Hello Everyone,
In RMA process, there are two types of return items i.e. Refund and Replacement. Actually, there are few more types but consider these two to focus on the actual problem. CASE 1: Create return with return items of type 'Refund'. When return is received, an invoice is created to refund to the customer. *Issue: *No Issue CASE 2: Create return with return items of type 'Replacement'. When return is received, a sales order with order total zero ($ 0) is created against return. And, can be processed as usual. *Issue: *An Invoice is created against the return. I think it should not be created as an order is already created in replacement of received items. Please feel free to add your views and comments. -- Thanks and Regards, *Amit Gadaley <https://about.me/amit_gadaley>* | Senior Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore, M.P., India - 452010 Cell phone: +91 958.459.3069 <https://about.me/amit_gadaley?promo=email_sig> |
+1 to the solution proposed for the issue reported in case 2, if replacement is done with the similar item and type is not serialized. Best Regards, Sanjay Yadav | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance 80, Scheme No. 78, Part II, Indore, M.P. 452010, India Mobile Phone: 787 918 8830 | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav HotWax Systems recently received 8 mentions in The Gartner Digital Commerce Vendor Guide, 2016 by Gartner, Inc., the world's leading IT research and advisory company. Learn more about our research here. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Amit Gadaley <[hidden email]> wrote: Hello Everyone, |
Administrator
|
+1, makes sense, though for instance Amazon is creating invoice with 0 (zero) amount for such case. I was surprised by this, OFBiz can do better ;)
I did not look into details, but *if the user has enough information about the replacement* I see no reasons to create a void invoice. So please check this condition. I guess Amazon uses a void invoice as a place holder, again not necessary, and IMO even confusing if you have links and info about the replacement Thanks Jacques Le 14/11/2017 à 10:49, Sanjay Yadav a écrit : > +1 to the solution proposed for the issue reported in case 2, if replacement is done with the similar item and type is not serialized. > > Best Regards,* > * > * > * > *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/>by**HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > 80, Scheme No. 78, Part II, Indore, M.P. 452010, India > Mobile Phone: 787 918 8830 | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/> > > HotWax Systems recently received 8 mentions in /*The Gartner Digital Commerce Vendor Guide, 2016 */by Gartner, Inc., the world's leading IT research > and advisory company.//Learn more about our researchhere <https://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/newsletters/HotWax/1-2UVLP6M/index.html>. > Inline image 1 > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Amit Gadaley <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > In RMA process, there are two types of return items i.e. Refund and > Replacement. Actually, there are few more types but consider these two to > focus on the actual problem. > > CASE 1: Create return with return items of type 'Refund'. When return is > received, an invoice is created to refund to the customer. > *Issue: *No Issue > > CASE 2: Create return with return items of type 'Replacement'. When return > is received, a sales order with order total zero ($ 0) is created against > return. And, can be processed as usual. > *Issue: *An Invoice is created against the return. I think it should not be > created as an order is already created in replacement of received items. > > Please feel free to add your views and comments. > -- > Thanks and Regards, > *Amit Gadaley <https://about.me/amit_gadaley>* | Senior Enterprise Software > Engineer > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore, > M.P., India - 452010 > Cell phone: +91 958.459.3069 > > <https://about.me/amit_gadaley?promo=email_sig <https://about.me/amit_gadaley?promo=email_sig>> > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |