At revision: 1526686
I put a better comment in templates/web.xml and removes useless and confusing websiteId in web.xml files
I did not remove some others, but I believe they don't make sense as they are.
Take for instance those data
<WebSite webSiteId="EBAY_STORE1" siteName="eBay Store1" standardContentPrefix="
http://demo.ofbiz.org" productStoreId="90101"/>
<WebSite webSiteId="EBAY_STORE2" siteName="eBay Store2" standardContentPrefix="
http://demo.ofbiz.org" productStoreId="90102"/>
<WebSite webSiteId="GOOGLEBASE" standardContentPrefix="
http://demo.ofbiz.org" productStoreId="9000" />
Sorry but
http://demo.ofbiz.org/ leads nowhere!
And do we need to keep those referring to productStoreId="9000" in web.xml files? They have not their own webapps
<WebSite webSiteId="CmsSite" siteName="CMS Web Site"/>
<WebSite webSiteId="OfbizSite" siteName="OFBiz Web Site"/>
<WebSite webSiteId="GOOGLECHECKOUT" productStoreId="9000" />
<WebSite webSiteId="GOOGLECHECKOUT" productStoreId="9000" />
I think we should keep in web.xml files, only ecommerce/clone and webPos (uses POS store)
Jacques
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> This makes sense
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1153352&view=rev> You said
> <<Because these back-end applications do not have a website and probably never will remove the website records and definitions in
> web.xml as an experiment for the accounting, order, product and party component. if there are no problems others will follow.... >>
>
> I think we should continue in applications (not content?) and do the same for all specialpurpose applications but ecommerce and
> maybe cmssite
>
> Then I will update this page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6553757> and we should comment in ScreenRenderer.populateContextForRequest() to clarify which webapps are concerned
>
>
> Jacques
Locked
