Hi Bob,
Yes this sounds logical indeed. Actually we don't use the resolved status yet and this would be a good reason to use it. I'd say,
yes good idea!
If everybody agree, I will put a note about that in our contributors best practices.
Jacques
From: <
[hidden email]>
> Hi Jacques,
>
> I am finally getting back to cleaning up some of the java warnings in the code, working through special purpose right now. My
> question for you was if it is ok to be marking these as "resolved" as I add the patch file that resolves the issue. The reason
> being, it is helping me keep track of the sub-tasks that have been handled vs. the ones that have not.
>
> In the best practices, it only says that the contributors like to move things directly to closed when they are handled. But as
> someone that would like be a contributor (but is not) it is nice to be able to look at my unresolved issues and see which ones I
> have completed a patch for and which ones I have not.
>
> Thanks for your time!
> Bob Morley
>