From: "Adam Heath" <
[hidden email]>
: <
[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r948846 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/entitydef/
applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/ applications/accounting/webapp/ap/WEB-INF/
applications/accounting/webapp/ar/WEB-INF/ applications/commonext/documents/ applica...
>
[hidden email] wrote:
>> Author: jleroux
>> Date: Thu May 27 14:23:22 2010
>> New Revision: 948846
>>
>> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=948846&view=rev>> Log:
>> We don't need
>>
>> <copyright>Copyright 2001-.* The Apache Software Foundation</copyright>
>> <copyright><year>.*</year><holder>Apache Foundation</holder></copyright>
>> <copyright><year>.*</year><holder>Apache Foundation.</holder></copyright>
>> <owner>Copyright 2001-.* The Apache Software Foundation</owner>
>>
>> Less to update every year!
>>
>> Thanks to BJ 1st effort at "update files from 2009 to 2010" (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3783) - OFBIZ-3783
>>
>> Note: there are been a lot of efforts in 2009: there are plenty of data dated from this year!
>>
>> I hope I did not broke anything (should not, but of course I did not try all changes...) Anyway, this can be easily reverted...
>>
>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
>> URL:
>>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=948846&r1=948845&r2=948846&view=diff>> ==============================================================================
>> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original)
>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Thu May 27 14:23:22 2010
>> @@ -25,8 +25,7 @@ under the License.
>> <!-- ========================================================= -->
>> <title>Entity of an Open For Business Project Component</title>
>> <description>None</description>
>> - <copyright>Copyright 2001-2009 The Apache Software Foundation</copyright>
>> - <author>None</author>
>> + <author>None</author>
>> <version>1.0</version>
>>
>
> There are lots of cases of bad formatting introduced with this change.
Yes, I saw that too and fixed them at r948852
Jacques