providers >>>> 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours >>>> 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours >>>> >>>> Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding >>>> working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream >>>> up >>>> other scenarios too. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre Smits >>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>>> >>>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>>> >>>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Pierre, >>>> >>>> Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) >>>> >>>> More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>> Hey Jacques, >>>> >>>> You're welcome. >>>> >>>> {quote} >>>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>>> {quote} >>>> >>>> Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would >>>> >>>> need to >>>> >>>> apply more than 1 calendar? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre Smits >>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>>> >>>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>>> >>>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>>> >>>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the info Pierre, >>>> >>>> Exactly the right answer! >>>> >>>> I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less >>>> manufacturing :) >>>> >>>> BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in >>>> workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general >>>> >>>> there. >>>> >>>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do >>>> >>>> so >>>> >>>> we have linked techDataCalendar with facility >>>> >>>> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> >>>> >>>> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> >>>> </extend-entity> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility >>>> >>>> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and >>>> >>>> more >>>> >>>> fields to the facility table. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >>>> >>>> Hi Vaibhav, >>>> >>>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when >>>> Googling >>>> for a *physical* store to go buying things. >>>> >>>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and >>>> >>>> link >>>> >>>> it from Facility. >>>> >>>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably >>>> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* >>>> which >>>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the >>>> >>>> facility >>>> >>>> is >>>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>>> >>>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an >>>> >>>> attribute >>>> >>>> to >>>> record this. >>>> >>>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record >>>> >>>> *openingTime* >>>> >>>> and >>>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* >>>> >>>> may >>>> >>>> be >>>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>>> >>>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks and Regards, >>>> Vaibhav Jain >>>> Hotwax Systems,[hidden email] >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Pierre Smits >>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>>> >>>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> [image: logoNrd] <http://nereide.fr/> >>>> Pierre GAUDIN >>>> Consultant Fonctionnel Apache-OFBiz, ERP en logiciel Libre >>>> [hidden email] >>>> 8 rue des Déportés 37000 TOURS >>>> Std: 02 47 50 30 54 - mob: 06 08 40 25 70 >>>> réseau LE <http://www.libre-entreprise.org/> >>>> >>>> >>>> > |
Hello all,
Here is the link to ticket OFBIZ-10040 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10040> raised on JIRA. Thanks & Regards, Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, [hidden email] On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Vaibhav Jain < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry for late reply as I was out of town. > > Thank you very much to all of you for sharing this valuable information. > > As we can conclude this conversation here. > > I will create a new entity facilityCalendar which will create the > one-to-many relationship between facility and calendar. Here are the entity > attributes: > > 1. facilityId* > 2. calendarId* > 3. fromDate* > 4. thruDate > > A calendar will be used to store *openingTime*, *closingTime*, working > weekdays and all this type of stuff. > > If this looks good to everyone then I will raise a JIRA for this. > > Thanks & Regards > > Vaibhav Jain > Hotwax Systems, > [hidden email] > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Deepak, >> >> Seems to me that FacilityCalendar would be easier >> >> My 2cts >> >> Jacques >> >> >> >> Le 27/11/2017 à 07:00, Deepak Dixit a écrit : >> >>> I think we can use TemporalExpression to manage this data. >>> >>> Thanks & Regards >>> -- >>> Deepak Dixit >>> www.hotwaxsystems.com >>> www.hotwax.co >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Arun Patidar < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for FacilityCalendar entity with purpose. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks & Regards >>>> --- >>>> Arun Patidar >>>> Manager, Enterprise Software Development >>>> >>>> HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. >>>> >>>> www.hotwaxsystems.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, pierre <[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Pierre, >>>>> >>>>> The "primary" pattern is often used such in productCategory or >>>>> productStore entity. >>>>> It can simplify acces for simple use. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Pierre G >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 25/11/2017 22:26, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this >>>>> >>>> could >>>> >>>>> be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? >>>>> If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required >>>>> then >>>>> one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = >>>>> primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Pierre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin <[hidden email]> >>>>> < >>>>> >>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join >>>>> entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, >>>>> facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? >>>>> >>>>> Pierre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jacques, All, >>>>> >>>>> Consider following scenarios: >>>>> >>>>> 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city >>>>> government >>>>> has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for >>>>> trucks, >>>>> >>>>> and >>>>> >>>>> other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: >>>>> 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service >>>>> providers >>>>> 2. a calendar for customers >>>>> 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: >>>>> 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics >>>>> service providers >>>>> 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours >>>>> 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours >>>>> >>>>> Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding >>>>> working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream >>>>> up >>>>> other scenarios too. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>>>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>>>> >>>>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>>>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> >>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Pierre, >>>>> >>>>> Actually I was answering to Pierre Gaudin :) >>>>> >>>>> More than one calendar for a facility? Do you have an example? >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 15:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey Jacques, >>>>> >>>>> You're welcome. >>>>> >>>>> {quote} >>>>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>>>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>>>> {quote} >>>>> >>>>> Are you sure? Is there no scenario possible where a facility would >>>>> >>>>> need to >>>>> >>>>> apply more than 1 calendar? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>>>> >>>>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>>>> >>>>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>>>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> >>>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for the info Pierre, >>>>> >>>>> Exactly the right answer! >>>>> >>>>> I thought there was something in workeffort data model, I know less >>>>> manufacturing :) >>>>> >>>>> BTW, I wonder why TechDataCalendar is in manufacturing rather than in >>>>> workeffort where IMO it would better fit since it's more general >>>>> >>>>> there. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, so Vaibhav, I think we can now put directly <field >>>>> name="calendarId" type="value" /> in Facility >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 13:47, pierre.gaudin a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Recently we had to store opening and closing hours for stores. To do >>>>> >>>>> so >>>>> >>>>> we have linked techDataCalendar with facility >>>>> >>>>> <extend-entity entity-name="Facility"> >>>>> >>>>> <field name="calendarId" type="value" /> >>>>> </extend-entity> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Pierre >>>>> On 25/11/2017 11:53, Michael Brohl wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for a timetable entity and linking it to facility >>>>> >>>>> This will give us much more flexibility and avoids adding more and >>>>> >>>>> more >>>>> >>>>> fields to the facility table. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Michael >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 25.11.17 um 11:39 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Vaibhav, >>>>> >>>>> That sounds reasonable to me. I notably like this feature when >>>>> Googling >>>>> for a *physical* store to go buying things. >>>>> >>>>> Then you should maybe consider having a new Timetable Entity and >>>>> >>>>> link >>>>> >>>>> it from Facility. >>>>> >>>>> I had a look at what already exists in the Data Model, notably >>>>> Timesheet and TimeEntry, but they don't really fit here. >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 25/11/2017 à 11:06, Vaibhav Jain a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* >>>>> which >>>>> specify that facility opening date and closing date if the >>>>> >>>>> facility >>>>> >>>>> is >>>>> closed i.e. not in-use. >>>>> >>>>> All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an >>>>> >>>>> attribute >>>>> >>>>> to >>>>> record this. >>>>> >>>>> A retail store is also a facility and we should record >>>>> >>>>> *openingTime* >>>>> >>>>> and >>>>> *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* >>>>> >>>>> may >>>>> >>>>> be >>>>> different for some of the weekdays as well. >>>>> >>>>> Please share your thoughts on this. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks and Regards, >>>>> Vaibhav Jain >>>>> Hotwax Systems,[hidden email] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>>>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>>>> >>>>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>>>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> [image: logoNrd] <http://nereide.fr/> >>>>> Pierre GAUDIN >>>>> Consultant Fonctionnel Apache-OFBiz, ERP en logiciel Libre >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> 8 rue des Déportés 37000 TOURS >>>>> Std: 02 47 50 30 54 - mob: 06 08 40 25 70 >>>>> réseau LE <http://www.libre-entreprise.org/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |