> To summarize:
>
> 1) we will move the text from NOTICE to LICENSE, because it is currently
> misplaced
> 2) you will ask legal if the "SIL OPEN FONT" LICENSE Version 1.1 can be
> considered a category-A license
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
>
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jacopo,
>>
>>
>> Le 04/04/2018 à 12:12, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:54 AM, <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: jleroux
>>>> Date: Thu Nov 16 05:54:23 2017
>>>> New Revision: 1815412
>>>>
>>>> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1815412&view=rev>>>> Log:
>>>> No functional change.
>>>>
>>>> With this fix, about the Quicksand Google font licensed under the
>>>> SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE Version 1.1, we are now clear from all licensing
>>>> issues
>>>> Though we are still waiting for INFRA-15466 to check the RAT Buildbot
>>>> result...
>>>>
>>>> BTW I referred to
https://nifi.apache.org/licensing-guide.html about how
>>>> to
>>>> handle this case. Only a change in NOTICE was needed, not in LICENSE.
>>>> Nice
>>>> TLP
>>>> document, that I'll check again later...
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/NOTICE
>>>> ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/themes/rainbowstone/README.md
>>>> ofbiz/tools/rat-excludes.txt
>>>>
>>>> Modified: ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/NOTICE
>>>> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/>>>> NOTICE?rev=1815412&r1=1815411&r2=1815412&view=diff
>>>> ============================================================
>>>> ==================
>>>> --- ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/NOTICE (original)
>>>> +++ ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/NOTICE Thu Nov 16 05:54:23 2017
>>>> @@ -3,3 +3,8 @@ Copyright 2001-2017 The Apache Software
>>>>
>>>> This product includes software developed by
>>>> The Apache Software Foundation (
http://www.apache.org/).
>>>> +===========================================================
>>>> ==============
>>>> +
>>>> +This product bundles the "Quicksand Google font", which is available
>>>> +under the "SIL OFL License 1.1" license.
>>>> +For details, see themes/rainbowstone/webapp/rai
>>>> nbowstone/fonts/quicksand
>>>>
>>>> I believe that the above should be in the LICENSE file, not in the NOTICE
>>> file, according to [1].
>>> Unless there are specific reasons for which you added it to the NOTICE
>>> file, I will move it there.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> [1]
https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html>>>
>> Looking at it again, I don't remember what decided me to refer to Nifi
>> licensing guide. I said "I'll check again later..." and I just did.
>>
>> I think you are right. It's a kind of Category-A licenses. Hence should
>> not need a NOTICE but a LICENSE change.
>>
>> Ah wait, I think what decided me to put it in NOTICE is because it's a
>> free license but not a MIT/BSD type. I read at
>>
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice:>>
>> Copyright notifications which have been relocated <
>>
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers> from source files
>> (rather than removed) must be preserved in |NOTICE|.
>> However, elements such as the copyright notifications embedded within
>> BSD and MIT licenses need <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-59>
>> not <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-62> be duplicated in
>> |NOTICE| -- it suffices to leave those notices in their original locations.
>>
>> Then I did not refer-to/read the relocated link and I understand now that
>> relocated means that the licensed product has been donated to the ASF.
>>
>> I tough think that it would be good to ask legal. Not because I doubt but
>> it will help future possible users to find this license in the Category-A
>> licenses list at
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
Locked
