Yes good question, because, as I mentioned in the commit comment, I wanted to revisit it.
My idea was to replace it by using PartyViewName. But now that I look at it again, it's not worth the burden.
This is only an example for demoing Flexible Reports with services.
I just removed it with another useless line I left there
Jacques
Le 07/04/2017 à 08:52, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:23 AM, <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Author: jleroux
>> Date: Fri Apr 7 04:23:17 2017
>> New Revision: 1790499
>>
>> ==================
>> --- ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/birt/entitydef/ServiceReportsView.xml
>> (original)
>> +++ ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/birt/entitydef/ServiceReportsView.xml Fri
>> Apr 7 04:23:17 2017
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ under the License.
>> <alias entity-alias="INITM" name="quantity"/>
>> <alias entity-alias="INITM" name="amount"/>
>> <alias entity-alias="PA" name="partyId"/>
>> - <alias entity-alias="PA" name="partyName"/>
>> +<!-- <alias entity-alias="PA" name="partyName"/> -->
>> <alias entity-alias="PRO" name="productId"/>
>> <alias entity-alias="PRO" name="primaryProductCategoryId"/>
>> <view-link entity-alias="INV" rel-entity-alias="INITM">
>>
>>
> Why not removing it?
>
> Jacopo
>
Locked
