Rename specialpurpose components in Jira

[Jacques Le Roux]

HI,

While doing some Jiras I thought that, after last Taher's work on plugins, one day we will need to rename  the specialpurpose components in Jira.

For that I guess we should better wait that all released versions use this mechanism, right?

Jacques

[Sharan Foga]

Hi Jacques

Aren't we going to need them both active at the same time ? (so am not sure if a simple rename will work.)

Thanks
Sharan

On 2017-01-30 21:49 (+0100), Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:
> HI,
>
> While doing some Jiras I thought that, after last Taher's work on plugins, one day we will need to rename  the specialpurpose components in Jira.
>
> For that I guess we should better wait that all released versions use this mechanism, right?
>
> Jacques
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi Sharan,

Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good idea for UX.

I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and specialpurpose), et voilà :)

Agreed all?

Jacques


Le 31/01/2017 à 11:13, Sharan Foga a écrit :

> Hi Jacques
>
> Aren't we going to need them both active at the same time ? (so am not sure if a simple rename will work.)
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> On 2017-01-30 21:49 (+0100), Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> HI,
>>
>> While doing some Jiras I thought that, after last Taher's work on plugins, one day we will need to rename  the specialpurpose components in Jira.
>>
>> For that I guess we should better wait that all released versions use this mechanism, right?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>

[Jacopo Cappellato-5]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Sharan,
>
> Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good idea
> for UX.
>
> I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and
> specialpurpose), et voilà :)
>
> Agreed all?


+1

[Sharan-F]

So do you mean instead of 'specialpurpose/birt' just 'birt' ?


On 31/01/17 11:54, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi Sharan,
>
> Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good
> idea for UX.
>
> I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and
> specialpurpose), et voilà :)
>
> Agreed all?
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 31/01/2017 à 11:13, Sharan Foga a écrit :
>> Hi Jacques
>>
>> Aren't we going to need them both active at the same time ? (so am
>> not sure if a simple rename will work.)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sharan
>>
>> On 2017-01-30 21:49 (+0100), Jacques Le Roux
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> While doing some Jiras I thought that, after last Taher's work on
>>> plugins, one day we will need to rename  the specialpurpose
>>> components in Jira.
>>>
>>> For that I guess we should better wait that all released versions
>>> use this mechanism, right?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Yep

Jacques


Le 31/01/2017 à 12:39, Sharan Foga a écrit :

>
> So do you mean instead of 'specialpurpose/birt' just 'birt' ?
>
>
> On 31/01/17 11:54, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Hi Sharan,
>>
>> Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good idea for UX.
>>
>> I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and specialpurpose), et voilà :)
>>
>> Agreed all?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 31/01/2017 à 11:13, Sharan Foga a écrit :
>>> Hi Jacques
>>>
>>> Aren't we going to need them both active at the same time ? (so am not sure if a simple rename will work.)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sharan
>>>
>>> On 2017-01-30 21:49 (+0100), Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> HI,
>>>>
>>>> While doing some Jiras I thought that, after last Taher's work on plugins, one day we will need to rename  the specialpurpose components in Jira.
>>>>
>>>> For that I guess we should better wait that all released versions use this mechanism, right?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>

[Sharan-F]

OK cool - nice and simple. That's  +1 from me!

Thanks
Sharan

On 31/01/17 13:30, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Yep
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 31/01/2017 à 12:39, Sharan Foga a écrit :
>>
>> So do you mean instead of 'specialpurpose/birt' just 'birt' ?
>>
>>
>> On 31/01/17 11:54, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Hi Sharan,
>>>
>>> Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good
>>> idea for UX.
>>>
>>> I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and
>>> specialpurpose), et voilà :)
>>>
>>> Agreed all?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 31/01/2017 à 11:13, Sharan Foga a écrit :
>>>> Hi Jacques
>>>>
>>>> Aren't we going to need them both active at the same time ? (so am
>>>> not sure if a simple rename will work.)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Sharan
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-01-30 21:49 (+0100), Jacques Le Roux
>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> HI,
>>>>>
>>>>> While doing some Jiras I thought that, after last Taher's work on
>>>>> plugins, one day we will need to rename  the specialpurpose
>>>>> components in Jira.
>>>>>
>>>>> For that I guess we should better wait that all released versions
>>>>> use this mechanism, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Done,

I removed appserver and pos only in R14.12 now

Kept specialpurpose/googlebase and specialpurpose/googleCheckout but I think they should be removed also, same for specialpurpose/oagis

Jacques


Le 31/01/2017 à 11:54, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> Hi Sharan,
>
> Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good idea for UX.
>
> I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and specialpurpose), et voilà :)
>
> Agreed all?
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 31/01/2017 à 11:13, Sharan Foga a écrit :
>> Hi Jacques
>>
>> Aren't we going to need them both active at the same time ? (so am not sure if a simple rename will work.)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sharan
>>
>> On 2017-01-30 21:49 (+0100), Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> While doing some Jiras I thought that, after last Taher's work on plugins, one day we will need to rename  the specialpurpose components in Jira.
>>>
>>> For that I guess we should better wait that all released versions use this mechanism, right?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>
>