Re: svn commit: r931787 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml

[Adrian Crum-2]

An OFbiz feature - you can override service definitions.

-Adrian

--- On Wed, 4/7/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
> Subject: svn commit: r931787 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 10:52 PM
> Author: lektran
> Date: Thu Apr  8 05:52:37 2010
> New Revision: 931787
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931787&view=rev
> Log:
> Service definition was pointing to the wrong implementation
> location, strange that they're in different components
>
> Modified:
>    
> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>
> Modified:
> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml?rev=931787&r1=931786&r2=931787&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> ---
> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
> (original)
> +++
> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
> Thu Apr  8 05:52:37 2010
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ under the License.
>  
>      <!-- permission check -->
>      <service
> name="securityPermissionCheck" engine="simple"
> -         
>    location="component://securityext/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml"
> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck">
> +         
>    location="component://common/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml"
> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck">
>          <implements
> service="permissionInterface"/>
>          <attribute
> name="primaryPermission" type="String" mode="IN"
> optional="true" default-value="SECURITY"/>
>      </service>
>
>
>

[Scott Gray-2]

Thanks for sharing, but what is the relevance?

Regards
Scott

On 8/04/2010, at 1:21 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> An OFbiz feature - you can override service definitions.
>
> -Adrian
>
> --- On Wed, 4/7/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: svn commit: r931787 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 10:52 PM
>> Author: lektran
>> Date: Thu Apr  8 05:52:37 2010
>> New Revision: 931787
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931787&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Service definition was pointing to the wrong implementation
>> location, strange that they're in different components
>>
>> Modified:
>>    
>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>
>> Modified:
>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml?rev=931787&r1=931786&r2=931787&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> ---
>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>> (original)
>> +++
>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>> Thu Apr  8 05:52:37 2010
>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ under the License.
>>
>>      <!-- permission check -->
>>      <service
>> name="securityPermissionCheck" engine="simple"
>> -        
>>    location="component://securityext/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml"
>> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck">
>> +        
>>    location="component://common/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml"
>> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck">
>>          <implements
>> service="permissionInterface"/>
>>          <attribute
>> name="primaryPermission" type="String" mode="IN"
>> optional="true" default-value="SECURITY"/>
>>      </service>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

[Adrian Crum]

I have no idea. I'm sure it made sense at 1:21 AM though.

-Adrian

Scott Gray wrote:

> Thanks for sharing, but what is the relevance?
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 8/04/2010, at 1:21 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
>> An OFbiz feature - you can override service definitions.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> --- On Wed, 4/7/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
>>> Subject: svn commit: r931787 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>> To: [hidden email]
>>> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 10:52 PM
>>> Author: lektran
>>> Date: Thu Apr  8 05:52:37 2010
>>> New Revision: 931787
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931787&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Service definition was pointing to the wrong implementation
>>> location, strange that they're in different components
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>    
>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml?rev=931787&r1=931786&r2=931787&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> ---
>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>> (original)
>>> +++
>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>> Thu Apr  8 05:52:37 2010
>>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ under the License.
>>>
>>>      <!-- permission check -->
>>>      <service
>>> name="securityPermissionCheck" engine="simple"
>>> -        
>>>    location="component://securityext/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml"
>>> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck">
>>> +        
>>>    location="component://common/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml"
>>> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck">
>>>          <implements
>>> service="permissionInterface"/>
>>>          <attribute
>>> name="primaryPermission" type="String" mode="IN"
>>> optional="true" default-value="SECURITY"/>
>>>      </service>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

[Scott Gray-2]

Okay thanks, I'll stay up until then tonight and reread it :-)

Regards
Scott

On 8/04/2010, at 9:27 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> I have no idea. I'm sure it made sense at 1:21 AM though.
>
> -Adrian
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> Thanks for sharing, but what is the relevance?
>> Regards
>> Scott
>> On 8/04/2010, at 1:21 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>> An OFbiz feature - you can override service definitions.
>>>
>>> -Adrian
>>>
>>> --- On Wed, 4/7/10, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
>>>> Subject: svn commit: r931787 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>>> To: [hidden email]
>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 10:52 PM
>>>> Author: lektran
>>>> Date: Thu Apr  8 05:52:37 2010
>>>> New Revision: 931787
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931787&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Service definition was pointing to the wrong implementation
>>>> location, strange that they're in different components
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>   ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml?rev=931787&r1=931786&r2=931787&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> ---
>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>>> (original)
>>>> +++
>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml
>>>> Thu Apr  8 05:52:37 2010
>>>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>
>>>>     <!-- permission check -->
>>>>     <service
>>>> name="securityPermissionCheck" engine="simple"
>>>> -            location="component://securityext/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml"
>>>> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck">
>>>> +            location="component://common/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml"
>>>> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck">
>>>>         <implements
>>>> service="permissionInterface"/>
>>>>         <attribute
>>>> name="primaryPermission" type="String" mode="IN"
>>>> optional="true" default-value="SECURITY"/>
>>>>     </service>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>