@Jacopo I don't have a clue what you're talking about. Can you elaborate?
Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org/> since 2008 (without privileges) *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:58 AM Jacopo Cappellato <[hidden email]> wrote: > The license should not contain references to themes and framework since > these are not part of the plugins. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins/pull/8#issuecomment-598666347>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA6ERMQ3UCUDMUQURW6U7L3RHIGWDANCNFSM4LG7PLUQ> > . > |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:01 PM Pierre Smits <[hidden email]>
wrote: > @Jacopo I don't have a clue what you're talking about. Can you elaborate? Yes, I have added my comments as a code review in the PR: however I recommend that you spend some time learning how our license file is composed before you contribute to it. As a side note, if we add the LICENSE file to plugins then we will have to remove it when we release the full package (framework+plugins) so we should document this in our release guide. Jacopo |
IMO we should not confuse generating convenience packages (combining base
and plugins releases) with doing releases. Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org/> since 2008 (without privileges) *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:10 PM Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:01 PM Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > @Jacopo I don't have a clue what you're talking about. Can you elaborate? > > > Yes, I have added my comments as a code review in the PR: however I > recommend that you spend some time learning how our license file is > composed before you contribute to it. > As a side note, if we add the LICENSE file to plugins then we will have to > remove it when we release the full package (framework+plugins) so we should > document this in our release guide. > > Jacopo > |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:55 PM Pierre Smits <[hidden email]>
wrote: > IMO we should not confuse generating convenience packages (combining base > and plugins releases) with doing releases. > So far, all the official releases we have published are for the full package. Jacopo |
Indeed that is what you did. But while convenient when everything was in
one repository, that paradigm doesn't work so well with multiple repositories. See the thread about the confusion regarding releases in the repos and missing verification artefact. IIRW, our release strategy is currently a subject of discussion in other threads. Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org/> since 2008 (without privileges) *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:29 PM Jacopo Cappellato < [hidden email]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:55 PM Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > IMO we should not confuse generating convenience packages (combining base > > and plugins releases) with doing releases. > > > > So far, all the official releases we have published are for the full > package. > > Jacopo > |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:41 PM Pierre Smits <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Indeed that is what you did. What *we* did, yes. > But while convenient when everything was in > one repository, that paradigm doesn't work so well with > multiple repositories. +1 > See the thread about the confusion regarding > releases in the repos and missing verification artefact. > This has nothing to do with that confusion; that issue has been discussed for other ASF projects, see for example: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-438 > IIRW, our release strategy is currently a subject of discussion in other > threads. > Indeed. I commented here simply in response to your message about it. Jacopo |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |