Re: svn commit: r835270 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/marketing/ applications/marketing/config/ applications/marketing/data/ applications/marketing/src/org/ofbiz/sfa/vcard/ applications/marketing/webapp/sfa/WEB-INF/ applications/marketing/widget/sf

[Chatree Srichart]

for using ManagePortalPages in webapp which its main-decorator as two
columns, has left and right child screen, the css will don't work. I think
ManagePortalPages should use with CommonPartyDecorator.

[Scott Gray-2]

A css problem doesn't dictate what decorator should be chosen, why not  
just wrap the screen in a no-clear styled container?  The portal pages  
are intended to embedded in applications and it makes no sense to  
require a specific decorator.

Regards
Scot

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 24/11/2009, at 11:56 PM, Chatree Srichart wrote:

> for using ManagePortalPages in webapp which its main-decorator as two
> columns, has left and right child screen, the css will don't work. I  
> think
> ManagePortalPages should use with CommonPartyDecorator.

[Scott Gray-2]

I've changed it back in r883900 and wrapped the body section in a no-
clear container, if you or Hans see any issues let me know and I'll  
look into it.

Thanks
Scott

On 25/11/2009, at 1:08 AM, Scott Gray wrote:

> A css problem doesn't dictate what decorator should be chosen, why  
> not just wrap the screen in a no-clear styled container?  The portal  
> pages are intended to embedded in applications and it makes no sense  
> to require a specific decorator.
>
> Regards
> Scot
>
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> On 24/11/2009, at 11:56 PM, Chatree Srichart wrote:
>
>> for using ManagePortalPages in webapp which its main-decorator as two
>> columns, has left and right child screen, the css will don't work.  
>> I think
>> ManagePortalPages should use with CommonPartyDecorator.
>

[Chatree Srichart]

Thank you very much, Scott

I saw it. It work fine.

[Scott Gray-2]

That's great, thanks Chatree.

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 25/11/2009, at 3:18 PM, Chatree Srichart wrote:

> Thank you very much, Scott
>
> I saw it. It work fine.