Re: ofbiz help formatting

[Jacques Le Roux]

From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]>
> we cannot use the docbook xsl files because that is too slow and takes a
> lot of processing. ftl is much quicker here.....so in the help files we
> use a limited docbook functionality
>
> Regards,
> Hans

Yes, now that it works again, on demo trunk it takes 30 sec to perform
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML

BJ: as we already spoken about that, I know you only used it as an example. For the others please don't use this link on demo, use
only the Online Help (question Mark button)!

Thanks

Jacques
PS: for users (I already sent to dev list), we have now 4GB of memory for our demo instances and I have fixed a bag locking threads
bug yesterday. So you should have a better experience now. Though we still have an issue related to this bug
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916062. We use 6u22-rev(b04) which has a buggy Hot Spot, I will upgrade to 6u22-rev(b09)
soon. Then we should be able to run 3 demos when needed, I mean R9.04, R10.04 and trunk...

> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 17:40 -0800, BJ Freeman wrote:
>> it seems that help does not use the docbooks xsl files to generated the
>> output.
>> if it did it would use the docbook.css.
>> the end result is that the formatting elemments in the docbook files are
>> not generated in the help output of the files.
>>
>> I would like to move to the docbook output so the top level help will
>> see the TOC in the right pain.
>>
>> At this point I am not going to try to do anything with the left navigation.
>> https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML#N20080
>> select the TOC and below for a view source
>> then open up help on any app and click on setup to see the difference
>> view the source of the help.
>>
>> Opinions?
>
> --
> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> PS: for users (I already sent to dev list), we have now 4GB of memory for our demo instances and I have fixed a bag locking
> threads
> bug yesterday. So you should have a better experience now. Though we still have an issue related to this bug
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916062. We use 6u22-rev(b04) which has a buggy Hot Spot, I will upgrade to 6u22-rev(b09)
> soon. Then we should be able to run 3 demos when needed, I mean R9.04, R10.04 and trunk...

Gavin from infra team just upgraded Java to
java version "1.6.0_23"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_23-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.0-b09, mixed mode)

Hopefully this will fix the last issue we had with the trunk. We will still experience few leaks on stable (R9.04) but that should
not be a problem for now (we have plenty of memory). It would be better to fix this(these?) leaks before we try to run 3 demos on
server. Another option is to drop R9.04...

From 2.5GB to 4GB + a new Java, it's already Christmas on the OFBiz demo server :) thanks Gavin!

Jacques

[BJ Freeman]

thanks Jacques, for you dedication to this problem

=========================
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/18/2010 3:54 AM:

> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>> PS: for users (I already sent to dev list), we have now 4GB of memory
>> for our demo instances and I have fixed a bag locking
>> threads
>> bug yesterday. So you should have a better experience now. Though we
>> still have an issue related to this bug
>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916062. We use 6u22-rev(b04)
>> which has a buggy Hot Spot, I will upgrade to 6u22-rev(b09)
>> soon. Then we should be able to run 3 demos when needed, I mean R9.04,
>> R10.04 and trunk...
>
> Gavin from infra team just upgraded Java to
> java version "1.6.0_23"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_23-b05)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.0-b09, mixed mode)
>
> Hopefully this will fix the last issue we had with the trunk. We will
> still experience few leaks on stable (R9.04) but that should
> not be a problem for now (we have plenty of memory). It would be better
> to fix this(these?) leaks before we try to run 3 demos on server.
> Another option is to drop R9.04...
>
>> From 2.5GB to 4GB + a new Java, it's already Christmas on the OFBiz
>> demo server :) thanks Gavin!
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
>

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

Thank you, Jacques.

Jacopo

On Dec 18, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>> PS: for users (I already sent to dev list), we have now 4GB of memory for our demo instances and I have fixed a bag locking
>> threads
>> bug yesterday. So you should have a better experience now. Though we still have an issue related to this bug
>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916062. We use 6u22-rev(b04) which has a buggy Hot Spot, I will upgrade to 6u22-rev(b09)
>> soon. Then we should be able to run 3 demos when needed, I mean R9.04, R10.04 and trunk...
>
> Gavin from infra team just upgraded Java to
> java version "1.6.0_23"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_23-b05)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.0-b09, mixed mode)
>
> Hopefully this will fix the last issue we had with the trunk. We will still experience few leaks on stable (R9.04) but that should
> not be a problem for now (we have plenty of memory). It would be better to fix this(these?) leaks before we try to run 3 demos on server. Another option is to drop R9.04...
>
> From 2.5GB to 4GB + a new Java, it's already Christmas on the OFBiz demo server :) thanks Gavin!
>
> Jacques
>
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Jacopo,

Seems that the bug fix and JVM upgrade did the trick. Any crashes since, when we had 2 or 3 by days before. I'm sure we all enjoy
:o)

The point to remember: the 64bits JVM for server is buggy between 1.6.0_18  and 1.6.0_22-b09 (also wrong: 1.6.0_23-b01, see link
below for those interested).
AFAIK, only the 64bits JVM server version is wrong, due to its Hot Spot compiler. Also maybe only AMD64 servers are concerned, not
sure. At least the version below, 1.6.0_23-b05, is safe...

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

> Thank you, Jacques.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Dec 18, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>> PS: for users (I already sent to dev list), we have now 4GB of memory for our demo instances and I have fixed a bag locking
>>> threads
>>> bug yesterday. So you should have a better experience now. Though we still have an issue related to this bug
>>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916062. We use 6u22-rev(b04) which has a buggy Hot Spot, I will upgrade to 6u22-rev(b09)
>>> soon. Then we should be able to run 3 demos when needed, I mean R9.04, R10.04 and trunk...
>>
>> Gavin from infra team just upgraded Java to
>> java version "1.6.0_23"
>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_23-b05)
>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.0-b09, mixed mode)
>>
>> Hopefully this will fix the last issue we had with the trunk. We will still experience few leaks on stable (R9.04) but that
>> should
>> not be a problem for now (we have plenty of memory). It would be better to fix this(these?) leaks before we try to run 3 demos on
>> server. Another option is to drop R9.04...
>>
>> From 2.5GB to 4GB + a new Java, it's already Christmas on the OFBiz demo server :) thanks Gavin!
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>
>