Re: svn commit: r1754402 - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/data/helpdata/ applications/accounting/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/accounting/invoice/ applications/commonext/data/ appl...

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r1754402 - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/data/helpdata/ applications/accounting/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/accounting/invoice/ applications/commonext/data/ appl...

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Le 28/07/2016 à 14:27, [hidden email] a écrit :
> Author: jleroux
> Date: Thu Jul 28 12:27:20 2016
> New Revision: 1754402
>
> URL:http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1754402&view=rev
> Log:
> This removes the pos component.
>
> Most is done already. Test pass but testFopMacroLibrary but I don't see how it could be related to these changes, could be a quirk on Windows, BuilBot will tell us. Anyway, I will later double-check to be sure, also to see if I did not miss anything else.

The test passed on BuildBot. So I'll double-check here, but it seems to be another Windows quirk. Maybe related with a recent change with FOP? I
already checked, it's not my local FOP config (nothing changed).

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r1754402 - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ applications/accounting/config/ applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/data/helpdata/ applications/accounting/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/accounting/invoice/ applications/commonext/data/ appl...

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Le 28/07/2016 à 15:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Le 28/07/2016 à 14:27, [hidden email] a écrit :
>> Author: jleroux
>> Date: Thu Jul 28 12:27:20 2016
>> New Revision: 1754402
>>
>> URL:http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1754402&view=rev
>> Log:
>> This removes the pos component.
>>
>> Most is done already. Test pass but testFopMacroLibrary but I don't see how it could be related to these changes, could be a quirk on Windows,
>> BuilBot will tell us. Anyway, I will later double-check to be sure, also to see if I did not miss anything else.
>
> The test passed on BuildBot. So I'll double-check here, but it seems to be another Windows quirk. Maybe related with a recent change with FOP? I
> already checked, it's not my local FOP config (nothing changed).
>
> Jacques

I tried to remove JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS=-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 that I have set as a convenient VAR env inWindows to no avail :/

Not a big deal (BuildBot passes) but annoying

Jacques