Administrator
|
Le 29/04/2017 à 09:07, [hidden email] a écrit :
> Author: taher > Date: Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 > New Revision: 1793170 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793170&view=rev > Log: > Fixed: Remove all dependencies from OFBiz framework to plugins > (OFBIZ-9322) > > Further removed dependencies on demo data defined in ecommerce by modifying > the following data items: > - Move the DemoSupplier demo data from ecommerce to accounting > - Move the PartyIdentificationType of "CARD_ID" from ecommerce to party > > This brings down total failing tests to only two > > Modified: > ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml > ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/party/data/PartyDemoData.xml > > Modified: ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml?rev=1793170&r1=1793169&r2=1793170&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml (original) > +++ ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 > @@ -74,13 +74,17 @@ under the License. > > <Invoice invoiceId="8001" invoiceTypeId="PURCHASE_INVOICE" partyIdFrom="AcctBigSupplier" partyId="Company" statusId="INVOICE_READY" currencyUomId="USD" invoiceDate="2009-07-06 16:48:40.952" paidDate="2009-07-06 16:52:52.901" dueDate="2009-08-05 16:48:40.952"/> > <InvoiceItem invoiceId="8001" invoiceItemSeqId="1" invoiceItemTypeId="PINV_SURCHARGE_ADJ" taxableFlag="Y" quantity="1.000000" amount="10.000"/> > - > - <!-- > - plugins components are loaded after applications components. DemoSupplier & AcctBigSupplier data exists in ecommerce component. > - So it creates foreign key violation as accounting component is loaded first and it tries to find 'DemoSupplier' and 'AcctBigSupplier' party. > - This change will help to load test data without producing any foreign key error. > - --> > - <Party partyId="DemoSupplier"/> > + > + <Party partyId="DemoSupplier" partyTypeId="PARTY_GROUP"/> > + <PartyGroup partyId="DemoSupplier" groupName="Demo Supplier"/> > + <PartyRole partyId="DemoSupplier" roleTypeId="SUPPLIER"/> > + <ContactMech contactMechId="9001" contactMechTypeId="POSTAL_ADDRESS"/> > + <PartyContactMech partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" allowSolicitation="Y"/> > + <PostalAddress contactMechId="9001" toName="Demo Supplier Company" address1="2004 Factory Blvd" city="City of Industry" postalCode="90000" countryGeoId="USA" stateProvinceGeoId="CA"/> > + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" contactMechPurposeTypeId="BILLING_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000"/> > + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" contactMechPurposeTypeId="GENERAL_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000"/> > + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" contactMechPurposeTypeId="PAYMENT_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000"/> > + <UserLogin userLoginId="DemoSupplier" currentPassword="{SHA}47b56994cbc2b6d10aa1be30f70165adb305a41a" partyId="DemoSupplier"/> > <Party partyId="AcctBigSupplier"/> > > <!--demo data for testCancelCheckRunPayments--> > Should this data not better in party component? Jacques |
Hi Jacques,
Again, feel free to change the data. My objective was simply to get tests running successfully on framework-alone and I would actually appreciate your help since you already did the viewing and testing? On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Le 29/04/2017 à 09:07, [hidden email] a écrit : > >> Author: taher >> Date: Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 >> New Revision: 1793170 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793170&view=rev >> Log: >> Fixed: Remove all dependencies from OFBiz framework to plugins >> (OFBIZ-9322) >> >> Further removed dependencies on demo data defined in ecommerce by >> modifying >> the following data items: >> - Move the DemoSupplier demo data from ecommerce to accounting >> - Move the PartyIdentificationType of "CARD_ID" from ecommerce to party >> >> This brings down total failing tests to only two >> >> Modified: >> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/De >> moPaymentsInvoices.xml >> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/party/data/PartyDe >> moData.xml >> >> Modified: ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/Dem >> oPaymentsInvoices.xml >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/app >> lications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml?rev=17931 >> 70&r1=1793169&r2=1793170&view=diff >> ============================================================ >> ================== >> --- ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml >> (original) >> +++ ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml >> Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 >> @@ -74,13 +74,17 @@ under the License. >> <Invoice invoiceId="8001" invoiceTypeId="PURCHASE_INVOICE" >> partyIdFrom="AcctBigSupplier" partyId="Company" statusId="INVOICE_READY" >> currencyUomId="USD" invoiceDate="2009-07-06 16:48:40.952" >> paidDate="2009-07-06 16:52:52.901" dueDate="2009-08-05 16:48:40.952"/> >> <InvoiceItem invoiceId="8001" invoiceItemSeqId="1" >> invoiceItemTypeId="PINV_SURCHARGE_ADJ" taxableFlag="Y" >> quantity="1.000000" amount="10.000"/> >> - >> - <!-- >> - plugins components are loaded after applications components. >> DemoSupplier & AcctBigSupplier data exists in ecommerce component. >> - So it creates foreign key violation as accounting component is >> loaded first and it tries to find 'DemoSupplier' and 'AcctBigSupplier' >> party. >> - This change will help to load test data without producing any >> foreign key error. >> - --> >> - <Party partyId="DemoSupplier"/> >> + >> + <Party partyId="DemoSupplier" partyTypeId="PARTY_GROUP"/> >> + <PartyGroup partyId="DemoSupplier" groupName="Demo Supplier"/> >> + <PartyRole partyId="DemoSupplier" roleTypeId="SUPPLIER"/> >> + <ContactMech contactMechId="9001" contactMechTypeId="POSTAL_ADDR >> ESS"/> >> + <PartyContactMech partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >> fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" allowSolicitation="Y"/> >> + <PostalAddress contactMechId="9001" toName="Demo Supplier Company" >> address1="2004 Factory Blvd" city="City of Industry" postalCode="90000" >> countryGeoId="USA" stateProvinceGeoId="CA"/> >> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >> contactMechPurposeTypeId="BILLING_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >> 00:00:00.000"/> >> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >> contactMechPurposeTypeId="GENERAL_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >> 00:00:00.000"/> >> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >> contactMechPurposeTypeId="PAYMENT_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >> 00:00:00.000"/> >> + <UserLogin userLoginId="DemoSupplier" currentPassword="{SHA}47b56994 >> cbc2b6d10aa1be30f70165adb305a41a" partyId="DemoSupplier"/> >> <Party partyId="AcctBigSupplier"/> >> <!--demo data for testCancelCheckRunPayments--> >> >> Taher, All, > > Should this data not better in party component? > > Jacques > |
Administrator
|
Done at r1794092
Jacques Le 02/05/2017 à 13:28, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > Hi Jacques, > > Again, feel free to change the data. My objective was simply to get tests > running successfully on framework-alone and I would actually appreciate > your help since you already did the viewing and testing? > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Le 29/04/2017 à 09:07, [hidden email] a écrit : >> >>> Author: taher >>> Date: Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 >>> New Revision: 1793170 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793170&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Fixed: Remove all dependencies from OFBiz framework to plugins >>> (OFBIZ-9322) >>> >>> Further removed dependencies on demo data defined in ecommerce by >>> modifying >>> the following data items: >>> - Move the DemoSupplier demo data from ecommerce to accounting >>> - Move the PartyIdentificationType of "CARD_ID" from ecommerce to party >>> >>> This brings down total failing tests to only two >>> >>> Modified: >>> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/De >>> moPaymentsInvoices.xml >>> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/party/data/PartyDe >>> moData.xml >>> >>> Modified: ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/Dem >>> oPaymentsInvoices.xml >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/app >>> lications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml?rev=17931 >>> 70&r1=1793169&r2=1793170&view=diff >>> ============================================================ >>> ================== >>> --- ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml >>> (original) >>> +++ ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml >>> Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 >>> @@ -74,13 +74,17 @@ under the License. >>> <Invoice invoiceId="8001" invoiceTypeId="PURCHASE_INVOICE" >>> partyIdFrom="AcctBigSupplier" partyId="Company" statusId="INVOICE_READY" >>> currencyUomId="USD" invoiceDate="2009-07-06 16:48:40.952" >>> paidDate="2009-07-06 16:52:52.901" dueDate="2009-08-05 16:48:40.952"/> >>> <InvoiceItem invoiceId="8001" invoiceItemSeqId="1" >>> invoiceItemTypeId="PINV_SURCHARGE_ADJ" taxableFlag="Y" >>> quantity="1.000000" amount="10.000"/> >>> - >>> - <!-- >>> - plugins components are loaded after applications components. >>> DemoSupplier & AcctBigSupplier data exists in ecommerce component. >>> - So it creates foreign key violation as accounting component is >>> loaded first and it tries to find 'DemoSupplier' and 'AcctBigSupplier' >>> party. >>> - This change will help to load test data without producing any >>> foreign key error. >>> - --> >>> - <Party partyId="DemoSupplier"/> >>> + >>> + <Party partyId="DemoSupplier" partyTypeId="PARTY_GROUP"/> >>> + <PartyGroup partyId="DemoSupplier" groupName="Demo Supplier"/> >>> + <PartyRole partyId="DemoSupplier" roleTypeId="SUPPLIER"/> >>> + <ContactMech contactMechId="9001" contactMechTypeId="POSTAL_ADDR >>> ESS"/> >>> + <PartyContactMech partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >>> fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" allowSolicitation="Y"/> >>> + <PostalAddress contactMechId="9001" toName="Demo Supplier Company" >>> address1="2004 Factory Blvd" city="City of Industry" postalCode="90000" >>> countryGeoId="USA" stateProvinceGeoId="CA"/> >>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="BILLING_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="GENERAL_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="PAYMENT_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>> + <UserLogin userLoginId="DemoSupplier" currentPassword="{SHA}47b56994 >>> cbc2b6d10aa1be30f70165adb305a41a" partyId="DemoSupplier"/> >>> <Party partyId="AcctBigSupplier"/> >>> <!--demo data for testCancelCheckRunPayments--> >>> >>> Taher, All, >> Should this data not better in party component? >> >> Jacques >> |
I know I'm stating the obvious, but just to confirm tests are passing on
framework-alone right? On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Done at r1794092 > > Jacques > > > > Le 02/05/2017 à 13:28, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > >> Hi Jacques, >> >> Again, feel free to change the data. My objective was simply to get tests >> running successfully on framework-alone and I would actually appreciate >> your help since you already did the viewing and testing? >> >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Le 29/04/2017 à 09:07, [hidden email] a écrit : >>> >>> Author: taher >>>> Date: Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 >>>> New Revision: 1793170 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793170&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> Fixed: Remove all dependencies from OFBiz framework to plugins >>>> (OFBIZ-9322) >>>> >>>> Further removed dependencies on demo data defined in ecommerce by >>>> modifying >>>> the following data items: >>>> - Move the DemoSupplier demo data from ecommerce to accounting >>>> - Move the PartyIdentificationType of "CARD_ID" from ecommerce to party >>>> >>>> This brings down total failing tests to only two >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/De >>>> moPaymentsInvoices.xml >>>> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/party/data/PartyDe >>>> moData.xml >>>> >>>> Modified: ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/Dem >>>> oPaymentsInvoices.xml >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/app >>>> lications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml?rev=17931 >>>> 70&r1=1793169&r2=1793170&view=diff >>>> ============================================================ >>>> ================== >>>> --- ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/Dem >>>> oPaymentsInvoices.xml >>>> (original) >>>> +++ ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/Dem >>>> oPaymentsInvoices.xml >>>> Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 >>>> @@ -74,13 +74,17 @@ under the License. >>>> <Invoice invoiceId="8001" invoiceTypeId="PURCHASE_INVOICE" >>>> partyIdFrom="AcctBigSupplier" partyId="Company" statusId="INVOICE_READY" >>>> currencyUomId="USD" invoiceDate="2009-07-06 16:48:40.952" >>>> paidDate="2009-07-06 16:52:52.901" dueDate="2009-08-05 16:48:40.952"/> >>>> <InvoiceItem invoiceId="8001" invoiceItemSeqId="1" >>>> invoiceItemTypeId="PINV_SURCHARGE_ADJ" taxableFlag="Y" >>>> quantity="1.000000" amount="10.000"/> >>>> - >>>> - <!-- >>>> - plugins components are loaded after applications components. >>>> DemoSupplier & AcctBigSupplier data exists in ecommerce component. >>>> - So it creates foreign key violation as accounting component is >>>> loaded first and it tries to find 'DemoSupplier' and 'AcctBigSupplier' >>>> party. >>>> - This change will help to load test data without producing any >>>> foreign key error. >>>> - --> >>>> - <Party partyId="DemoSupplier"/> >>>> + >>>> + <Party partyId="DemoSupplier" partyTypeId="PARTY_GROUP"/> >>>> + <PartyGroup partyId="DemoSupplier" groupName="Demo Supplier"/> >>>> + <PartyRole partyId="DemoSupplier" roleTypeId="SUPPLIER"/> >>>> + <ContactMech contactMechId="9001" contactMechTypeId="POSTAL_ADDR >>>> ESS"/> >>>> + <PartyContactMech partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >>>> fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" allowSolicitation="Y"/> >>>> + <PostalAddress contactMechId="9001" toName="Demo Supplier Company" >>>> address1="2004 Factory Blvd" city="City of Industry" postalCode="90000" >>>> countryGeoId="USA" stateProvinceGeoId="CA"/> >>>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" >>>> contactMechId="9001" >>>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="BILLING_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" >>>> contactMechId="9001" >>>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="GENERAL_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" >>>> contactMechId="9001" >>>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="PAYMENT_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>>> + <UserLogin userLoginId="DemoSupplier" >>>> currentPassword="{SHA}47b56994 >>>> cbc2b6d10aa1be30f70165adb305a41a" partyId="DemoSupplier"/> >>>> <Party partyId="AcctBigSupplier"/> >>>> <!--demo data for testCancelCheckRunPayments--> >>>> >>>> Taher, All, >>>> >>> Should this data not better in party component? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> > |
Administrator
|
Yep, as mentioned in the commit
Jacques Le 06/05/2017 à 03:30, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > I know I'm stating the obvious, but just to confirm tests are passing on > framework-alone right? > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Done at r1794092 >> >> Jacques >> >> >> >> Le 02/05/2017 à 13:28, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : >> >>> Hi Jacques, >>> >>> Again, feel free to change the data. My objective was simply to get tests >>> running successfully on framework-alone and I would actually appreciate >>> your help since you already did the viewing and testing? >>> >>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Le 29/04/2017 à 09:07, [hidden email] a écrit : >>>> Author: taher >>>>> Date: Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 >>>>> New Revision: 1793170 >>>>> >>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793170&view=rev >>>>> Log: >>>>> Fixed: Remove all dependencies from OFBiz framework to plugins >>>>> (OFBIZ-9322) >>>>> >>>>> Further removed dependencies on demo data defined in ecommerce by >>>>> modifying >>>>> the following data items: >>>>> - Move the DemoSupplier demo data from ecommerce to accounting >>>>> - Move the PartyIdentificationType of "CARD_ID" from ecommerce to party >>>>> >>>>> This brings down total failing tests to only two >>>>> >>>>> Modified: >>>>> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/De >>>>> moPaymentsInvoices.xml >>>>> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/party/data/PartyDe >>>>> moData.xml >>>>> >>>>> Modified: ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/Dem >>>>> oPaymentsInvoices.xml >>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/app >>>>> lications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml?rev=17931 >>>>> 70&r1=1793169&r2=1793170&view=diff >>>>> ============================================================ >>>>> ================== >>>>> --- ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/Dem >>>>> oPaymentsInvoices.xml >>>>> (original) >>>>> +++ ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/Dem >>>>> oPaymentsInvoices.xml >>>>> Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017 >>>>> @@ -74,13 +74,17 @@ under the License. >>>>> <Invoice invoiceId="8001" invoiceTypeId="PURCHASE_INVOICE" >>>>> partyIdFrom="AcctBigSupplier" partyId="Company" statusId="INVOICE_READY" >>>>> currencyUomId="USD" invoiceDate="2009-07-06 16:48:40.952" >>>>> paidDate="2009-07-06 16:52:52.901" dueDate="2009-08-05 16:48:40.952"/> >>>>> <InvoiceItem invoiceId="8001" invoiceItemSeqId="1" >>>>> invoiceItemTypeId="PINV_SURCHARGE_ADJ" taxableFlag="Y" >>>>> quantity="1.000000" amount="10.000"/> >>>>> - >>>>> - <!-- >>>>> - plugins components are loaded after applications components. >>>>> DemoSupplier & AcctBigSupplier data exists in ecommerce component. >>>>> - So it creates foreign key violation as accounting component is >>>>> loaded first and it tries to find 'DemoSupplier' and 'AcctBigSupplier' >>>>> party. >>>>> - This change will help to load test data without producing any >>>>> foreign key error. >>>>> - --> >>>>> - <Party partyId="DemoSupplier"/> >>>>> + >>>>> + <Party partyId="DemoSupplier" partyTypeId="PARTY_GROUP"/> >>>>> + <PartyGroup partyId="DemoSupplier" groupName="Demo Supplier"/> >>>>> + <PartyRole partyId="DemoSupplier" roleTypeId="SUPPLIER"/> >>>>> + <ContactMech contactMechId="9001" contactMechTypeId="POSTAL_ADDR >>>>> ESS"/> >>>>> + <PartyContactMech partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" >>>>> fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000" allowSolicitation="Y"/> >>>>> + <PostalAddress contactMechId="9001" toName="Demo Supplier Company" >>>>> address1="2004 Factory Blvd" city="City of Industry" postalCode="90000" >>>>> countryGeoId="USA" stateProvinceGeoId="CA"/> >>>>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" >>>>> contactMechId="9001" >>>>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="BILLING_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>>>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>>>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" >>>>> contactMechId="9001" >>>>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="GENERAL_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>>>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>>>> + <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" >>>>> contactMechId="9001" >>>>> contactMechPurposeTypeId="PAYMENT_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 >>>>> 00:00:00.000"/> >>>>> + <UserLogin userLoginId="DemoSupplier" >>>>> currentPassword="{SHA}47b56994 >>>>> cbc2b6d10aa1be30f70165adb305a41a" partyId="DemoSupplier"/> >>>>> <Party partyId="AcctBigSupplier"/> >>>>> <!--demo data for testCancelCheckRunPayments--> >>>>> >>>>> Taher, All, >>>>> >>>> Should this data not better in party component? >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |