Question about paymentReleaseInterface in parameters

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Question about paymentReleaseInterface in parameters

Jacopo Cappellato
I've noticed that (at least in the Rita and Payflow processors) the
payflowCCVoid service (that implements the paymentReleaseInterface)
expects the "authTrans" IN parameter; however the parameter is not
defined in the paymentReleaseInterface or in the payflowCCVoid service
definitions... so I guess it is really a bug.
What is the best fix?
Add the parameter to the paymentReleaseInterface or only to the specific
payflowCCVoid (and also the one for Rita)?

Jacopo


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Question about paymentReleaseInterface in parameters

David E Jones

Without looking at it my guess would be that the authorization  
transaction ID is necessary for this operation, so not sure how  
things could work without it and yeah it should be in the interface.

I'm just guessing here... but the void services must not be used  
much... ;)

-David


On Apr 13, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> I've noticed that (at least in the Rita and Payflow processors) the  
> payflowCCVoid service (that implements the paymentReleaseInterface)  
> expects the "authTrans" IN parameter; however the parameter is not  
> defined in the paymentReleaseInterface or in the payflowCCVoid  
> service definitions... so I guess it is really a bug.
> What is the best fix?
> Add the parameter to the paymentReleaseInterface or only to the  
> specific payflowCCVoid (and also the one for Rita)?
>
> Jacopo
>
>


smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Question about paymentReleaseInterface in parameters

Jacopo Cappellato
David,

thanks for your feedback.
I've added the parameter in rev 528768

Jacopo


David E. Jones wrote:

>
> Without looking at it my guess would be that the authorization
> transaction ID is necessary for this operation, so not sure how things
> could work without it and yeah it should be in the interface.
>
> I'm just guessing here... but the void services must not be used much... ;)
>
> -David
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>> I've noticed that (at least in the Rita and Payflow processors) the
>> payflowCCVoid service (that implements the paymentReleaseInterface)
>> expects the "authTrans" IN parameter; however the parameter is not
>> defined in the paymentReleaseInterface or in the payflowCCVoid service
>> definitions... so I guess it is really a bug.
>> What is the best fix?
>> Add the parameter to the paymentReleaseInterface or only to the
>> specific payflowCCVoid (and also the one for Rita)?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>